Ugh, yet again! But the question of whether trade liberalization/protection promotes or retards economic growth is one of those venerable topic of discussion in economics that simply refuses to go away. See for example Ha-Joon Chang's recent op-ed in the FT. One reason is that much of the discussion is driven by pre-conceived ideas (on the efficacy of markets versus governments) instead of actual evidence.
Two recent papers represent a significant advance. One, by Lehmann and O'Rourke focuses on the late 19th century, while the other, by Estevadeordal and Taylor, looks at the last thirty years. The chief contribution of these two papers is that they actually differentiate between different types of tariffs. Lehmann and O'Rourke distinguish between tariffs that protected industry, tariffs that protected agriculture, and tariffs intended to simply raise revenue. Their conclusion:
Industrial tariffs were positively correlated with growth. Agricultural tariffs were negatively correlated with growth, although the relationship was often statistically insignificant at conventional levels. There was no relationship between revenue tariffs and growth.
The sample of countries is a group of mostly developed countries over the period of 1875-1913.
Estevadeordal and Taylor, meanwhile, distinguish among tariffs on capital, intermediate, and consumer goods (plus they use an imaginative identification strategy to alleviate reverse-causation concerns). They find that it is mainly tariffs on capital and intermediate goods that retard growth, while tariffs on consumer goods have a much weaker effect.
Now, the two sets of results are somewhat in tension with each other, and it is not clear whether the differences are due to differences in statistical methods, or to the fact that the late 19th and late 20th centuries were inherently different, with the former being a period in which protection of industrial goods was good for growth while the latter was one where, at best, it was not too damaging.
Regardless of reconciliation, the bottom line is this: what matters is the structure of protection (what is being protected). The answer to the age-old question is one that economists should be accustomed to giving: it depends.
And of course one thing that it depends on is the overall state of the global macro-economy. At a time when the world is digging deeper into recession, exporting your problems through trade protection is the last thing that any responsible country should be doing.
Of course, Chinese export subsidies and currency manipulation are a form of trade protection.
Posted by: lark | November 17, 2008 at 06:03 PM
"...one thing that it depends on is the overall state of the global macro-economy."
Why's that? If certain kinds of protectionism work then why should they only be used when the world economy is OK?
Posted by: James | November 17, 2008 at 07:59 PM
The reason all Protectionism is wrong is that you can't raise tariffs on one group of products without risking that your trade partners will raise trade barriers on a different product that you sell. Then you have a vicious downward cycle. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don't ruin the half century of progress by promoting protectionism, or else dark day are indeed upon us.
Posted by: the dude | November 18, 2008 at 01:52 AM
by "imaginative" identification strategy, did u mean "no" identification strategy? Diff-n'-Diff won't solve an endogeneity problem...
Posted by: kirsten duntz | November 18, 2008 at 02:47 AM
The important issue is the policy alternative. Is placing tariffs on consumer goods better than taxing imported and domestically produced consumer good equally? Are tarifis on specific goods better than producting subsidies to those goods? The argument against protection is generally taht for any given policy objective you can usually find a better instrument.
Posted by: Thomas | November 18, 2008 at 07:39 AM
In the "short run" American blue collar workers are getting the stuffing beat out of them.
Standard of living - gone. Pensions - gone. Job security - gone. Need I go on?
So will it really be better in the "long run?"
Posted by: save_the_rustbelt | November 18, 2008 at 09:30 AM
In the "short run" American blue collar workers are getting the stuffing beat out of them.
Standard of living - gone. Pensions - gone. Job security - gone. Need I go on?
So will it really be better in the "long run?"
Posted by: save_the_rustbelt | November 18, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Perhaps some of the differences in results can be attributed to the effect of financial liberalization in combination with tariff-slashing?
Imagine this:
A previously poorly governed country, like, say former Communist country, experiences a political revolution. The government is democratized, and the economy is turned into a capitalist one, with economic (perhaps especially import) liberalization as well as financial liberalization.
Common sense, as well as most economic theory, suggest that there should be plenty of profitable investment opportunities in the country's inefficient firms. New capital and management skills will increase profitability en masse, and democratization of weak, authoritarian institutions should give the country a second boost.
However, that will not happen. As capital flow into the country, through loans and FDI, the currency appreciates. And as the currency appreciates at the same time as tariffs are removed, domestic industry is hit by a double whammy, and lose competitiveness far faster than institutions can be reformed and investments can pay off.
Hence, the incentive for the country's citizens is not one investing in export or import-competing production, but one of investing in shielded production - services - that is not hit by the problem of currency appreciation and tariff slashing.
And, since no exports means there is no foreign currency to pay for imports... Wait! Since loans and FDI still flows into the country for a while after most investors stopped investing in production, there is a boom in import consumption financed with money borrowed abroad. And since the governing institutions are weak, it takes a considerable amount of time before foreign lenders turn on the red lights.
This in not far from what is happening in the US either - a consumption boom financed by borrowed money rather than exports - and I see it as very difficult how a country can embark on a situation of robust growth under such conditions.
Hence, the effect of import protection and financial liberalization should perhaps be evaluated together?
I have not read the linked papers yet, but my guess would be that capital inflows plays a role in how import tariffs (and export subsidies) perform in regard to growth.
Just a thought. Comments highly appreciated!
Posted by: Tord Steiro | November 18, 2008 at 10:06 AM
What about export restriction? If one country does not allow its companies to export, is that a trade barrier?
Posted by: fatbrick | November 18, 2008 at 02:00 PM
Correlation does not equal causation
Posted by: assman | November 18, 2008 at 03:02 PM
Some ideas:
1) It is possible that some kinds of protection are beneficial for a country meanwhile there are others that damage economic growth. There could be situations in wich the infant industry argumen works. But why to think that the state will be better to detect those sectors than a private firm? If to create an industry creates value why the private sector doesnt take the oportunity?
2)Trade protection effects over growth could be sthocastic with the actual knowledge we have, it could have a negative expected value, but even so it could be possible to find successful cases.
2)There could be a biased sample in the study you refer because those countries are mostly developed, so the ones that failed with their protection strategies are not taken in count.
3) It could be even possible that some easy to identify kind of trade protection are good for the economic growth of one country but even so it reduces the growth of world GDP. So free trade the best for the world as a whole.
If i made any mistake is because english is not my first language.
Posted by: camilo ferreira | November 18, 2008 at 08:47 PM
Please let's not blame this all on the Chinese. A massive financial injection into a failing (auto) industry is a relatively straightforward method of protectionism. Dani is right, this is no time for beggar-thy-neighbour policies - particularly coming on the heels of last weekend's G20.
Posted by: Dave Hart | November 18, 2008 at 10:50 PM
"Mr Obama should use protectionism in a similarly forward-looking way. Industries that can be revived through re-tooling of its factories and re-training of its workers should be given protection, but only if they fulfill certain conditions regarding investment and training. Industries that have no future should be given strictly temporary protection to ease phasing-out through orderly liquidation and redundancy."--Ha-Joon Chang
Automakers do have a future, a future where their products fit into a greener world. The greener world that policy makers will help to make. Those who have the ear of policy makers should control the boards of our automakers.
With policy makers controlling the boards of American automakers taxpayer dollars would be a vote to where society wants to go. Where automakers want to go would be the past.
Social interest should be placed before automakers interests. That today's imperative.
Automakers' future is in building cars the world needs and not ones that lobbyist advocate for. To build these cars quickly, we will need a bailout; to see that they are used, we will need protectionism.
We'll have these cars all the faster if American automakers are directed toward a single minded policy. No more "it can't be done," or "we can't do it until our customers want it." It will get done and it will get done all the sooner because there will be fewer tensions between what ought to be done and what can be done.
Think of a global NASA program for green technology. This time not to go to the moon by the end of the decade but to save the earth from climate change.
The world needs a green car. Especially China and India as more people in those societies buy automobiles. The world will need ways punish them if they undo the gains from green technology.
We all need to clime abord the green technology bandwagon. We are in a race against time. And when the world economy gets going again a green car can no longer be an option but the only option.
One way to ensure that our efforts to make the world greener isn't offset by countries which see a competitive advantage in using cheaper oil to maintain a competitive advantage rather than using green technology is the judicious and ready imposition of tariffs.
In a world without tariffs a greener world can't work, particularly if green technology ends up decreasing the price of oil.
We could just let Congress mandate standards that fit with our social needs and give all automakers who want to sell into our market a time limit in which to meet those standards. That's the slow way, the way with the most resistance. And letting American automakers fail certainly wouldn't end up giving us the redundancy we would need for competition.
Rescue our American automakers, give them directors with a mandate and we will answer our social needs and the world's that much faster. That's worth a bailout
Driving the very people who have the expertize to keep our green project on tract out of business through the use of bankruptcy proceedings makes no sense if speed is needed for a greener world.
Even the economists' arguments that allowing the automakers to go into bankurptcy in the middle of a recession, in the middle of a credit crunch, would make things worse, while true, miss the point: this is an argument we don't have time for.
It's the old thinking of the 20th Century. It's the single mindedness of the NASA thinking of that century and not the orderly liquidation through bankruptcy thinking that we want to bring to the 21st Century. That's where our future is; that's where the worlds future is.
Posted by: wjd123 | November 19, 2008 at 07:16 AM
us does not need protectionism . what we all need is free floating currencies.
Posted by: satish | November 19, 2008 at 12:28 PM
"PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don't ruin the half century of progress by promoting protectionism, or else dark day are indeed upon us."
In other words: PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don't destroy the wonderful assumptions of neo-classical economics with such trivial things as empirical evidence or else dark days are indeed upon us!
If quoting Marx is not too out of place, tariffs are introduced with "the objective of manufacturing capitalists artificially" for the "system of protection was an artificial means of manufacturing manufacturers, or expropriating independent workers, of capitalising the national means of production and subsistence, and of forcibly cutting short the transition . . . to the modern mode of production." [Capital, vol. 1, p. 932 and pp. 921-2]
So protectionism in the 19th century can be seen as a part of primitive accumulation, as the state aiding the creation of capitalism. In the 20th century, when capitalism has been created, then its impact may be different.
Perhaps that could explain part of the differences?
Posted by: Anarcho | November 20, 2008 at 05:17 AM
I wonder if agriculture tariffs for a developing country would cause food shortage problems, especially in the 19th century. Most poor nations would want to make food purchases as cheap as possible, not only to enlarge the industrial sector but also to have enough grain to keep city-dwelling factory workers well fed.
Posted by: Steve | November 28, 2008 at 06:35 PM
"Industrial tariffs were positively correlated with growth."
Note they find correlation, not necessary causation. Given the other evidence, theoretical and empirical, I think industrial tariffs usually hurt growth more than they help it. We see the correlation probably because countries that impose industrial tariffs are often making earnest efforts to grow and are likely doing other things at the same time which promote growth like investment in infrastructure and education.
Posted by: Richard H. Serlin | November 30, 2008 at 10:28 PM
Trade protection is really a complicated issue. It seems like there are pros and cons for either having it or not.
Posted by: pool cues | November 10, 2009 at 09:59 AM
This article is good. Thank for posting this good article about . You got the point here. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Male Enhancement Pills | January 02, 2010 at 05:18 PM
Great information about trade protection. Thanks for posting this trade protection article.
Posted by: Meet singles online | January 02, 2010 at 05:19 PM
This is an excellent article about trade protection and growth. I have learned a good lesson.
Posted by: SizeGenetics Reviews | February 01, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Are you getting ready to make a choice about Spring Festival Gift? I think the MBT shoes are absolutely your best choice for this colder winter!
Posted by: mbt shoes | February 25, 2010 at 09:57 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 01:18 AM
They should take up building BVLGARI Watches dams for power generation. We should FRANCK MULLER watches learn from china. They have the world's largest dam for power CHANEL Watches production, it alone produces 22,000 MW of LONGINES Watch power. So, unless the government opens up the economy more for iwc watches foreign investors, this power cut problem is a life long disease every hublot-watches india will need to face.
http://www.watchvisa.com/bvlgari-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/chanel-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/franck_muller-watches.html
Posted by: bvlgari watches | February 26, 2010 at 01:42 AM
Note they find correlation, not necessary causation. Given the other evidence, theoretical and empirical, I think industrial tariffs usually hurt growth more than they help it. We see the correlation probably because countries that impose industrial tariffs are often making earnest efforts to grow and are likely doing other things at the same time which promote growth like investment in infrastructure and education.
terry
http://www.purewaterhq.com/whole-house-filters.html
Posted by: whole house water filtration system | March 11, 2010 at 01:32 PM
The good news, thank you!
Not everyone can provide the appropriate flow of information, thanks.
Posted by: dunk shoes | March 25, 2010 at 10:29 PM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 02:04 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 03:30 AM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 05, 2010 at 10:59 PM
The good news, thank you!
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 16, 2010 at 06:57 AM
Agreed! Industrial tarrif usually hurt growth more than it helps it. Just look at Japan of today.
Posted by: Emmanuel Love | July 30, 2010 at 07:53 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. Came across your blog when I was searching bing I have found the bit of info that
I found to be quite useful.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 09:04 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. Came across your blog when I was searching bing I have found the bit of info that
I found to be quite useful.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 09:07 PM
Do you desire a house but you lack enough cash to acquire it?
Posted by: Inviseble_Demon | August 22, 2010 at 02:22 AM
Do you desire a house but you lack enough cash to acquire it?
Posted by: Alexpromos | August 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Do you have ideas which worth millions but you lack the necessary capital to put your idea to test?
Posted by: Alexpromos | August 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM
I think you have a thorough understanding in this matter. You describe in detail all here.
Posted by: Alexpromos | August 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Do you have ideas which worth millions but you lack the necessary capital to put your idea to test?
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM
I think this is a great post. One thing that I find the most helpful is number five. Sometimes when I write, I just let the flow of the words and information come out so much that I loose the purpose. It’s only after editing when I realize what I’ve done. There’s defiantly a lot of great tips here I’m going to try to be more aware of.
Posted by: jordans for sale | August 23, 2010 at 04:07 AM
I’ve seen progression in every post. Your newer posts are simply wonderful compared to your posts in the past. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 02:49 AM
If I speak in the Cheap Authentic NFL Jerseys tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all Official NFL Jerseys knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my USA Jerseys Shop body to the flames,but have not love, I gain nothing.Love is patient, NFL Jerseys love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it NHL Jerseys keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always MLB Jerseys hopes, always perseveres.Love never NHL Hockey Jerseys fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in MLB Baseball Jerseys part, but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappea. When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became NBA Basketball Jerseys man, I put childish ways behind me. Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.And now these three remain: faith, hope and NFL Football Jerseys love. But the greatest of these is love. http://www.jersey-usa.com/sitemap.html LIJ
Posted by: NFL Football Jerseys | August 29, 2010 at 03:33 AM
If I speak in the Cheap Authentic NFL Jerseys tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all Official NFL Jerseys knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my USA Jerseys Shop body to the flames,but have not love, I gain nothing.Love is patient, NFL Jerseys love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it NHL Jerseys keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always MLB Jerseys hopes, always perseveres.Love never NHL Hockey Jerseys fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in MLB Baseball Jerseys part, but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappea. When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became NBA Basketball Jerseys man, I put childish ways behind me. Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.And now these three remain: faith, hope and NFL Football Jerseys love. But the greatest of these is love. http://www.jersey-usa.com/sitemap.html LIJ
Posted by: NFL Football Jerseys | August 29, 2010 at 03:34 AM
Do you desire a house but you lack enough cash to acquire it?
Posted by: Buy_Viagra | September 15, 2010 at 09:54 AM
Do you desire a house but you lack enough cash to acquire it?
Posted by: Buy_Viagra | September 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM
tks for your post,i will bookmark it,it's so great!i will share my feelings with you,tks
Posted by: Microsoft Office 2010 | September 15, 2010 at 07:53 PM
The first stage Wedding Dresses of spring wedding will give you so many things to plan and organize. Taking some time first to think and jot down some initial wedding ideas or Evening Gowns themes is really important before referring to any wedding vendors or Evening Dresses
venues. In this way, you will be able to easily conceptualize the perfect touches Quinceanera Dresses for your spring wedding day.As we all know, spring is the mark of time of birth and renewal. Having your wedding in this beautiful season can bestow a marriage life full of excitement and adventure.
Posted by: weddingdresses | September 15, 2010 at 09:51 PM
SO the general conclusions is that tarifs do not stop growth - did not effect it in the past any way. Thank you for publishing this. It's great information we were all looking for for a while now.
Posted by: Forex trading online | September 16, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Good, smart post. I’ve done this as well and I have to see it’s great in terms of creating brand and ultimately, awareness. I speak about coach handbags, which is the investors equivalent of lifestreaming — using social media tools to add to and plug into the collective pumashoescom. I recently launched a book under the same brand. My website,http://www.coachhandbagscom.com/, will also ultimately serve as the homebase for other content products using the same content category.
Posted by: coach outlet store | September 21, 2010 at 02:27 AM
Congratulations! You have so much useful information, write more.
Posted by: Music_master | September 24, 2010 at 04:03 AM
Have you been turned down by other lenders?
Posted by: Hot_viagra | October 26, 2010 at 12:11 PM
I think you are not quite right and you should still studying the matter.
Posted by: Vidos_viagros | October 26, 2010 at 12:22 PM
Hi I liked your note, add your site to your bookmarks.
Posted by: Vidos_viagros | October 26, 2010 at 12:23 PM
I think you are not quite right and you should still studying the matter.
Posted by: Vidos_viagros | October 26, 2010 at 12:23 PM
Hi I liked your note, add your site to your bookmarks.
Posted by: Hot_viagra | October 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Have you been turned down by other lenders?
Posted by: Vidos_viagros | October 26, 2010 at 01:09 PM
Do you have a viable business but lack the necessary finances to get it off it’s feet?
Posted by: Vidos_viagros | October 26, 2010 at 01:09 PM
Have you been turned down by other lenders?
Posted by: Vidos_viagros | October 26, 2010 at 01:10 PM
cialis soft generic cialis soft order cialis soft tab description cialis soft tab india cialis soft tablets cialis soft tabs 10 mg cialis soft tabs bestseller cialis soft tabs online cialis soft top cialis softabs cialis softabs generic cialis softtab how works cialis softtabs online
Posted by: Hot_cialis | October 29, 2010 at 01:46 PM
cialis tadalafil cialis tadalafil 100mg cialis tadalafil 20 mg cialis tadalafil american express cialis tadalafil canada cialis tadalafil cialis tadafil tal cialis tadalafil reviews cialis tadalafil viagra cialis tadalafil work cialis the dangers fda cialis the sex pill cialis to buy
Posted by: Hot_cialis | October 29, 2010 at 02:08 PM
buy cialis buy cialis at a discount buy cialis brand buy cialis by the pill buy cialis canada buy cialis cheap buy cialis cheaper online buy cialis mexico buy cialis omline buy cialis online 20mg buy cialis online site buy cialis online viagra buy cialis pharmacy buy cialis pills generic
Posted by: RX-order | November 19, 2010 at 01:23 PM
I liked your site, you are very interesting to write. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Posted by: Antivirus_man | December 05, 2010 at 03:17 AM
Hi, I congratulate you on Merry Christmas!
Posted by: Antivirus_man | December 05, 2010 at 03:51 AM
i think this post is very nice have a look at this...
Research Paper Writing
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 29, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Thanks for sharing the ways on how to do it. I have a small business and I use social media. I'm the only one who maintains it, I do the blogging, the articles, etc. And I always seek for an online advise and tips. And I find your blog so useful and helpful.
Engine Additive
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 01, 2011 at 03:11 AM
raf
Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 19, 2011 at 06:59 AM
magine this:
A previously poorly governed country, like, say former Communist country, experiences a political revolution. The government is democratized, and the economy is turned into a capitalist one, with economic (perhaps especially import) liberalization as well as financial liberalization.Wholesale Beads
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 07, 2011 at 10:03 PM
The empirical relationship between trade protection and economic growth is surprisingly fragile, as shown in a number of other papers. After demonstrating this empirical sensitivity, we address one possible explanation for these findings....
Project Management Firms
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 16, 2011 at 09:09 AM
http://www.ghdstyle-au.com/ghds.html
http://www.chihairflatirons.us
http://www.ghdsoutlet.com
http://www.googleghdhair.com
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 04, 2011 at 10:31 PM
The sample of countries is a group of mostly developed countries over the period of 1875-1913.
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 25, 2011 at 01:31 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks for this ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 07, 2011 at 10:00 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 02:42 PM
male enhancement products
Posted by: Alexander Crawford Enhancementfact | September 30, 2011 at 01:45 AM
Nice Post amazing information and attractive, I like your way of thinking keep on sharing good things to your friends.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 10, 2011 at 01:55 PM
powerpoint corrupt
Good Post.It's really helpful & interesting
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 23, 2012 at 03:51 AM
Whether you need any help in giving a finishing touch to your papers or writing the difficult chapters or need the analysis of those critical assignments, you can take help from us anywhere anytime.
Professional Paper Writing
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 30, 2012 at 01:39 PM