Guillermo Calvo is one of our smartest, most insightful thinkers on international finance. I have never thought of him as one who would favor capital controls, and so was surprised to read his contribution to the most recent VoxEU.org publication. Calvo argues that capital controls have a role to play both in minimizing capital flight during the current crisis, and more generally in calmer time:
5) Liquidity credit lines like the ones implemented by the Fed and the Fund are twoedged swords. On one hand, they may help to stave off a currency/bank run. On the other hand, however, under worldwide deleveraging they could enhance the probability and size of a run....
[Therefore] credit lines should be accompanied by foreign exchange and banking regulations that limit the extent of capital flight.
6) The new Bretton Woods institutions should be more tolerant of controls on capital mobility, especially as those controls centre on limiting the actions of the banking sector.
I had to check back several times to see if the author of these lines was really Guillermo Calvo...
As Keynes once said, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"
UPDATE: Calvo explains a bit more:
I am not sure I changed my mind very radically because I also talk about the benefits of capital controls in my old imperfect credibility papers. I admit, however, that I became skeptical about controls (especially on
capital INFLOWS) as I studied Sudden Stops and realized that, for instance, in 1998 Chile had the largest Sudden Stop in LAC despite controls (see my paper with Talvi, NBER 11153). In the article you refer to, the focus is on capital OUTFLOWS. The concern is that IN THE CONTEXT OF A GLOBAL CREDIT CRUNCH, high-collateral agents may short domestic currency to relieve their dollar liquidity needs. This
happened in Brazil, Chile and Peru during the 1998 episode. To counteract that I basically have in mind banking regulations that would make that sort of shorting more expensive during a GLOBAL CREDIT CRUNCH episode.More in general, I believe that a financial crisis of the magnitude that we are experiencing is an indication that, at least momentarily, the capital market is seriously dysfunctional. This is the context in which second-best proposition may be a useful guide to policy. But don't expect me to start proposing a clever new policy for every second-best triangle I can find !
Um, did the facts on financial instability and capital controls really change?
Posted by: ASH | November 12, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Maybe is time to blindy support any iniciative that cames from the goverment...
Posted by: Camiseta | November 12, 2008 at 01:09 PM
Let us be very clear, there are two very different types of capital controls.
The controls on capitals going in, and the controls on capitals going out.
I have always been a staunch supporter of controls on the capitals going in, so that our small bathtubs do not spill over when inundated by the waves of the global financial oceans; like those controls used in Chile before these were banned by the free trade agreement with the US.
I have always opposed controls on capital going the way out, as that usually only stops governments from doing what they should do.
Capital flight is frequently the last option for a responsible citizen that loves his country!
Posted by: Per Kurowski | November 12, 2008 at 03:17 PM
"As Keynes once said, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"
I think that this remark is misunderstood. In this case, he would expect Calvo to change his mind. Next time, when regulations against capital flight cause more harm than good, Calvo will change his mind again. Keynes didn't have a lot of faith in predicting the future.
Posted by: Don the libertarian Democrat | November 12, 2008 at 04:50 PM
Keynes and Harry Dexter White, too, recognised the difficulties of making capital controls effective. They made proposals whereby receiving countries would co-operate in enforcing controls on capital flight. One element of this co-operation would involve the receiving countries sharing information with the countries suffering the outflows: giving the sending countries relevant information about the foreign holdings of the sending countries' citizens. They put this requirement into their initial drafts of the IMF Articles of Agreement. White even suggested that the receiving countries should refuse to accept capital flight without the sending country government's permission. Both proposals were strongly opposed by the US financial community (which had done very well out of capital flight in the 1930s, thank you very much) and their lobbying was successful; the eventual IMF Articles of Agreement were heavily watered down from Keynes' and White's original proposals. Secrecy is one of the most powerful motives/lures for capital flight, so an attempt to increase transparency of cross-border flows would seriously curb it; not only that, it would also lessen the harmful impact of the outflows, by giving the governments that are suffering capital flight the opportunity to tax the income on that lost capital. It would be relatively straightforward to make a strong case, politically (and morally and legally), for a crackdown on cross-border financial secrecy. So why are so few people advovating this so far? Beats me. It would seem like an obvious thing to do.
Posted by: Nicholas Shaxson | November 13, 2008 at 04:09 AM
Henry Paulson has been ridiculed by one or two commentators for his allusion to Keynes' statement that when the facts change, he changes his mind.
But what is so bad about that? Although he came over time to have a well-developed economic theory, Keynes was clearly an advocate during the Great Depression of trying practical steps to fight the Depression until something worked.
We should not today belittle economic policy-makers who, in the face of the greatest financial and perhaps economic crisis since the Depression, try good ideas. It sure beats doing nothing!
One of the most important lessons from Keynes - extremely topical with the G20 meeting about to happen - is the importance of international economic cooperation. As others have been pointing out, Keynes advocated internationally coordinated economic policies (e.g. monetary or fiscal stimulus), and effective international economic institutions like those he helped create at Bretton Woods that would help to provide conflict-reducing and stabilizing management of the international economy. He thought that if this couldbe achieved, then free trade was very desirable. (All this is set out in Donald Markwell's book "John Maynard Keynes and International Relations". He is interesting also on the discussions during WW2 which Nicholas Shaxson refers to, in the creation of the IMF.)
In the face of a wildly unpredictable wave of financial and economic problems - the worst roller-coaster since 1929 - Paulson has helped provide leadership, both nationally and internationally, so far, and we need to strongly encourage the Obama administration to provide strong US leadership in international cooperation over the months and years ahead. I am sure that Keynes would have supported this.
Is it so wrong to allude to the sensible attitude of one of the greatest economists and practical economic policy-makers ever?
Posted by: Susan Chan | November 13, 2008 at 07:33 AM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 01:35 AM
The good news, thank you!
Not everyone can provide the appropriate flow of information, thanks.
Posted by: dunk shoes | March 25, 2010 at 10:30 PM
GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | April 21, 2010 at 11:00 PM
Adrenaline which a person feels when riding a roller coaster, it is incomparable with any other emotion, is simply phenomenal.
Posted by: propecia online | April 27, 2010 at 04:16 PM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 05, 2010 at 11:00 PM
The good news, thank you!
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 16, 2010 at 06:57 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 10:20 AM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. Came across your blog when I was searching bing I have found the bit of info that
I found to be quite useful.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 09:01 PM
Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website. However, I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.
Posted by: jordans for sale | August 23, 2010 at 09:01 PM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 07:51 PM
i admire this for along time Dani well done
Posted by: فيس بوك | December 04, 2010 at 08:17 AM
raf
Thanks so much.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 19, 2011 at 07:13 AM
http://www.ghdstyle-au.com/ghds.html
http://www.chihairflatirons.us
http://www.ghdsoutlet.com
http://www.googleghdhair.com
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 04, 2011 at 10:41 PM
raf
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 25, 2011 at 01:42 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks for this ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 07, 2011 at 10:05 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 02:43 PM
The positive comments and do well wishes are very motivational and greatly appreciated.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 10, 2011 at 02:29 PM
powerpoint file corrupted
Thanks for the interesting article!
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 28, 2012 at 02:27 AM