Bob Kuttner spends some time in Denmark and has wise things to say about the welfare state in Denmark and advanced countries in general:
Reading Adam Smith in Copenhagen -- the center of the small, open, and highly successful Danish economy -- is a kind of out-of-body experience. On the one hand, the Danes are passionate free traders. They score well in the ratings constructed by pro-market organizations. The World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Index ranks Denmark third, just behind the United States and Switzerland. Denmark's financial markets are clean and transparent, its barriers to imports minimal, its labor markets the most flexible in Europe, its multinational corporations dynamic and largely unmolested by industrial policies, and its unemployment rate of 2.8 percent the second lowest in the OECD (the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).
On the other hand, Denmark spends about 50 percent of its GDP on public outlays and has the world's second-highest tax rate, after Sweden; strong trade unions; and one of the world's most equal income distributions. For the half of GDP that they pay in taxes, the Danes get not just universal health insurance but also generous child-care and family-leave arrangements, unemployment compensation that typically covers around 95 percent of lost wages, free higher education, secure pensions in old age, and the world's most creative system of worker retraining.
Does Denmark have some secret formula that combines the best of Adam Smith with the best of the welfare state? Is there something culturally unique about the open-minded Danes? Can a model like the Danish one survive as a social democratic island in a turbulent sea of globalization, where unregulated markets tend to swamp mixed economic systems? What does Denmark have to teach the rest of the industrial world?
These questions brought me to Copenhagen for a series of interviews in 2007 for a book I am writing on globalization and the welfare state. The answers are complex and often counterintuitive. With appropriate caveats, Danish ideas can indeed be instructive for other nations grappling with the enduring dilemma of how to reconcile market dynamism with social and personal security. Yet Denmark's social compact is the result of a century of political conflict and accommodation that produced a consensual style of problem solving that is uniquely Danish. It cannot be understood merely as a technical policy fix to be swallowed whole in a different cultural or political context. Those who would learn from Denmark must first appreciate that social models have to grow in their own political soil.
At the heart of the Danish model, Kuttner says, is the idea known as flexicurity. What this means, in part, is that in Denmark there are simply no restrictions against laying off workers other than the requirement of advance notice. But:
What makes the flexicurity model both attractive to workers and dynamic for society are five key features: full employment; strong unions recognized as social partners; fairly equal wages among different sectors, so that a shift from manufacturing to service-sector work does not typically entail a pay cut; a comprehensive income floor; and a set of labor-market programs that spend an astonishing 4.5 percent of Danish GDP on initiatives such as transitional unemployment assistance, wage subsidies, and highly customized retraining.
In the U.S. by contrast, "spending on all forms of government labor-market subsidies -- of which meager and strictly time-limited unemployment compensation makes up the most part -- is about 0.3 percent of GDP."
The focus on economic security also enables a remarkable degree of consensus and enthusiasm on free trade. Denmark is probably one of the few places in the world where you will find, as Kuttner did, trade unionists arguing that industry should engage in more outsourcing!
If you want to learn from and adopt the Danish model, Kuttner says, you cannot do it on the cheap. The trade adjustment or wage insurance remedies that are circulated in the U.S. context do not include
the other key elements that make flexicurity both a political and a policy success. Most seek to buffer the dislocations of trade on the cheap. But the Danish model cannot be understood as a strategy merely of "compensating losers" or even of reinforcing political consent for free trade. It is part of a far broader national commitment to maintaining a highly egalitarian society in which there are no bad jobs and to the use of ongoing labor-market subsidies to create a highly skilled and dynamic work force as the essence of global competitiveness. The other northern European nations have their own successful variants of active labor-market policy, but most of the proposals outside Scandinavia that invoke the Danish model would appropriate the flexibility without the security. None is politically serious about the necessary scale of public outlay or social collaboration.
Kuttner's bottom line is that the Danish model is too specific to Denmark to be exported wholesale. But, as he hastens to add, the ideas in it are simply too good to ignore.
this can't seriously be news in economists' country? Political scientists and sociologists have been drooling over Denmark for the last decade and flexicurity is a buzz-word in both the ILO and the OECD. While Denmark is indeed impressive, some major caveats are in order:
1. Denmark really is quite a small country. As Uwe Becker
has pointed out, if you pick successful regions of the same size in, e.g. Germany, they do about as well as Denmark.
2. The Danish industrial structure is quite distinct (this an argument by David Soskice, one of the leading economists/political scientists in the debate), with hardly any large firms and mainly medium-size employers.
3. The politics of welfare state reform (in the 1990s) in Denmark may be more ugly than meets the eye immediately. Hyper-nationalism and xenophobia, combined with perhaps Europes strictest anti-immigrant strategies, were part of the strategy to legitimize the reform packet.
So with all due respect for Denmark, it maybe a good idea to curb some enthusiasm.
Posted by: Sebastian | May 07, 2008 at 08:45 AM
Just to accentuate the positive - which may be difficult to translate to other countries:
Danish trade unions are and have always been pragmatic and relatively cooperative as a rule in their relations with employers. This goes back to 1899 when the September Agreement was reached.
Can you get Wal-Mart to accept trade unions - and get US trade unions to accept that labour market policies are about creating rather than keeping existing jobs? (I'm painting a slightly rosy picture here)
Even if a lot of things can be said about Danish immigration policy, then I'm not really sure that the link between labour-market reforms and anti-immigration policies is that simple. The Swedish trade unions were anti-immigration following the eastern enlargement of the EU.
Oh, well. Maybe I'll return with more comments later. Much can be said about this.
Posted by: Jacob Christensen | May 07, 2008 at 09:05 AM
Denmark is also home to one of the most interesting approaches to regulation, the "action plan" framework. This is a collaborative model in which social actors (unions, civil society groups, even government agencies) agree to work for cooperative solutions with business, while business cedes a significant measure of autonomy. Imagine a joint venture structure, but with for-profit and social partners trying to solve health, environmental and other problems. I don't know of a comprehensive study of this system in English; maybe Kuttner can take this on in his spare time....
Posted by: Peter | May 07, 2008 at 09:20 AM
Sweden's policies are very similar, with less xenophobia, but also less flexibility. However, despite long moaning and negative publicity by foreigners, especially in the US, Sweden is doing pretty well again these days. Free trade with a lot of adjustment assistance and income equality does well.
Posted by: Barkley Rosser | May 07, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Another great example of the benefits of free trade & free markets - they can even overcome high tax rates and large government spending.
Imagine how well Denmark would do if it downsized its government?
Posted by: Justin Rietz | May 07, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Another great example of the benefits of free trade & free markets - they can even overcome high tax rates and large government spending.
Imagine how well Denmark would do if it downsized its government?
Posted by: Justin Rietz | May 07, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Sebastian: "Hyper-nationalism and xenophobia, combined with perhaps Europes strictest anti-immigrant strategies"
Do you have any specifics on these claims or, better yet, link(s)?
Also, how anti-immigrant can Denmark be when the EU requires that a citizen of any EU country that's been in the union more than a few years be allowed to live and work in any EU country?
Posted by: alex | May 07, 2008 at 07:52 PM
Justin,
Not obvious it would do any better and might well do worse. That is the point here: Denmark has among the world's very best stats on various fronts, with several of its closest rivals being other Nordic states with pretty similar systems. Part of what makes it work is exactly all those social safety nets provided by that large govenment. Take those away, and a lot of the support for the vigorous free trade is going to disappear.
alex,
I don't have a link, but the anti-immigrant sentiment is directed at non-EU citizens, many of them refugees from troubled Middle Eastern countries, many of them Muslims.
Posted by: Barkley Rosser | May 07, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Barkley -
"Part of what makes it work is exactly all those social safety nets provided by that large govenment"
Your statement is exactly my point - you can make whatever blanket statements you want about the benefits of free trade / free markets in regards to Denmark's economy, and the prima facie case will support it. What is needed is analysis.
"Take those away, and a lot of the support for the vigorous free trade is going to disappear."
I more or less agree. This doesn't change the benefits (or downfalls) of free trade.
Posted by: Justin Rietz | May 08, 2008 at 12:30 AM
For an indication of the degree of xenophobia in Denmark, one need only consider the relative success of the anti-immigrant Danish People's Party in the 2007 parliamentary election: it received 13.9% of the popular vote.
Anyone interested in racism in Europe should check out some of the publications of the European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), which can be found at http://www.eumc.at/fra/index.php?fuseaction=content.dsp_cat_content&catid=1.
Posted by: Winston | May 08, 2008 at 12:36 AM
"most of the proposals outside Scandinavia that invoke the Danish model would appropriate the flexibility without the security."
Too true - flexicurity and "le modele danois" have been all the rage on the French right for a couple of years, but how can anyone trust that a neo-liberal government that says it wants to go in that direction will in fact deliver on the security part?
Path dependency, lock-in effect, collective action problem, prisoners' dilemmas, call it what you will, the political economy problems for any transition from the more tightly regulated continental European labour markets are formiddable.
Plus, I find this all very persuasive, but why doesn't any great link between employment protection legislation and unemployment show up in empirical studies (according to a couple of papers I've read anyhow).
Posted by: DC | May 08, 2008 at 10:45 AM
"...fairly equal wages among different sectors, so that a shift from manufacturing to service-sector work does not typically entail a pay cut..."
This sort of income compression (if that is what Kuttner is talking about) is often condemned as reducing productivity. Pity there's no discussion of productivity in Kuttner's piece. I would bet that he found it no worse than Denmark's trading partners.
Posted by: gordon | May 09, 2008 at 01:15 AM
14% of the popular vote to an anti-immigrant political party constitutes racism? It's less than half of the 40% of white Democrats who don't want to vote for a man of mixed race. Glass houses, fellas.
Posted by: Powkat | May 09, 2008 at 10:59 AM
14% of the popular vote to an anti-immigrant political party constitutes racism? It's less than half of the 40% of white Democrats who don't want to vote for a man of mixed race. Glass houses, fellas.
Posted by: Powkat | May 09, 2008 at 11:00 AM
I'm glad to see exploration of other economic models around the world. The more learning the better.
However one thing that comes to mind looking at Denmark, the obvious one to me as an American, is the idea of some kind of cooperative vision.
American's just don't have that. We're far, far too occupied in turf wars, petty politics, flag pins, racial issues, etc. to unify and have a vision of a future we'd like to share.
Every American politician has some "problem" they'll take on, but few talk realistically about the society we want to have and how to get it. Probably as it's going to take work and not everyone will get everything - and people don't want to say that.
Posted by: DragonScholar | May 09, 2008 at 11:56 AM
I am an American from Los Angeles who lived in Denmark for 5 years. I found it to be the most intolerant and xenophobic of places. The Danish tribalism and overall smugness is astounding overall.
The Danes may be evolved in some ways but they have very far to go when it goes to being openminded and general human acceptance.
Posted by: Jane Rocheford | May 09, 2008 at 12:40 PM
May 07, 2008
If the Danes can do it, why can't others?
Bob Kuttner spends some time in Denmark and has wise things to say about the welfare state in Denmark and advanced countries in general:
Reading Adam Smith in Copenhagen -- the center of the small, open, and highly successful Danish economy -- is a kind of out-of-body experience. On the one hand, the Danes are passionate free traders. They score well in the ratings constructed by pro-market organizations. The World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Index ranks Denmark third, just behind the United States and Switzerland. Denmark's financial markets are clean and transparent, its barriers to imports minimal, its labor markets the most flexible in Europe, its multinational corporations dynamic and largely unmolested by industrial policies, and its unemployment rate of 2.8 percent the second lowest in the OECD (the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).
On the other hand, Denmark spends about 50 percent of its GDP on public outlays and has the world's second-highest tax rate, after Sweden; strong trade unions; and one of the world's most equal income distributions. For the half of GDP that they pay in taxes, the Danes get not just universal health insurance but also generous child-care and family-leave arrangements, unemployment compensation that typically covers around 95 percent of lost wages, free higher education, secure pensions in old age, and the world's most creative system of worker retraining.
Does Denmark have some secret formula that combines the best of Adam Smith with the best of the welfare state? Is there something culturally unique about the open-minded Danes? Can a model like the Danish one survive as a social democratic island in a turbulent sea of globalization, where unregulated markets tend to swamp mixed economic systems? What does Denmark have to teach the rest of the industrial world?
These questions brought me to Copenhagen for a series of interviews in 2007 for a book I am writing on globalization and the welfare state. The answers are complex and often counterintuitive. With appropriate caveats, Danish ideas can indeed be instructive for other nations grappling with the enduring dilemma of how to reconcile market dynamism with social and personal security. Yet Denmark's social compact is the result of a century of political conflict and accommodation that produced a consensual style of problem solving that is uniquely Danish. It cannot be understood merely as a technical policy fix to be swallowed whole in a different cultural or political context. Those who would learn from Denmark must first appreciate that social models have to grow in their own political soil.
At the heart of the Danish model, Kuttner says, is the idea known as flexicurity. What this means, in part, is that in Denmark there are simply no restrictions against laying off workers other than the requirement of advance notice. But:
What makes the flexicurity model both attractive to workers and dynamic for society are five key features: full employment; strong unions recognized as social partners; fairly equal wages among different sectors, so that a shift from manufacturing to service-sector work does not typically entail a pay cut; a comprehensive income floor; and a set of labor-market programs that spend an astonishing 4.5 percent of Danish GDP on initiatives such as transitional unemployment assistance, wage subsidies, and highly customized retraining.
In the U.S. by contrast, "spending on all forms of government labor-market subsidies -- of which meager and strictly time-limited unemployment compensation makes up the most part -- is about 0.3 percent of GDP."
The focus on economic security also enables a remarkable degree of consensus and enthusiasm on free trade. Denmark is probably one of the few places in the world where you will find, as Kuttner did, trade unionists arguing that industry should engage in more outsourcing!
If you want to learn from and adopt the Danish model, Kuttner says, you cannot do it on the cheap. The trade adjustment or wage insurance remedies that are circulated in the U.S. context do not include
the other key elements that make flexicurity both a political and a policy success. Most seek to buffer the dislocations of trade on the cheap. But the Danish model cannot be understood as a strategy merely of "compensating losers" or even of reinforcing political consent for free trade. It is part of a far broader national commitment to maintaining a highly egalitarian society in which there are no bad jobs and to the use of ongoing labor-market subsidies to create a highly skilled and dynamic work force as the essence of global competitiveness. The other northern European nations have their own successful variants of active labor-market policy, but most of the proposals outside Scandinavia that invoke the Danish model would appropriate the flexibility without the security. None is politically serious about the necessary scale of public outlay or social collaboration.
Kuttner's bottom line is that the Danish model is too specific to Denmark to be exported wholesale. But, as he hastens to add, the ideas in it are
Posted by: Jane Rocheford | May 09, 2008 at 12:41 PM
GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | April 22, 2010 at 01:49 AM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 06, 2010 at 01:09 AM
I'm surprised your so good thoughts. I'd like to become your good friend. Before I believe a good pair of shoes as my faithful friend, and so i always find the the most suitable and favorite shoes, if you agree with my view, you can look at my site
Posted by: nike air jordan | June 02, 2010 at 10:39 PM
thnk you for sharing
Posted by: travesti | June 24, 2010 at 08:33 AM
Looking for good gift for your pretty lover,ghd hair straightener will get her Looking amazing and shining.
http://www.ghdstraighteners-au.com/
Posted by: ghdstraighteners-au | July 06, 2010 at 02:18 AM
I'm surprised your so good thoughts. I'd like to become your good friend.
Posted by: Laptop Computer Batteries | August 11, 2010 at 10:59 PM
Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website. However, I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.
Posted by: cheap jordans | August 23, 2010 at 08:39 PM
I’ve seen progression in every post. Your newer posts are simply wonderful compared to your posts in the past. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 03:09 AM
Kuttner's bottom line is that the Danish model is too specific to Denmark to be exported wholesale. VRS!
Posted by: VRS | September 02, 2010 at 03:33 AM
I read so many different articles.butI like your articles,and hope you will write more,and better.i will assit to reading them,thanks.
Posted by: ugg caspia | September 08, 2010 at 03:38 AM
What this means, in part, is that in Denmark there are simply no restrictions against laying off workers other than the requirement of advance notice.
Posted by: bayan escort | October 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM
动感超人是小新最喜爱的卡通形象,时尚、动感、叛逆和自由,是小新最好的朋友。
by 搜索引擎营销
Posted by: 搜索引擎营销 | October 21, 2010 at 04:23 AM
Many people think and agree with the material presented.
Posted by: Puma Footwear | October 22, 2010 at 04:06 AM
Many people think and agree with the material presented.
Posted by: Puma Footwear | October 22, 2010 at 04:06 AM
This is good article. A friend without faults will never be found.
Posted by: Nike Air Max | November 10, 2010 at 01:11 AM
This is good article. A friend without faults will never be found.
Posted by: Nike Air Max | November 10, 2010 at 01:19 AM
I found your website perfect for my needs. It contains wonderful and helpful posts. I have read most of them and got a lot from them. To me, you are doing
the great work. Carry on this. work at home In the end, I would like to thank you for making such a nice website.
Posted by: burberry scarf | November 12, 2010 at 09:46 AM
That is a great list! I'd have to agree with you there.
Posted by: travesti | November 29, 2010 at 07:54 AM
I am really you and sharing. I like your website...
Posted by: travesti | December 03, 2010 at 05:57 AM
I anticipate art and IT (and new media) technology coming together in a real and meaningful way.
Posted by: wholesale kids' shoes | December 07, 2010 at 03:44 AM
Thank you to friends in the mist of this website and subject to comments
Posted by: escort bayan | December 07, 2010 at 10:01 AM
teşekkür ederim http://www.travestiilan.com
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 30, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Normally the topic of term papers is not that difficult but the tricks and tips to do it are quite difficult. At Affordable Writing we have those trips and tricks which can give you a high quality term paper on a very affordable price with strictly followed deadlines.
Term Paper Writing
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 03, 2011 at 12:07 PM
raf
Thanks for article.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 20, 2011 at 04:56 AM
columbus injury lawyer
I always enjoy reading your posts and I look forward to your next one.
Posted by: Ohioguide | February 18, 2011 at 11:34 PM
On the other hand, Denmark spends about 50 percent of its GDP on public outlays and has the world's second-highest tax rate, after Sweden Wholesale Beads
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 15, 2011 at 12:41 AM
http://www.wayfarer-ray-ban.com/ray-ban-aviator-c-30.html
DSFGASDF
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 21, 2011 at 08:43 PM
Kuttner's bottom line is that the Danish model is too specific to Denmark to be exported wholesale. But, as he hastens to add, the ideas in it are simply too good to ignore
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 25, 2011 at 08:37 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 01:52 PM
This is good site to spent time on .I just stumbled upon your informative blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your very well written blog posts. I will be your frequent visitor, that's for sure.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 04:49 PM
recover a powerpoint file
Good Post.It's really helpful & interesting
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 23, 2012 at 04:02 AM
Normally the topic of term papers is not that difficult but the tricks and tips to do it are quite difficult.
Essay Paper Writing
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 30, 2012 at 02:15 PM