I was supposed to be at
this conference, delivering
this paper. Alas, a sick child has kept me home, and away from what I was hoping would be a good discussion. It has also saved Bill Easterly--the co-organizer of the conference--an earful on what I think about his
latest. But more on that later.
Hope the child gets better soon.
Posted by: Barkley Rosser | May 29, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Dear Mr Rodrik I will read your paper this weekend and wish full recovery to your child. I just would like to tell my opinion here. Some of our elites seem to think that common people will necessarily act like them; even they seem to think that Citizens of countries of the other side of the world will act like middle-class Americans or Europeans. The local cultures, customs and behaviors influence significantly the way people react to changes in their environment. I do not think that governments and international institutions can control the economy, they only decide for incentives and finally it is the people decision through their reactions that “decide” what the economy will look like. It is the consumer, or non-consumer, that makes the economy what it is. It is only when experts renounce to act as, and succeed to become prophets issuing eventually self-fulfilling prophecies that they can pretend to have a control over the mechanism. I support scholars and experts who think that economy science should be studied in the field and that interaction within and between populations should be understood before to decide for the right set of incentive to apply.
Posted by: Etienne Calame | May 30, 2008 at 01:50 AM
Thank you for posting this. I've always thought that economists don't talk enough about their children at work. In fact, I've always thought it was unfortunate that one rarely sees children walking up and down the hallways of an economics department.
I do hope the illness is nothing serious and that your son or daughter gets better soon.
Posted by: Anon | May 30, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Dear Dani,
This has nothing to do with your post whatsoever, but I was wondering if you had any advice for good master's programs out there in economics? While MPA/ID seems to be a great program for a public policy career, what about one for an academic career?
Specifically, if you were interested development / political economy, are there any master's programs you would recommend that let would allow someone like me to get a better idea of the field of study, while also taking a bunch of courses that would increase your chances of getting in to a good doctoral program?
Thanks!
Meredith
Posted by: Meredith Galbraith | May 30, 2008 at 02:46 PM
Meredith, there are tons of economics departments out there that have economic development as one of their fields. As for political economy, it's not as common, but I suggest you look at www.econphd.net, which has a rankings page (bit outdated though, 2004) and stroll through department websites looking for your field of interest / specialization.
Posted by: tweek | May 30, 2008 at 06:23 PM
Meredith --
The trouble is that top U.S. departments do not really focus on master's degrees. It's mainly the Ph.D., and if there is a master's program, it's either there as a money maker or as a consolation prize for unsuccessful doctoral students. But in Europe there are good stand-alone master's programs. I would recommend LSE or Toulouse.
Posted by: Dani Rodrik | May 30, 2008 at 06:30 PM
Many Canadian universities offer master's degrees in Economics. UBC and Queen's have strong programs, for example.
Posted by: tgirl | May 30, 2008 at 07:33 PM
Thanks very much! I'm glad I received a reply, I nearly resorted to posting on Mankiw's blog :)
Posted by: Meredith Galbraith | May 30, 2008 at 09:47 PM
Dear Dani:
Your paper's reference to the Chinese inclination to experiment is very useful, especially in the context of the "hard evidence' the random evaluation folks call for.
But it gets me wondering, Why don't more governments do it? I can't help but think there is an "external validity" problem of some form lurking here, having to with the political system, the degree of central control, and the vision of the top leadership. My guess is that China's is a special case. As Lant Pritchett's paper at the conference suggests, experimentation --whether the "hard" type of the MIT poverty lab, or the soft type, is an old idea.
The fact that it's not tried much (at least it seems that way) suggests the devil is in the political details.
Thank you for the excellent paper and the links to the conference.
Posted by: rh | May 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Dr. Rodrik--the Easterly op-ed did not strike me as too constructive, either. I offer a retort on my humble blog that may be in line with you had in mind:
http://ipezone.blogspot.com/2008/05/thoughts-on-world-banks-new-growth.html
Posted by: Emmanuel | May 31, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Meredith -
The economics department at San Jose State University in California has a good evening / weekend master's program. An added benefit is their Austrian school slant :-)
Posted by: Justin Rietz | May 31, 2008 at 06:15 PM
Hi Meredith,
NYU offers a very solid stand alone masters degree program in Economics, perhaps one of the top stand alone econ masters programs in the nation (according to their website).
Duke also has a masters program in Econ I believe.
Chicago has a standalont masters program in social sciences. If you do that program and take a lot of econ profs/get econ prof recs, that may help your chances when you apply to grad school.
hope this helps!
Posted by: cg | June 01, 2008 at 04:48 PM
Dear Dani,
I just finished reading your paper. Other than the external versus internal validity issue, you point out that top journals may not have an incentive to publish the results of two identical randomized evaluations in different settings. Maybe this would have an adverse impact on the academic careers of the randomistas?
There are other practical issues that make it difficult for developing country organisations to carry out a randomized trial at ground level. First, a randomized evaluation is expensive (consulting fees and out-of-pocket expenses of a large team of field researchers plus faculty from an overseas college working in a project location to name the obvious). Few developing country organisations, let alone NGOs in these countries, can afford this unless they are propped up by corporate or donor agency funds (or by the funds of the university where the core team of economists come from).
Second, a randomized evaluation is time consuming and takes a year or more to come up with the final numbers. Donor agency funded projects have shorter timelines to showcase results to both the recipient government and to the government to which it reports to. So these agencies tend to stay away from randomised trials of micro-interventions. (I understand that the World Bank’s OED is now increasing its use of such trials but I haven’t come across a visibly increasing number of World Bank funded trials in India, surely a good place to begin?)
As for NGOs, apart from the prohibitive costs, does it really pay to conduct such a lengthy exercise all for the sake of some numbers? I would wager it does not as NGO funds are hardly dependent on any evaluation. In most cases, they are funded because of their track record of community work, relationship with community heads and local government officials and perceived integrity (many NGOs in India are fly-by-night operations).
For government agencies, the financial aspects are not important but the political implications of randomised trials are. While a case can be made that an evaluation that ‘proves’ the successful effect of an intervention can be used to garner political support for more of that intervention, what happens when an evaluation shows up a generously funded government intervention to have had no or very little effect on the indicators that it was trying to influence? I can safely say that key ministries in the government of India do not want to be put under that sort of scanner. (Could one imagine the Ministry of Health, one of the more notorious ministries in India and recently implicated by the World Bank for massive corruption in drug procurement, open its doors to randomised trials on a large scale?)
Next, take a look at Banerjee and Duflo’s Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (PAL) that has carried out, and is working on, several randomised trials in India. They rope in local NGOs to provide ‘buy-in’ with the local community and a team of Indian field coordinators, typically local boys and girls, to do the spade work of collecting the data. Though I don’t know how these projects are funded by PAL, I am quite sure that these NGOs (e.g. Pratham or Sewa) could not bear the full costs of such evaluations through a period of one year or more. In that case, the funds for the projects are coming out of research grants or from the funds of some usually US university or from corporate firms (or some combination of all three). So it is the researchers who are financially supporting the others to finish the research.
Also, PAL has a good working relationship with a think-tank in Chennai (Institute for Financial Management and Research) that is financially supported by ICICI Bank, one of India’s largest banks. ICICI’s interest is to gain insights into the country’s promising microfinance and rural credit market which it believes can be better understood by randomised evaluations. IFMR is now a place for regular workshops on randomised trials conducted by the PAL team and researchers from other US universities (e.g. Dean Karlan of Yale who also works on microfinance and credit products).
In short, randomised trials will not naturally be taken up by governments, NGOs or donor agencies working in developing countries just because it is ‘internally valid’ because of time, cost and political considerations. In that case, they will be driven by funding from corporate (towards business interests like the pharmaceutical industry) and research funds (towards the publications of young assistant professors) – as is the case with PAL and IFMR.
Best regards,
Ritobaan
New Delhi, India
Posted by: Ritobaan Roy | June 03, 2008 at 09:08 AM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
http://www.watchvisa.com
http://www.watchvisa.com/breitling-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/cartier-watches.html
Posted by: rolex watches | February 25, 2010 at 10:27 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 12:30 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 03:41 AM
GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | April 22, 2010 at 01:41 AM
Thank you for introducing me the useful information.And .....Totally boring. can you tell me where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.thank you!
Posted by: mbt shoes sale | May 05, 2010 at 09:03 PM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 06, 2010 at 01:05 AM
GHD purple is a beautifully wrapped gift set containing limited edition purple GHD IV styler, GHD travel hairdryer,heat resistant purple GHD roll bag,get one for your lover.
http://www.ghdstraighteners-au.com/ ghd iv styler
Posted by: ghdstraighteners-au | July 08, 2010 at 02:03 AM
hank you for introducing me the useful information.And .....Totally boring. can you tell me where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.thank you!
Posted by: lv handbags | August 12, 2010 at 03:28 AM
hank you for introducing me the useful information.And .....Totally boring. can you tell me where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.thank you!
Posted by: lv handbags | August 12, 2010 at 04:43 AM
Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website. However, I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.
Posted by: cheap jordans | August 23, 2010 at 08:44 PM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 08:07 PM
a story
Posted by: ugg boots | September 09, 2010 at 09:00 PM
I was extremely pleased to find this website.I wanted to thank you for this good understand I definitely enjoying every single small bit of it and We've you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | October 01, 2010 at 06:48 AM
I can't believe how much of this I just wasn't aware of. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. I'm truly grateful and really impressed.
Posted by: cheap and high quality handbags | October 15, 2010 at 07:22 AM
Just about the most cherished factor in existence is friendship. By far the most valuable matter in between us is understanding.
Posted by: Cheap Asics Shoes | November 12, 2010 at 02:36 AM
raf
Thanks for your article. Good work.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 20, 2011 at 03:56 AM
Therefore, from the doctor's point of view, "invisible hand" is not everything. There's mastercard. In the lives of the people, why should we often exercise? Exercise is the hope to make the "invisible hand" to play a bigger role.http://www.mbt-usa.com/
MBT
Posted by: Ning Asics | February 12, 2011 at 10:34 PM
columbus injury lawyer
I always enjoy reading your posts and I look forward to your next one.
Posted by: Ron Looker | February 17, 2011 at 10:44 PM
http://www.rolexparty.com/
eradtg
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 20, 2011 at 04:08 AM
Raf
raf
I like it ... Thanks !!
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 29, 2011 at 08:28 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 01:42 PM
Thanks for the informative writing. Would mind updating some good tips about it. I still wait your next place. ;)
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 02:22 PM