I have never had much luck with fact checkers. I remember in particular an experience about ten years ago, when a fact checker from The New Yorker called to ask me if a forthcoming article's description of me as "a young economist at Harvard" was correct. I told him that I was indeed an economist and that I was employed by Harvard. As for being young, I just told him my age. When the article was published, I had become just "an economist at Harvard." I took this quite hard--remember this was a decade ago!--until someone reminded me that anyone above 30 is likely to seem "old" to a person of the average age of fact checkers at The New Yorker.
So when I got a call from a fact checker at the New York Times magazine last week who wanted to confirm, among other things, that I was not "antitrade," I did not take it as a good omen. The answer was, "that is correct, I am not antitrade." I could have tried to explain how meaningless this characterization is: You can be anti-WTO, anti-trade agreements, anti-free trade, but anti-trade? I don't know of a single soul who wants to move the U.S. to autarky. But I was talking to a fact checker, and the discussion would have been pointless. She wanted to know "just the facts."
In any case, you can judge the result yourself.
I had to laugh at the closing paragraph as it touts the old canard that everyone wins from free trade. Maybe the next time a fact checker calls, just hang up the phone.
Posted by: pgl | June 14, 2008 at 06:01 AM
I had to laugh at the closing paragraph as it touts the old canard that everyone wins from free trade. Maybe the next time a fact checker calls, just hang up the phone.
Posted by: pgl | June 14, 2008 at 06:01 AM
Something has happened to the NY Times over the past decade. It used to be a Main Street Republican leaning publication with a dollop of leftist concern for the poor and disadvantaged. This made sense, the owners were from socially liberal NY Jewish families who had a tradition of concern for such interests, but were now economically in the wealthy capitalist class and thus allied economically with big business.
The family still controls the paper, but it is a new generation and, having grown up in wealth, they have moved more rightward on economic matters. This is most easily seen in their choices for the op-ed pundits where neo-cons predominate, as well as their installation of hard right wingers as the editors of both the Sunday Magazine and Book Review sections.
They also give too much space to libertarian economists (or play-acting economists like Ben Stein) in the business section.
So it should not be surprising that a staffer at the magazine wouldn't know enough to realize that the question was meaningless or biased and assumed a certain framing for the piece they were publishing.
Is it any wonder that the press is now held in such low regard? Judith Miller was just a symptom of a paper infected with ideology and trying to make reality fit.
Posted by: robertdfeinman | June 14, 2008 at 09:09 AM
Like I said a few times before and as I'm sure you've heard from others far more qalified than me:
When thoughtful nuanced economists nit-pick at trade, you do indeed give weight to and embolden un-nuanced protectionists whose true views are very, very different from yours....people you once said were referred to as "barabarians" by a colleague of yours.
Remember Ron Paul is anti-Nafta and so are many far left poliiticians in Congress...but the reasons for that position couldn't be any more different.
National discourse is dumbed down and there's little room for detail. You shouldn't be surprised to get these kinds of questions.
You may be quibbling over means but the result is always going to be a impression by the masses that you are disputing general ends.
The general public isn't really going to grasp or care why and where you quibble with the consensus of "free traders"....or care about the nunaced difference between different kinds of free traders for that matter.
The over simplified and soundbyte-style result is going to be that you disagree with free traders and hence will be taken as validiation for the argument of protectionists.
Yes, it's not fair. But that's the way it is.
Posted by: John V | June 14, 2008 at 12:43 PM
If everyone is benefitting from free trade, why have working-class wages declined steadily since 1981 (exception noted: they pretty much kept pace with everyone else from ca. 1995-2001).
I'm not the greatest at basic economics, but I'd give odds that the tangent of the Income-Consumption Utility curve that has a tangent at 100/95 is higher than the one tangential to 93/95. Yet Loewenstein seems to think this makes workers "better off."
Should I be returning my M.A.?
Posted by: Ken Houghton | June 15, 2008 at 05:25 PM
As Amartya Sen writes in his "Development as Freedom", to be "anti-trade" is like to be against people talking to one another.
Posted by: Thomas Kang | June 15, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Vefat eden eski arkadasim Sarl Rodrik'in akrabalarini ariyorum, taniyor musunuz?
Posted by: Samil BILGIC | November 14, 2009 at 10:04 PM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 02:23 AM
GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | April 22, 2010 at 01:34 AM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 06, 2010 at 01:02 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lv store | August 12, 2010 at 08:29 AM
I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 08:03 PM
Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website. However, I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.
Posted by: authentic jordans | August 23, 2010 at 08:32 PM
Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website. However, I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.
Posted by: authentic jordans | August 23, 2010 at 08:33 PM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 07:48 PM
I can't believe how much of this I just wasn't aware of. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. I'm truly grateful and really impressed.
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | October 15, 2010 at 06:28 AM
I really enjoyed the blog. To my mind it is really helpful to me and I am sure to all the readers here!
Posted by: ED Hardy | November 05, 2010 at 02:09 AM
raf
Thanks.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 19, 2011 at 11:10 AM
http://www.hermesfantasy.com/
srtyhs
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 19, 2011 at 03:27 AM
http://www.ghdstyle-au.com/ghds.html
http://www.chihairflatirons.us
http://www.ghdsoutlet.com
http://www.googleghdhair.com
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 05, 2011 at 02:14 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you ..
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 06, 2011 at 01:25 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks for comment ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier
sexshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 06:28 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it
sexyshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 06:29 PM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 06:29 PM
OTIMO SITE
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 02:02 PM
You made some good points .I did a little research on the topic and found that most people agree with your blog. Thanks and appreciate to you for your Brilliant effort.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 11:26 AM
It is always nice reading such master piece from master himself. I always enjoy reading articles and learning, as I am well aware that is the solo way to success in any field. I primarily focus on Forex trading and that too needs huge knowledge and experience, it’s extremely easier under OctaFX broker as they got outstanding setting with small spreads at 0.1 pips for all major pairs, over 70 instruments, fast execution, cash back and much more to help out.
Posted by: Jacky | April 29, 2017 at 08:36 PM