Development economics is split between macro- and micro-development economists. The former focus on economic growth and tend to analyze economy-wide policies such as trade, fiscal, and currency policies. Think Anne Krueger, Jeff Sachs, Bill Easterly, Paul Collier. The latter focus on individual-level outcomes and analyze microfinance, education, health and other social policies. Think Angus Deaton, Mark Rosenzweig, Michael Kremer, or Esther Duflo. The first group relies on cross-country econometrics or analytical country studies. The second relies increasingly on randomized field experiments. Ostensibly, both groups share the same objective: achieving sustainable improvement in standards of living of the poor. But the way they go about it seems so different as to make them look like members of entirely different disciplines.
My latest paper argues that there is both good and bad news on this front:
The good news is that there is substantial convergence in the policy mindset exhibited by micro evaluation enthusiasts, on the one hand, and growth diagnosticians, on the other. The emerging “consensus” revolves not around a specific list of policies, but around how one does development policy. In fact, practitioners of this “new” development economics—whether of the “macro” type or “micro” type—tend to be suspicious of claims to ex ante knowledge about what works and what does not work. The answer is neither the Washington Consensus nor any specific set of initiatives in health or education. What is required instead is recognition of the contextual nature of policy solutions. Relative ignorance calls for an approach that is explicitly experimental, and which is carried out using the tools of diagnostics and evaluation. Old dichotomies between states and markets play little role in this worldview and pragmatism reigns. The proof of the pudding is in the eating: if something works, it is worth doing.
This convergence has remained largely hidden from view, because the analytical and empirical tools used by economists at the macro and micro end of things—growth economists versus social policy economists—tend to be quite different. But I will make the case that there is indeed such a convergence, that it is a significant departure from the approaches that dominated thinking about development policy until a decade or so ago, and that it represents a significant advance over the previous generation of research.
The bad news is that there has been an accentuation of the methodological divergence between macro-development economists and micro-development economists, which threatens to overshadow the convergence on policy. In particular, the randomized field trials revolution led by researchers in and around the MIT Poverty Action Lab (Banerjee 2007, Duflo 2006, Duflo, Glennerster, and Kremer 2006) has greatly enriched the micro end of the field, while creating bigger barriers between the two camps. This is not just because randomization is rarely possible with the policies—such as trade, monetary, and fiscal—that macro-development economists study. More importantly, it is because of the raising of the stakes with regard to what counts as “admissible” evidence in development. The “randomistas” (as Deaton [2007] has called them) tend to think that credible evidence can be generated only with randomized field trials (or when nature cooperates by providing the opportunity of a “natural” experiment)....
In fact, the micro experimentalists tend to overstate how much we learn from randomized trials and underestimate how much we learn from other types of evidence.
The question we need to pose of any piece of research is the Bayesian one: does the finding change our priors on the question we are interested in? Randomized evaluations do pretty well when they are targeted closely at the policy change under consideration, but less so when they require considerable extrapolation. In the latter case, evidence from randomized field experiments need not be more informative than other types of evidence which may have less airtight causal identification but are stronger on external validity (because of broader geographical or temporal coverage). In practice internal validity—just like external validity—is not an either-or matter; some studies do better than others on this score than others, and deserve more of our attention on that account. But this preference has to be tempered with a consideration also of external validity. The bottom line is that randomized evaluations do not deserve monopoly rights—or even necessarily pride of place—in moving our priors on most of the important questions in development economics.
But the paper is not meant to be a critique of randomized evaluations, which have greatly enriched our empirical toolkit. It is instead a plea for not letting prevailing methodological differences overshadow the larger convergence. My purpose is to get macro-development economists and micro-development economists to see that they have much more in common than they realize.
Case in point: the greatest development success of our time, China. As I review and document in my paper, the experimentalist mind set was deeply ingrained in China’s approach to reform. Some of the experiments that proved extremely successful were: the household responsibility system, dual-track pricing, township-and-village enterprises, and special economic zones. Of course, the informal evaluations to which these experiments got subjected would not satisfy the standards of the MIT Poverty Action Lab. “Seeing whether something works” is hardly as rigorous as randomized evaluations. But it would be silly to claim that Chinese policy makers did not learn something from their experiments.
The China example is important because it illustrates, in a vastly significant real-world instance, how the experimental approach to policy reform need not remain limited in scope and can extend into the domain of national policies. China, of course, is a special case in many ways. The point is not that all countries can adopt the specific type of experimentation ... that China has used to such great effect. But the mindset exhibited in China’s reform process is general and transferable—and it differs greatly from the mindset behind the presumptive strategies outlined above. It is perfectly illustrative of the potential convergence between the ideas of micro-development economists and macro-development economists. One would hope that the response of micro experimentalists to China’s experimentalism is not to say “but this is worthless, none of the experiments were evaluated rigorously through randomization,” but to say instead: “great, here is how our ideas can make the world a better place not just one school or health district at a time.”
So my bottom line is that the practice of development economics is at the cusp of a significant opportunity. We have the prospect not only of a re-unification of the field, long divided between macro- and micro-development economists, but also of a progression from presumptive approaches with ready-made universal recipes to diagnostic, contextual approaches based on experimentation and policy innovation. If carried to fruition, this transformation would represent an important advance in how development policy is carried out.
But we need more work. Macro-development economists will have to recognize more explicitly the distinct advantages of the experimental approach and a greater number among them will have to adopt the policy mindset of the randomized evaluation enthusiasts. As the Chinese example illustrates, extending the experimental mindset to the domain of economy-wide reforms is not just possible, it has already been practiced with resounding success in the most important development experience of our generation. Micro-development economists, for their part, will have to recognize that one can learn from diverse types of evidence, and that while randomized evaluations are a tremendously useful addition to the empirical toolkit, the utility of the evidence they yield is restricted by the narrow and limited scope of their application.
In the end, macro-development economists have to be humbler about what they already know, and micro-development economists humbler about what they can learn.
Both types of development economists you mentioned still won't be able to do justice to economic development because of the fact that much of their works are based on the Western-based economic ideology. I suggest spiritual economics is one way to go. Sounds weird?
To do justice to economic development, we have to realize these things:
1. Resouces are finite, so it does not matter how best or how hard you try, economies cannot grow sustainably for much longer if the current economic ideology dominates the discussion.
2. Economic conditions are resulted from a whole array of factors, including cultural, political, geographical, social, so that the focus squarely on economic analysis misses many points as we attempt to advance economic development.
3. Data can be distorted from both fronts: the object and the researcher. So, it does not matter how elaborate the econometric analysis is, the truth will never be reached. If the "truth" could be reached, how then the WB and the IMF failed in many fronts to help poor countries develop?
Posted by: Anh Tran | May 21, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Dani Rodrik pleads “for not letting prevailing methodological differences overshadow the larger convergence.” And says, “development economics is at the cusp of a significant opportunity. We have the prospect not only of a re-unification of the field, long divided between macro- and micro-development economists, but also of a progression from presumptive approaches with ready-made universal recipes to diagnostic, contextual approaches based on experimentation and policy innovation. If carried to fruition, this transformation would represent an important advance in how development policy is carried out.”
And I have to ask what is so good about that and what is so bad with divergence. This is all about development and not about laying the foundations for a new development church that even while much freer spirit than the Washington Consensus, almost a hippy version of it, is still a church.
Dani Rodrik also urges “In the end, macro-development economists have to be humbler about what they already know, and micro-development economists humbler about what they can learn.” And I would say, humbler, in just a general way, would suffice.
By the way for the second comment in a row I subscribe completely to what Anh Tran says referring to the changing global realities. Just as an example I recently read a study by two prominent development economists who were scratching their heads in order to analyze why El Salvador had not grown as much as it should over the last decade, without even discovering the reality that most Salvadorians had just left their country to grow somewhere else, mainly in the US, to such an extent that what they produced gross in the US already exceeded by much El Salvador’s own local GDP.
Posted by: Per Kurowski | May 21, 2008 at 12:41 PM
"what is so bad with divergence"
The conversational manifestation of it can prompt non-economists in development to percieve economists as unable to ever agree on anything. If you need evidence of that, I have a long list of economist-jokes that have been trotted out at varoius meetings that I can share with you.
Posted by: inthemachine | May 21, 2008 at 01:27 PM
"The conversational manifestation of it can prompt non-economists in development to percieve economists as unable to ever agree on anything."
Yet it might be much worse if they agree!!!
I mean, in that case why would us economist be needed?
cheers
Posted by: Per Kurowski | May 21, 2008 at 03:50 PM
"The conversational manifestation of it can prompt non-economists in development to percieve economists as unable to ever agree on anything."
Yet it might be much worse if they agree!!!
I mean, in that case why would us economist be needed?
cheers
Posted by: Per Kurowski | May 21, 2008 at 03:51 PM
Dear Dani
Do you know anyone working on both micro and macro development? I would like to learn from someone doing both fronts. It must be a difficult task but a rewarding one as well, am I intending to do to much?
Posted by: rmx | May 21, 2008 at 07:44 PM
China has had very much success with experimentation. The great leap forward and the cultural revolution were really good examples of what not to do with people's lives.
Posted by: Mao | May 21, 2008 at 09:27 PM
Dear Prof. Rodrik,
I read your paper and I agree with you in principle but not in practice.
Yes, there are various research methodologies, and yes experimentation of various kinds is good.
I fundamentally disagree with your portrayal of Growth Diagnostics (GD), however.
First, it ignores history. Development economist have written whole treatises and careful case studies for a number of countries for decades. The idea that until GD came along economist where robots implementing blind laundry lists is a useful straw man, but not a fair description of reality. A little more humbleness is called for here. GD is a useful reminder of what good economic practice is about, perhaps stated more formally, but not a new paradigm.
Second, it is unfalsifiable. GD works when it works and it doesn't when the diagnostic is not performed right.
Third, it ignores practical reality. Essentially what you are arguing is that we need careful diagnosis on a case by case basis. Most well trained economists I know will fully agree. Yet the practical problem is scaling that up to institutions like the World Bank with some 5,000 economists, some brilliant, some terrible, most average. I call this "the we cannot all be Dani Rodrik problem" or DRP for short.
DRP is a problem of rules versus discretion. Can you trust 5,000 economists to exercise their discretion? My sense is that most IFIs don't. Indeed, there are already "best practices" circulating around for doing GD! Ultimately, to scale things up, this is inevitable. After all, it was Stieglitz, then Chief Economist of the WB, who famously quipped that IFIs have 3rd rate economists from 1st rate universities.
How to deal with the DRP? One could hope to recruit better personnel, but that is easier said than done: the best tend to go to academia, private sector, etc. Alternative, one may seek better training. Yet, even in medicine, where training is exhaustive, someone recently told me that 50% of all medical diagnoses are wrong. Forget the accuracy of the percentage - the point is the error rate is huge.
So if recruitment and training have limited impact, What do you do? You impose safeguards, controls, and guess what, rules and best practices.
To conclude, my sense is that your whole debate is one of rules versus discretion, and whereas we would all prefer discretion under the right people deciding, it is heavily conditional on who is in charge. If economists cannot be trained better, and if the best don't end up in policy, then we are going to need some rules, at a cost. But presumably that cost is less than the cost of giving discretions to semi-competent economists, or much worse, Mao or Pol Pot (as another commenter in this blog emphasized). Then again, the latter were not true "Growth Diagnosers" and experimentalists, or were they?
Posted by: Frank | May 22, 2008 at 12:05 PM
then, maybe it isn't rules-vs-discretion; but some basic rules-of-thumb and well-informed discretion. the quest for Aristotle's mean.
Posted by: jose carlos | May 27, 2008 at 07:03 PM
I've often wondered why development is not taught as business is taught -- with case study after case study. Surely entire nations are at least as diverse and complicated as medium-sized businesses.
Posted by: Punditus Maximus | May 31, 2008 at 05:42 PM
...obviously there are many thing that need to be about the development economics.
Posted by: egunjobi emmanuel...nigeria | July 29, 2008 at 11:14 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 02:12 AM
GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | April 22, 2010 at 01:39 AM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 06, 2010 at 01:05 AM
How to deal with the DRP? One could hope to recruit better personnel, but that is easier said than done: the best tend to go to academia, private sector, etc. Alternative, one may seek better training. Yet, even in medicine, where training is exhaustive, someone recently told me that 50% of all medical diagnoses are wrong. Forget the accuracy of the percentage - the point is the error rate is huge.
http://www.cheapshoeshop.com/Nike-Air-Max-Shoes/Nike-Air-Max-90.html Air Max 90
http://www.cheapshoeshop.com/Nike-Air-Max-Shoes/Nike-Air-Max--95.html Air Max 95
Posted by: vibram shoes | June 29, 2010 at 04:16 AM
need to be about the development economics.
Posted by: designer shoes | June 30, 2010 at 04:24 AM
I agree with you in principle but not in practice
Posted by: wholesale handbags | June 30, 2010 at 04:25 AM
I mean, in that case why would us economist be needed
Posted by: clothing store | June 30, 2010 at 04:26 AM
obviously there are many thing that need to be about the development economics.
Posted by: Moncler Jackets | July 01, 2010 at 04:41 AM
Thanks for enjoying this article.
Posted by: Gucci outlet | July 04, 2010 at 08:35 AM
This is awesome, please keep writing.
Good post!As i was passing by here and i read your post.
Posted by: Gucci outlet | July 05, 2010 at 08:20 AM
Good post about Re-uniting development economics. Keep on.
Posted by: dell adapter | July 21, 2010 at 12:31 AM
so long
Posted by: superflatiron | July 23, 2010 at 09:41 PM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 09:31 PM
Dani Rodrik also urges “In the end, macro-development economists have to be humbler about what they already know, and micro-development economists humbler about what they can learn.” And I would say, humbler, in just a general way, would suffice.
By the way for the second comment in a row I subscribe completely to what Anh Tran says referring to the changing global realities. Just as an example I recently read a study by two prominent development economists who were scratching their heads in order to analyze why El Salvador had not grown as much as it should over the last decade, without even discovering the reality that most Salvadorians had just left their country to grow somewhere else, mainly in the US, to such an extent that what they produced gross in the US already exceeded by much El Salvador’s own local GDP.
Posted by: asics shose | July 28, 2010 at 02:51 AM
On the right side of the dial, our attention is immediately drawn to the jumping hours that adds terrific come with to the timepiece. On the left side of the dial, we are head over feels enchanted by the exquisite open work inspired by the Doumetre a Chronographe as well as the Master Tradition line. Overall, the dial design and style is both contemprorary and aesthetically harmonious.montblanc watches replicas
Posted by: replica watches | August 01, 2010 at 10:16 PM
Dani Rodrik also urges “In the end, macro-development economists have to be humbler about what they already know, and micro-development economists humbler about what they can learn.” And I would say, humbler, in just a general way, would suffice.
Posted by: lv handbags | August 12, 2010 at 03:37 AM
something works, it is worth doing.
This convergence has remained largely hidden from view, because the analytical and empirical tools used by economists at the macro and micro end of things—growth economists versus social policy economists—tend to be quite
Posted by: all star shoes | August 13, 2010 at 08:45 PM
as you know, i was a new visitor of your blog, but This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content, refueling
Posted by: Moncler | August 15, 2010 at 09:53 AM
Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing.
Posted by: cheap jordans | August 23, 2010 at 09:52 PM
Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing.
Posted by: cheap jordans | August 23, 2010 at 09:55 PM
Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes for sale | August 23, 2010 at 10:26 PM
Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes for sale | August 23, 2010 at 10:34 PM
Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing.
Posted by: air jordans for sale | August 23, 2010 at 10:40 PM
I’ve seen progression in every post. Your newer posts are simply wonderful compared to your posts in the past. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 03:08 AM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 08:51 PM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 09:05 PM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 09:12 PM
By the way for the second comment in a row I subscribe completely to what Anh Tran says referring to the changing global realities. Just as an example
Posted by: Moncler | August 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM
China has had very much success with experimentation. The great leap forward and the cultural revolution were really good examples of what not to do with people's lives
Posted by: abercrombie | August 27, 2010 at 07:12 PM
[url=http://www.amandadollar.com/]Dollar Stores[/url] Van Houten had been upset that she was not picked to come along when Susan Atkins,
Posted by: yiwu wholesale | September 09, 2010 at 07:06 AM
The range of lubricants is manufactured, all to the highest international standards, under the trade mark of “LUBECHEM”.
Posted by: industrial lubricants | September 21, 2010 at 05:18 AM
then, maybe it isn't rules-vs-discretion; but some basic rules-of-thumb and well-informed discretion. the quest for Aristotle's mean.
Posted by: Invitation Letter for VISA to Yiwu | September 26, 2010 at 01:23 AM
thanks you..
Posted by: mbt shoes | October 05, 2010 at 05:57 AM
Dani Rodrik also urges “In the end, macro-development economists have to be humbler about what they already know, and micro-development economists humbler about what they can learn.” And I would say, humbler, in just a general way, would suffice.
Posted by: gucci outlet | November 01, 2010 at 09:26 PM
We understand all too well that scholars convey extensively hefty learned burdens chasing a stage which pledges a brighter future career. Affordable Writing is joyous to offer expert term paper assist to those who seem bogged down with critical written check stress.
Essay Writing
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM
.. Apparently, a lot about development economics.
Logo Design
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 30, 2010 at 07:56 AM
raf
Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 20, 2011 at 04:13 AM
columbus injury lawyer
I always enjoy reading your posts and I look forward to your next one.
Posted by: Ron Looker | February 17, 2011 at 10:47 PM
Focuses on the link between economics and ecology and the immense potential of that connection to influence the process of change within communities...
Cheap Logo Design
Posted by: Account Deleted | March 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM
I seem to remember a little document called Constitution, it talks about pursuit of happiness and Human Rights for Americans and democracy in USA. orjin krem I don't remember it postulated pursuit of Globaloonie, Free Trade, Supernation Federation run by Jeffry Sachses of this world.
Posted by: oyunlar | March 22, 2011 at 12:02 PM
Yesterday, my friend bought a cheap designer handbags which is so beautiful... fds
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 08, 2011 at 09:14 PM
It's a good answer for their activity, so they already know that they may not do it again in public. And it can teach other auto insurance quotes people.
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM
http://www.rolexparty.com/
etfgfd
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 20, 2011 at 04:26 AM
this is horrific. and here in america we have miss california openly gay bashing with the support of bigots and homophobes cheering her on.logo design
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 09, 2011 at 02:12 AM
I think the girls parading around is a separate issue. But you've got to admit that comparing Miss California and her opinion on marriage to the murderers of gays in Iraq is a little farfetched.hughes
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 09, 2011 at 02:25 AM
You have very good knowledge. I need your help. I am leaning economics. This subject is new to me. Do you know anyone working on both micro and macro development? I want to learn. Any help would be appreciated. Dissertation Help
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 16, 2011 at 03:22 PM
raf
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 25, 2011 at 01:43 PM
This is very true.I lost my weight just made changes in food ,taking all vegetarian and of low carb This helped me a lot and I suggest everyone
Hotels In Porto
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 05, 2011 at 03:53 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks for this ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 07, 2011 at 10:05 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 01:45 PM
Please tell me that youre going to keep this up! Its so terrific and so crucial. I cant wait to read much more from you. magnetic motor
Posted by: Fidelcast.blogspot.com | October 02, 2011 at 04:36 AM
The value of information available here is measure with value of outsources provided here which able us to comment here.Help With Essay
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 10, 2011 at 12:15 AM
Thanks to a brilliant effort in publishing your article. One can be more informative as this. There are many things I can know only after reading your wonderful article.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 10, 2011 at 02:29 PM
The value of the blog is the content and resources of the blog which both are falls in this blog.
custom logo design
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 07:30 AM
Natural supplements
I really enjoy simply reading all of your weblogs. Simply wanted to inform
you that you have people like me who appreciate your work. Definitely a great
post. Hats off to you! The information that you have provided is very helpful.
http://www.healthygreen.co/
Posted by: Account Deleted | November 30, 2011 at 07:14 AM
Very informative and information presented very well,
Natural Colon Cleanser
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 23, 2011 at 05:07 AM
tubal ligation reversal
I can not stop reading this. And 'so fresh, so full of information,
I do not know. I'm glad that people actually write the smart way to
show the different sides of him.
tubal ligation reversal
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 23, 2012 at 03:05 AM
Very helpful post like always, thank you.
Cesped Artificial Precios
Posted by: Account Deleted | March 06, 2012 at 09:16 PM
Saying thank you is a virtue. It is plausible learning to utter such. Some don't even dare to say such.Formula 21 Formen Gece Gözlüğü panax My Slimmer
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 01, 2012 at 12:27 PM
I try and learn something new everyday. Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge manzaralar zayıflama oyunlar yemek tarifleri
Posted by: orjin krem | May 02, 2012 at 10:44 AM
This is a wonderful site where we are getting more information. I really hope more people read this and get what you’re saying, because let me tell you, it is important stuff. I never would’ve thought about it this way unless it runs into your blog. And I have been talking with my friend about, he though it is really interesting as well. Keep up with your good work; I would come back to you. Than you for your sharing!dich vu seo gia reforexrao vatviec lam thuc tapfree backlinks3d showroomseo vietnam
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 03, 2012 at 03:28 AM
powerpoint file corrupted
Thanks for the interesting article!
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 28, 2012 at 02:27 AM
Hi dani
I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here, Thank u.
Creating History Together With ArenaBetting Piala Eropa 2012
Iklan Internet Murah Efektif Berkualitas Indonesia
Motor Matic Injeksi Irit Harga Murah – Yamaha Mio J
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 07, 2012 at 10:00 AM
Whether you need any help in giving a finishing touch to your papers or writing the difficult chapters or need the analysis of those critical assignments, you can take help from us anywhere anytime.
Paper writing
Professional Paper Writing
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 16, 2012 at 02:35 PM
You've done a lot of hard work in presenting the information with us. You give a warm material that would be useful. Nice to read your writing.
http://seotoolinfo.blogdetik.com/files/2012/07/77b70216697c5355b397b021087dfa47_bavetline-agen-judi-bola-terpercaya.jpg
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 23, 2012 at 01:32 PM
Bank Mandiri Bank Terbaik di Indonesia
Bank Mandiri Bank Terbaik di Indonesia
Promo Bonus 100% Sbobet, Ibcbet dan Casino Online Dalam Rangka HUT BAVETLINE Yang Kedua
Masterbet88 Grand Opening Promo Bonus 50% Sportsbook dan Casino Online
Posted by: Rastia Rigie | January 15, 2013 at 12:04 AM
Development is the ultimate goal.China did well in development economics those years.
Ultrabook Parts|AU AC Adapters|Global AC Adapter|Ersatz Laptop Akkus
Posted by: Kinsell Emma | February 26, 2013 at 09:44 PM
http://www.mahapoker.com/ Dewa Poker http://www.mahapoker.com/ Permainan Poker http://www.mahapoker.com/support/carabermain.html Cara Bermain Poker http://www.mahapoker.com/ Poker Online http://www.mahapoker.com/ Game Poker http://www.mahapoker.com/ Poker Online Indonesia http://www.mahapoker.com/ Agen Poker http://www.mahapoker.com/ Poker Uang Asli http://www.mahapoker.com/ Agen Poker Online http://ligabebek.com Agen Bola - http://ligabebek.com Agen Bola Terpercaya - http://ligabebek.com Agen Sbobet - http://ligabebek.com Casino sbobet - http://ligabebek.com Sbobet - http://ligabebek.com Bola Tangkas http://tangkaspro.com/ Bola Tangkas http://tangkaspro.com/ Bola Tangkas Terpercaya http://tangkaspro.com/ Bola Tangkas Online http://tangkaspro.com/ Agen Bola Tangkas http://tangkaspro.com/ Bola Tangkas Online Indonesia http://tangkaspro.com/ Tangkas Online http://the-infinitygroup.com/ Poker Dewa http://the-infinitygroup.com/ Texas Holdem Poker http://the-infinitygroup.com/ Games Poker http://the-infinitygroup.com/ Zinga Poker http://the-infinitygroup.com/ Poker Texas Boyaa http://the-infinitygroup.com/ Dewa Poker Online http://the-infinitygroup.com/ Zyngapoker http://the-infinitygroup.com/ Holdem Poker http://the-infinitygroup.com/ poker online terpercaya http://walibola.com Agen Bola Terpercaya http://walibola.com Agen Bola Online http://walibola.com Situs Agen Bola Terpercaya http://walibola.com Agen Bola Tangkas http://walibola.com Agen Bola Sbobet http://walibola.com Sbobet http://walibola.com Ibcbet
Posted by: AgenBolaKaki | June 23, 2014 at 11:49 AM
It is obvious that development is requirement for economic, I believe it is not easy to analysis things. I don’t have to put too much effort thanks to OctaFX broker, as they got amazing expert service that provides daily market news and analysis service, it is very easy to follow and highly beneficial given the accuracy so far for me has been above 80%, it is really cool and makes me feel really happy with things and takes away the stress.
Posted by: DjNasir | January 01, 2016 at 09:42 PM