More on alter-globalization

In an earlier post, I reported some of my quick reactions to Robin Broad's and John Cavanagh's new book Development Redefined: How the Market Met its Match.  Robin and John thought I had caricatured their argument and sent in some comments.  I am happy to reproduce them here, with their permission:

First of all, terminology. As we explain (and as Robin wrote in her previous book, Global Backlash: Citizen Initiatives for a Just World Economy), the term “anti-globalization” is a faulty one. Anyone who observes and analyzes these movements on-the-ground across the globe will discover this. So we, like many others, opt for the more accurate “alter-globalization movement” (taken from the French). This term purposely is meant to convey the reality that such movements combine “alternatives” to economic globalization (for instance, against the globalization of local water resources in Canada and Bolivia) and “alternative ways to globalize economically (for instance, “fair trade” initiatives, corporate codes of conduct, social clauses, etc.)  As the latter suggests, this is not merely a “self sufficiency” model (as your review suggests) – although it is absolutely true that in certain countries such as Thailand, there is a growing movement (that includes the Thai king) to turn from reliance on the global market to increased local production.

This relates also to your caricature of what we’re pushing for as being “romantic” or even worse. As our book stresses, the key thing is not our views (or your views) but the alter-globalization initiatives happening across the globe at local, national, regional, and global levels. The proof is in the pudding.

We do want you and readers of your blog to understand that we (and those involved with these alternatives) are not romancing the past or rural life. But the current food crisis certainly supports the alter-globalization’s focus on increased food sovereignty. “Modernization” of agriculture in the southern Philippines, for instance, has been to the benefit of agribusiness corporations, seed/fertilizer/pesticide companies but not to the average farmer.

We also hope you will let your readers know that our book is not simply an economic critique of the neoliberal development model. Rather, our focus is economic, social and environmental.  We also do not ignore statistics on poverty, inequality, etc. One of our chapters disaggregates what’s happened to inequality within and among countries. In another chapter, our critique builds on fine work by UNDP disputing some of the calculations of extreme poverty rates. New “revised” poverty figures support us. 

We can’t help but add that the current moment in history seems to underscore our main points: market fundamentalism was faulty economically, socially and environmentally. (And, indeed, although our book is more political economy than straight economics – good careful economic analysis would have included those social and environmental costs initially to reveal the bankruptcy of that development model.)  And the post-World-War-II public institutions built to manage the global economy are currently in deep crises – financial crises as well as crises of legitimacy.

Time and time again, over the last 2-3 decades, the mainstream development establishment (by the way, we don’t include you in this category) has ignored and ostracized critics (both academic critics and on-the-ground critics). But, time and time again, the critics have been right. Witness the food crisis, the climate change crisis, the financial crisis, as well, of course, as the development crisis.

Comments

[Marco Antonio Moreno]

The market fundamentalism is flawed, and also Friedman's monetary theory. But it has dominated economic policy in recent decades. Please read

http://www.elblogsalmon.com/2008/10/22-fundamentalismo-y-realismo-en-economia
and
http://www.elblogsalmon.com/2008/10/24-la-caida-de-un-avion-en-llamas
thanks

[Richard H. Serlin]

"But, time and time again, the critics have been right. Witness the food crisis, the climate change crisis, the financial crisis, as well, of course, as the development crisis."

"the food crisis" is nothing compared to the hunger before globalization. Compare hunger in China today to hunger in China before the recent era of globalization.

"the climate change crisis" -- this is essentially due to reasons other than globalization, and certainly is possible to combat without getting rid of globalization. It's like saying that modern technology is the cause of globalization, so everyone should go back to living like cavemen. It would solve global warming, but it would cause mass starvation, and for the tiny percentage of the world that survived, it would make life harsh, miserable, and short, about 30 years.

Also, because of the efficiencies of globalization, science and technology advance substantially faster, speeding up solutions from safe nuclear, to solar, to exotic heat deflection and carbon eating.

"the financial crisis" -- again, not really due to globalization, and it's certainly possible to solve this and prevent future incidents without decreasing globalization. Transparency laws, good regulation, and smart central bank strategy would do it.

"the development crisis" has been tremendously decreased by globalization -- India and China are such large and amazing examples it's hard to believe you could think this.

In general, free trade is extremely good for poorer countries, but it's very true that it depends greatly on the accompanying programs, laws, and governance, for example to make sure that the benefits are widespread. And, of course, a lot of the non-free trade things added to free trade agreements are bad, like increased enforcement of drug patents for very poor countries, but the free trade part itself has been a crucial factor in lifting hundreds of billions out of the most extreme poverty. We just need to improve the side agreements and make these agreements freer in the things that can really help the poor, like in dropping first world agriculture tariffs and subsidies.

[Richard H. Serlin]

Ok, my comment late night the other night had some mechanical errors. Here's a new version with fixes, other improvements, and additions, which I've also posted on my blog:

"the food crisis" is nothing compared to the hunger before globalization. Compare hunger in China today to hunger in China before the era of globalization.

"the climate change crisis" – This is essentially due to reasons other than globalization, and certainly is possible to combat without getting rid of globalization. It's like saying that modern technology is the cause of climate change, so everyone should go back to living like cavemen. It would solve global warming, but it would cause mass starvation, and for the tiny percentage of the world that survived, it would make life harsh, miserable, and short, with an average lifespan of about 30 years. Economists would call discarding all technology a "next best solution" to the problem of global warming. It would solve global warming, but there are other ways to solve this problem at less cost, in this case at immensely less cost.

Global warming can easily be combatted effectively without getting rid of globalization, and in fact, because of the efficiencies and wealth creation of globalization, science and technology advance substantially faster, speeding up solutions, from safe nuclear, to solar, to exotic heat deflection and genetically engineered carbon eating algae. These solutions are also made cheaper by globalization, and therefore more widely adopted. The costs of solar, wind, and nuclear power, for example, are highly dependent on scale, and a global scale is far bigger than any local scale.

"the financial crisis" – again, not really due to globalization, and it's certainly possible to solve this and prevent future incidents without decreasing globalization. Transparency laws, good regulation, and smart central bank strategy would do it, and they're a far better solution than getting rid of, decreasing, or not increasing globalization. Diminishing globalization is again a next best solution.

"the development crisis" – My first thought when hearing this was that Broad's and Cavanagh meant the crisis from lack of development. My thoughts run this way because I care a lot more about people than rocks, trees, and butterfly eggs. I'm funny that way. The lack of development crisis has been tremendously decreased by globalization -- India and China are such large and amazing examples it would be hard to believe they could think otherwise. If, however, they meant environmental issues by "the development crisis", stopping globalization might help the environment – maybe – in the short run, but it's been overwhelmingly shown that the wealthier a country gets, after the point of basic industrialization, the cleaner it gets.

Environmental cleanliness is a luxury good. The wealthier people get, the more they're willing to spend on it, and globalization has been shown over the long run to be by far more effective than anything else in making poor countries wealthier – China, India, South Korea, Taiwan, etc., etc.

In general, free trade is extremely good for poorer countries over the long run, but it's very true that it depends greatly on the accompanying programs, laws, and governance, for example to make sure that the benefits are widespread and any negative effects are minimized. Nonetheless, as Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman, a staunch liberal, wrote of Globalization in a 1997 Slate article (http://www.slate.com/id/1918):

These improvements have not taken place because well-meaning people in the West have done anything to help--foreign aid, never large, has lately shrunk to virtually nothing. Nor is it the result of the benign policies of national governments, which are as callous and corrupt as ever. It is the indirect and unintended result of the actions of soulless multinationals and rapacious local entrepreneurs, whose only concern was to take advantage of the profit opportunities offered by cheap labor. It is not an edifying spectacle; but no matter how base the motives of those involved, the result has been to move hundreds of millions of people from abject poverty...

End quote

It should also be noted that a lot of the non-free trade things added to free trade agreements are bad, like increased enforcement of drug patents for very poor countries, but the free trade part itself has been a crucial factor in lifting hundreds of millions out of the most extreme poverty. We just need to improve the side agreements, and make these agreements freer in the things that can really help the poor, like by dropping first world agriculture tariffs and subsidies.

[Sandro Perricelli]

"These countries are the casualty of financial excesses that are not the result of their own doing. So we emphasize that access to the SLF will be available to all developing countries that are adversely affected by the financial turbulence emanating from the subprime fallout."

This has to be a joke.

Any international financial architecture where more than 1 cent is out at risk to rescue the finances of the current regimes of Venezuela or Argentina is an international financial architecture that reflects a world that does not deserve positive economic growth.

[Sandro Perricelli]

"These countries are the casualty of financial excesses that are not the result of their own doing. So we emphasize that access to the SLF will be available to all developing countries that are adversely affected by the financial turbulence emanating from the subprime fallout."

This has to be a joke.

Any international financial architecture where more than 1 cent is out at risk to rescue the finances of the current regimes of Venezuela or Argentina is an international financial architecture that reflects a world that does not deserve positive economic growth.

[soft play]

I love reading articles about globalization. Please share more with us! Thank you.

[ghd]

The good news, thank you!
Not everyone can provide the appropriate flow of information, thanks.

[rolex watches]

People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com

[ghd straighteners]

GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.

[birkenstock]

Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.

[p90x workout]

Potent http://www.p90xmall.com combination of pressing, curling, http://www.p90xmall.com and fly movements, that will leave you stronger. http://www.p90xmall.com

[Patch panel]

http://www.nzsbbearings.com/ ball bearings
http://www.nwmwatermeters.com/ water meter
http://www.aircompressorhs.com/ Air compressor
http://www.watermeteryx.com/ water meter
http://www.hyinvestmentcasting.com Investment Castings
http://www.botebearings.com/ Ball Bearings
http://www.pneumatic-esp.com Pneumatic fittings
http://www.networkcablingnks.com Patch panel

[soocuu]

http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2008/10/more-on-alter-globalization.html?no_prefetch=1

[ghdstraighteners-au]

ghd hair straightener's new rounder barrel means creating intricate styles such as curls and flicks is easier to do and this styler is currently the market leader in hair stylers.visit ghdstraighteners-au to know more.

[ghdstraighteners-au]

ghd hair straightener gives you peace of mind by turning off if the ghd IV styler is left unattended for 30 minutes,choose auto sleep mode ghd hair straightener.
http://www.ghdstraighteners-au.com/
ghd hair straightener

[lachou]

I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm

[authentic jordans]

Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website. However, I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.

[jordan shoes]

This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.

[ball valves]

We are a professional valve manufacturer,
http://www.tradevalves.com
specializes in all kinds of industrial valve, consistent conformed to international and national standards, we gained worldwide market, the past years, 90% of our products supply for Europe,America,Middle east,South east China.

[Volumerates.com]

we gained worldwide market, the past years, 90% of our products supply for Europe,America,Middle east,South east China.

[ps3break]

This is an interesting post. While the major labels work out new business models, there exists today many legal ways for innovators to create music services within the existing legal framework. Go to http://www.volumerates.com/ for more.

[new balance]

Don't part with your illusions . When they are gone you may still exist , but you have ceased to live.

[Headboards and Footboards]

i think it is a great insite there thanks!

[Account Deleted]

raf

Thanks for article.

[Account Deleted]

http://www.ghdstyle-au.com/ghds.html
http://www.chihairflatirons.us
http://www.ghdsoutlet.com
http://www.googleghdhair.com

[Mbtmbtshoes]

but a verb, a complex life process, do not be afraid of making mistakes, not afraid inconsistencies, even afraid of self cancelled. A kind of thought only withstand the chaos and noisy human life can have the vitality and strength.
http://www.coachusaonline.com/

[Account Deleted]

Raf
raf

I like it ... Thanks !!

[Account Deleted]

globalization does good to the world economic development.

Internet filter for Mac

[Account Deleted]

Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano

[Gwormd]

Seems like an excellent offer additional Obama career assasination. Skin Ringworm

[Account Deleted]

I'm still learning from you, but I'm trying to achieve my goals. I certainly enjoy reading all that is posted on your blog.Keep the information coming. I loved it!

organic seo service