At long last, Turkey's consitutional court has reversed the conviction of the more than 200 officers previously found guilty in the bogus Sledgehammer coup plot, leading to the release on June 19th of all those in jail (including my father in law).
Even though a retrial is to take place, the ruling is a coda to the last four-and-a-half years during which my wife and I moonlighted as criminal investigator, forensic analyst, and political activist. It has been a truly surreal and bizarre experience, given how so many intelligent people bought into -- and refused let go of -- a coup plot that was patently fictitious.
So I thought this would be a good time to post a longish account of my involvement in the story. I wrote it as much to make sense of it to myself as to explain it to others. You can download it here.
I somewhat frowned at the sentence "a vibrant, apparently free society that descended into a republic of dirty tricks and lost itself". Authoritarian dirty tricks is not completely foreign to Turkey, is it?
A few years ago I put together "popular history" for some of the most important contries in the world, see (in Swedish) http://www.folkrorelser.org/land/landindex.html. Usually it was easy to find sources. But there were two major countries for whitch it seemed impossible: Thailand and Turkey. All there was, was authoritarian topdown history, with The State as the sole actor.
All other countries, Egypt, France, Kongo, Japan, Brazil, etc etc, had histories of social movements stretching hundreds of years back - but not Turkey and Thailand. At least nothing noted in the official history books.
And this is a disturbing sign of a deeply ingrained authoritarian political culture, I think.
Posted by: Wiklundsjanne.wordpress.com | September 16, 2014 at 08:15 AM
PS. I checked this with Turkish social movement scholar Kumru Toktamis, who agreed: it's a disturbing sign that something is wrong and has been for a long time.
Also the wellknown prohibition of using certain languages, which was lifted very recently. Also illiberal laws concerning "denigration of turkishness" and other mumbo-jumbo.
I don't deny by any means that democracy is under constant threat everywhere by people who don't wish competition in politics and decision-making. But traditions may be more or less authoritarian. And I suspect that authoritarian traditions in Turkey are fairly strong.
Posted by: Wiklundsjanne.wordpress.com | September 17, 2014 at 06:14 AM
I don't deny by any signifies that democracy is below continuous threat everywhere by those who never want competition in politics and decision-making. But traditions might be additional or less authoritarian. And I suspect that authoritarian traditions in Turkey are pretty powerful.
agree this words
by Adaptador Ordenador Portátil
Posted by: penny | September 25, 2014 at 02:41 AM
jsem přesvědčen, že láska zachrání nás svět! http://ceskarna.com/ přeji mnoho štěstí a zdraví
Posted by: Jan Hecz | March 05, 2015 at 08:37 AM
Thanks for an interesting compendium. To some extent, I have always had a liking for Acemoglu's argument that the election of the AKP government distributed power in new ways, opening up opportunities for masses of people. That is democratisation.
At the same time, I always found it pitiful that when the AKP took on the army - aomething it would have to do at one point or the other - it did so by a sham case rather than accusing army officers of crimes they certainly did committ. Against kurds and other minorities, and against political opponents in times of coups and others. The reasons for that are obvious, fo course, but still pitiful.
Now, the tide certainly turned at some point. Erdogan and Gulen fell out. Perhaps more importantly, Erdogan fell out with many of his western supporters as well as the Turkish intelligentsia. The process that started externally on the Mavi Marmara, culminated with riots in Istanbul and other cities.
But the fact that Erdogan, or Gulen for that matter, are of no more democratic nature than the army, does not necessarily spell disaster for democracy in Turkey. With three competing powerhouses, the AKP, the army, and the Gulenist, and a street that has again woken up, the scenario that Turkish politics will again be dominated by one force does not look nearly as realistic as it once did.
It seems like Erdogan can not outmaneuvre the Gulenists without the tacit support of the army, and it appearsm for an outsider, that any government must be careful not to provoke the street and the liberals too much, lest they may be toppled by popular protest.
The breaking of the army's power has certainly been a gamechanger, and 350+ officers and their families paid a price for that, but it might just as well have lead to an improvement in Turkey's road to democracy.
Posted by: Tord Steiro | June 02, 2015 at 04:49 PM
I believe it’s horrible to read such stuff, I always prefer to ignore these. I believe that we should always be positive and that is not just going to help us in life, but in work we do and for me it is already helping me with help of mighty broker OctaFX, it’s a pretty solid company with having high class benefits especially with rebate service where I can earn 15 dollars profits per lot size trade while it’s given even on the losing trades.
Posted by: Mind Time | August 24, 2015 at 09:54 PM
Great stuff. I always keep doing research on education & career field. While searching online, I found your blog is very useful for the people those looking for a bright career. In short, I can say that it can help people on taking right decision at right time when it comes to education.
Thanks & Regards,
http://www.globalexecutiveacademy.edu.my
Posted by: Ale Rossi | October 25, 2015 at 12:44 AM
ciri jantung koroner
Posted by: eri alaspari | October 28, 2015 at 09:55 PM