OK, I am re-reading The Economist (even a broken clock shows the correct time twice a day, right?) and in its latest issue Zanny Minton Beddoes gets the big picture right, I think:
Global integration, in large part, has been about the triumph of markets over governments. That process is now being reversed in three important ways.
First, Western finance will be re-regulated. At a minimum, the most freewheeling areas of modern finance, such as the $55 trillion market for credit derivatives, will be brought into the regulatory orbit. Rules on capital will be overhauled to reduce leverage and enhance the system’s resilience. America’s labyrinth of overlapping regulators will be reordered....
That leads to the second point: the balance between state and market is changing in areas other than finance. For many countries a more momentous shock over the past couple of years has been the soaring price of commodities, which politicians have also blamed on financial speculation. The food-price spike in late 2007 and early 2008 caused riots in some 30 countries. In response, governments across the emerging world extended their reach, increasing subsidies, fixing prices, banning exports of key commodities and, in India’s case, restricting futures trading. Concern about food security, particularly in India and China, was one of the main reasons why the Doha round of trade negotiations collapsed this summer.
Third, America is losing economic clout and intellectual authority. Just as emerging economies are shaping the direction of global trade, so they will increasingly shape the future of finance. That is particularly true of capital-rich creditor countries such as China....
The real important points here are 1 and 3, I think, while point 2 is a bit of a red herring. What is striking about the government response to the food crisis is how little of it there has been on balance, rather than how much. And Doha collapsed not because governments suddenly became enamored of protection, but because there was too little on the table for big countries like India and China for them to compromise on their offers.
But then Zanny follows up with the following, which reads almost like a parody of The Economist:
The big question is what lessons the emerging students—and the disgraced teacher—should learn from recent events. How far should the balance between governments and markets shift? ... Provocative as it may sound in today’s febrile and dangerous climate, freer and more flexible markets will still do more for the world economy than the heavy hand of government.
OK, I grant that "freer and more flexible" is better than "heavy handed" but that would be true regardless of what follows after these qualifiers. This isn't analysis; it's ideology.
Not at all, on the contrary, it is the ideological convenience of many that now hinders them from seeing that nothing even remotely close to this crisis would have happened, had not the regulators empowered the credit rating agencies and had these not certified as AAA those securities.
Be reasonable. How on earth was a bank, for instance in Germany, supposed to know how bad the collaterals of subprime mortgages really were? Should they have sent their own Herr Inspektor to California to check up on whether the debtor was telling all the truth regarding his income? Of course not!
And why should the German bank distrust for a second the credit rating agencies, when their own regulators had nominated the credit rating agencies for such a delicate matter as establishing the minimum capital requirements for the German bank itself.
Yes, I agree, the regulations of the shadow banks were missing, but, with respect to the banks, the regulators went way overboard, regulating.
UNCTAD, who no one could accuse of overly libertarian, in their policy brief titled “The Crisis of the Century”, released on October 6 states “There are a few quick regulatory fixes that can be taken at both the national and international levels. The first is to reassess the role of credit rating agencies. These agencies, which should solve information problems and increase transparency, seem to have played the opposite role and made the market even more opaque.”
Posted by: Per Kurowski | October 09, 2008 at 10:24 PM
Question:
"When the facts change, I change my mind, what does The Economist do, sir?"
Answer:
Same old bankrupt ideology despite all the financial crises we've seen since 1998, and repeated dysfunction from financial systems that are too clever by half.
Keep up the excellent work Dr. Rodrik! The world needs more of your economic analysis. Much more.
Posted by: Robert Moss | October 10, 2008 at 08:17 AM
I think the horse has permanently left the barn. There is too much money sloshing around in the unregulated parts of the world (Russia, the petro states, China, etc.) for "speculation" to be reined in.
All that will happen is new avenues will be found to replace the existing ones. Perhaps this means that the big western financial firms will not be part of the next cycle, but a next cycle there will be.
The multinational firms and the state controlled (directly or indirectly) resource enterprises are now bigger than most governments. Soros demonstrated a decade ago that the concentrated power of currency speculators could overwhelm the British government's currency policy - and there was only a few billion dollars involved.
Now the amount of money involved is much bigger and the mechanisms for shifting resources around the planet more highly refined. Compare the change in the nominal value of the world's oil reserves as the price has gone from $90 to $140 and back to $90. This change in value dwarfs the "meltdown" in the value of the US banking sector's assets, yet no one has commented on it.
If there is to be real reform there needs to be the equivalent of an effective world "government". So far the UN, WTO, WB and IMF have proven ineffective. Since no state is willing to give up any of its sovereignty it is unlikely that a new body will do better.
In addition tax havens need to be eliminated and laws about incorporation and governance across borders need to be systematized. When Switzerland, the Channel Islands and other black holes of finance are invaded and taken over by the regulatory authorities we will see a change.
Since this will never happen (too many billionaires like the present system) there is little prospect for fundamental regulatory change on an international level.
Posted by: robertdfeinman | October 10, 2008 at 08:27 AM
Moss, did you steal that from Keynes or Wolf?
I do agree thougt
Posted by: saku | October 11, 2008 at 04:59 AM
1. James Buchanan wrote a paper whose title - though referring to a different context - sums it up nicely: Market Failure vs. Government Failure. It's not the "flexible" markets vs. the "heavy handed" government. Both sides are imperfect and - it seems - in times of crisis, government is the more robust system.
2. So what should government do in this crisis? As Warren Buffett put it: now when everybody is deleveraging, government has to leverage up. Government, he added, is the only one who can always do this. He failed to mention that the government's ability to leverage up depends on its ability to tax, which depends (among other things) on the legitimacy of its cause in the eyes of the public. Legitimacy: abuse it, and you lose it. Probably the majority of governments worldwide has lost (or never had) the ability to leverage up at will. Neither should we take it for granted that we will have it forever.
Posted by: Martin Klein | October 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM
The section of the final paragraph that you quote from the article in The Economist omits the arguments that The Economist makes (through the course of several articles in its Special Report) to suport its claim that freer and more flexible markets are better for the world economy than government intervention.
The full paragraph reads as follows:
"The big question is what lessons the emerging students—and the disgraced teacher—should learn from recent events. How far should the balance between governments and markets shift? This special report will argue that although some rebalancing is needed, particularly in financial regulation, where innovation outpaced a sclerotic supervisory regime, it would be a mistake to blame today’s mess only, or even mainly, on modern finance and “free-market fundamentalism”. Speculative excesses existed centuries before securitisation was invented, and governments bear direct responsibility for some of today’s troubles. Misguided subsidies, on everything from biofuels to mortgage interest, have distorted markets. Loose monetary policy helped to inflate a global credit bubble. Provocative as it may sound in today’s febrile and dangerous climate, freer and more flexible markets will still do more for the world economy than the heavy hand of government."
To claim that freer markets are better than government intervetion without analysis would be ideology; to claim that The Economist states that freer markets are better than government intervetion without analysis by quoting an incomplete passage is either sloppy scholarship, or just plain dishonest.
Posted by: The Walrus | October 12, 2008 at 05:24 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 02:35 AM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 06, 2010 at 12:42 AM
Nice news,thanks you for this good sharing.
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 08, 2010 at 07:42 AM
This http://www.p90xmall.com low-impact cardio routine can be used in a variety of ways to meet your P90X goals. Use it in addition to your standard P90X workload when you want to http://www.p90xmall.com burn some extra calories, or as a substitute if your body needs a break from the program's high-impact workouts. http://www.p90xmall.com Whatever your reason for using Cardio X, you'll find it to be a fun, full-throttle, fat burning workout that will leave you feeling lean and mean. http://www.p90xmall.com
Posted by: p90x workout | May 14, 2010 at 02:01 AM
私はアメリカではないので、ブログの記事は、よく書かれて、私はとても好き読み取り、すべての単語の私は非常に理解、ほとんどまだ読んでいないが、私はあなたの資料では、知識を学ぶことを望んでまた、我々は良い友達になることを願って。ありがとうございました! !
Posted by: replica rolex paypal | May 20, 2010 at 03:05 AM
There were timberland 6 inch sensitivity and a beauty to her that have nothing to do with timberland 6 inch boots looks. She was one to be listened to, whose words were so easy to take to timberland boots sale heart.I used to find notes left in the collection basket, beautiful timberland boots outlet notes about my homilies and about the writer's black timberland boots thoughts on the daily scriptural readings. The person who penned the notes mens timberland boots would add reflections to my thoughts and would always include some timberland pro boots quotes from poets and mystics he or she had white timberland boots read and remembered and loved. The notes fascinated black timberland shoes uk me. Here was someone immersed in a search for truth and beauty. Words had been cheap timberland boots treasured, words that were beautiful. And I felt as if the words timberland waterproof boots somehow delighted in being discovered, for they were obviously very generous to the as yet anonymous timberland work boots writer of the notes. And now this person was in turn learning the secret of sharing them. Beauty so shines when given away. The only truth that exists timberland hiking boots is, in that sense, free. http://www.timberland6inch.com/
Posted by: timberland 6 inch boots | July 06, 2010 at 03:03 AM
There were timberland 6 inch sensitivity and a beauty to her that have nothing to do with timberland 6 inch boots looks. She was one to be listened to, whose words were so easy to take to timberland boots sale heart.I used to find notes left in the collection basket, beautiful timberland boots outlet notes about my homilies and about the writer's black timberland boots thoughts on the daily scriptural readings. The person who penned the notes mens timberland boots would add reflections to my thoughts and would always include some timberland pro boots quotes from poets and mystics he or she had white timberland boots read and remembered and loved. The notes fascinated black timberland shoes uk me. Here was someone immersed in a search for truth and beauty. Words had been cheap timberland boots treasured, words that were beautiful. And I felt as if the words timberland waterproof boots somehow delighted in being discovered, for they were obviously very generous to the as yet anonymous timberland work boots writer of the notes. And now this person was in turn learning the secret of sharing them. Beauty so shines when given away. The only truth that exists timberland hiking boots is, in that sense, free. http://www.timberland6inch.com/
Posted by: timberland 6 inch | July 16, 2010 at 08:37 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 10:39 AM
I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 08:45 PM
Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website. However, I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.
Posted by: jordans for sale | August 23, 2010 at 08:55 PM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 07:37 PM
raf
Thanks for article.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 19, 2011 at 08:45 AM
http://www.ghdstyle-au.com/ghds.html
http://www.chihairflatirons.us
http://www.ghdsoutlet.com
http://www.googleghdhair.com
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 05, 2011 at 12:48 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 02:30 PM
Thanks for the informative writing. Would mind updating some good tips about it. I still wait your next place. ;)
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 11:36 AM
Good post!
SELL YOUR HOUSE NASHVILLE
Posted by: SellHouseNash | June 12, 2012 at 01:50 PM