Avinash Persaud makes some excellent points and has some very useful suggestions. A key point that I have not seen made elsewhere: since the whole point of financial regulation is to counteract market failures in financial markets, it makes no sense to base regulation on the prices that those same markets generate (as is done when we use mark-to-market accounting or rely on market prices of risk in risk models).
"The third pillar is requiring banks to pay an insurance premium to tax payers against the risk that the tax payer will be required to bail them out. If such a market could be created, it would not only incentivise good banking and push the focus of regulation away from process to outcomes, but it would provide an incentive for banks to be less systemic."
I loved this one, but it is a bit unclear to me how you could set up a market for this, or otherwise determine fair prices.
Any ideas?
Posted by: Great Zamfir | May 01, 2008 at 02:58 PM
How to (not) regulate the labor market (in Brazil): http://portalexame.abril.com.br/static/aberto/newsletter/news_30042008.html
Posted by: claudio | May 01, 2008 at 05:24 PM
To Great Zamfir. It is actually quite straithforward. Do not use the market bit size. Just follow the tradition of not putting all your eggs in the same basket and therefore create a progressive tax on the size of the banks. The larger the bank, the more it will hurt if it fails, so the more it should pay in insurance premiums.
Posted by: Per Kurowski | May 01, 2008 at 07:26 PM
Avinash Persaud also mentions that “the secondary objective, which is to avoid the discouragement of good banking” and in this he is getting much closer to what I have held for over a decade now, being what is the use of a bank regulatory system which only objective is to avoid a bank crisis since avoiding bank crisis per se cannot be the prime objective for our banks?
The following brief comment might better summarize what I mean.
Does prudence in banking really have to mean purposelessness?
What is more prudent for the bank regulators, to work exclusively at avoiding the default of banks and the occurrence of a bank crisis, or to ascertain that the banking system serves a purpose for the society?
These days when it has been demonstrated that the bank regulators are failing in their self imposed limited scope of functions; and indeed through the creation of the current structure of minimum capital requirements for the banks and the appointment of the credit rating agencies as risk commissars have themselves contributed to create new systemic risks, is it not time for us to take a big step back and, before digging us deeper in our regulatory hole, ask ourselves what is the purpose of our banks?
Aren’t you as fed up as me having a purposeless banking sector? If we absolutely have to live with risk avoidance based regulatory system, can’t we at least start measuring units of default risk in terms of decent jobs created, youngsters educated or environmental threats avoided?
Risk is the oxygen of development and so please let us not kill or even define risk taking!
Posted by: Per Kurowski | May 01, 2008 at 07:44 PM
But when Avinash Persaud says “there are few crises I have known from the inside that would not have happened if only there was more disclosure. People knew that sub-prime was a poor risk – it is called sub-prime, after all” there I do not agree.
First of all on a general point he seems to ignore that “to err is human” and on a more technical point he is factually wrong as you could indeed structure very prime securities around subprime mortgages but what happened in this case is that the official risk commissars the credit rating agencies, being human, erred, big, not noticing that the new batch of subprime mortgages being sent up had nothing to do with the older batches.
Posted by: Per Kurowski | May 01, 2008 at 08:24 PM
And when Avinash Persaud says “Almost every economic model will tell you that if all the players have the same tastes (reduce capital adequacy requirements) and have the same information (public ratings, approved risk-models using market prices) that the system will sooner or later send the herd off the cliff edge (Persaud 2000). And no degree of greater sophistication in the modelling of the price of risk will get around this fact”, the number one question that springs to ones mind is about “the inappropriateness of the financial regulators”. Who is going to tackle that one?
Posted by: Per Kurowski | May 02, 2008 at 08:03 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 02:41 AM
GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | April 22, 2010 at 01:59 AM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 06, 2010 at 01:11 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
Posted by: lachou | July 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM
I don’t think you can do that, yet.
Posted by: lv bags | August 12, 2010 at 07:33 AM
I’ve seen progression in every post. Your newer posts are simply wonderful compared to your posts in the past. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 03:14 AM
Im not going to say what everyone else has already said, but I do want to comment on your knowledge of the topic. You're truly well-informed.
Posted by: cheap and high quality handbags | October 15, 2010 at 08:23 AM
raf
Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 20, 2011 at 05:05 AM
columbus injury lawyer
I always enjoy reading your posts and I look forward to your next one.
Posted by: Ohioguide | February 18, 2011 at 11:36 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 01, 2011 at 03:42 AM
Raf
raf
Good Job ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 08, 2011 at 04:23 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 01:54 PM