I can't seem to get off this topic. This time my excuse is Maggie McMillan of Tufts, who rebukes me for having missed an opportunity to point out an important contradiction in the empirical literature surrounding the question of what a rise in food prices does to the world's poor.
Maggie, who has written insightfully herself on this question (did I mention that she was my student at Columbia?), was surprised that I referred in an earlier post to a World Bank study by Ivanic and Martin which argued that the poor would be hurt from a rise in world prices in a clear majority of developing nations that these authors looked at. What about this other World Bank paper (this one by Tom Hertel and company), she asks, which suggests the opposite?
Indeed, the second paper, which focuses on the effects of removal of rich country protection and subsidies in agriculture, finds that poverty rates would fall in virtually all of the developing countries included in the sample, and do so, as the Hertel et al. put it, as "a simple consequence of the higher world prices for farm products."
So an increase in world food prices is bad for global poverty, unless it is the result of the Doha Round, in which case it is good....?
Upon closer look, perhaps what is going on is simple sample selection. The two studies have only three countries in common: Peru, Vietnam, and Zambia. Now, interestingly the first two countries were the only two exceptions in the Ivanic and Martin study (the only to countries where the poor benefited from high food prices). And Zambia is one of the few where the results ran counter to the general finding in the Hertel et al. paper (in Zambia poverty rises as a result of an increase in food prices). So the country-level findings, in any case, seem not to be inconsistent.
But the discrepancy is worrying no matter what its source. Ivanic and Martin have extrapolated from their results to suggest the current rise in food prices will increase the global poverty headcount by more than 100 million (equivalent to a loss of almost seven years of poverty reduction). These estimates have been cited by World Bank president Zoellick and many others to shape the global policy agenda. But can we really trust them?
Tom Hertel and Will Martin are frequent co-authors, and I hope they will reconcile their findings for the rest of us.
Hertel and Martin respond:
Dear Dani:
Thanks for the opportunity to clarify the perceived contradictions between our studies of agricultural trade and poverty. To answer, we first review the different questions posed in the two studies, then reiterate the main findings and identify apparent contradictions, briefly contrast the methodologies employed, then take a very fruitful closer look at the results. We conclude that the two studies are quite consistent in their findings.
Purposes of the Studies and Main Findings:
The goal of the Hertel-Keeney- Ivanic-Winters paper (henceforth HKIW), published in Economic Policy, was to assess the impact of rich countries reforming all of their agricultural policies on poor households in developing countries and on farm households in rich countries. The paper concluded that such reforms would tend to hurt wealthy farmers in the rich countries – particularly the US, where detailed household data were available, while they would generally be poverty-reducing amongst farm households in poor countries. The impact on national poverty of rich country agricultural reforms was mixed, with the balance depending on the share of national poverty in agriculture-specialized households, as well as the impact of such reforms on unskilled wages and the landless poor. In the sample of 15 countries, the national poverty headcount fell in 9 cases.
The Ivanic-Martin (I-M) study asks a different question, namely: What is the impact of higher prices for a subset of agricultural products—staple foods— in a sample of nine low-income countries? They conclude that, with a few exceptions, increases in prices of staple foods raise poverty in poor countries. In light of the fact that rich country agricultural reforms affect developing countries mainly through changes in world prices, this finding generates an apparent contradiction.
Methodology:
Of course there are differences in methodology. However, in this case, we have the good fortune of having a common co-author, Maros Ivanic, who handled a key part of both studies, namely the household survey analysis. For this reason, a comparison is easier than it might otherwise be. The Ivanic-Martin study is much richer in its use of the household survey – using the entire survey, not just the households in the neighborhood of the poverty line, and detailed household data on production, consumption and net sales of staple foods. HKIW, on the other hand, have a more elaborate treatment of the national economies – including tariff revenue replacement and all factor markets. Despite these differences, however, we do not believe that differences in methodology are driving differences in the qualitative findings.
A Closer Look at the Results:
Rich country agricultural reforms under the WTO comprise three main components: export subsidy elimination, reductions in domestic support, and reductions in agricultural tariffs (market access). In their work, HKIW find that the export subsidy and domestic support components are, on average, poverty-increasing in their sample of 15 developing countries, as these rich country reforms raise world prices for staple foods including wheat, maize, dairy and rice. This is fully consistent with the I-M findings that higher world prices of staples raise poverty. However, these two adverse developments under the proposed Doha Development Agenda are dominated by the third pillar of reform – namely agricultural tariff reductions in the rich countries.
Developing countries remain subject to many tariffs on heavily-protected agricultural commodities. Furthermore, these tariffs are often specified on a $/ton basis (i.e. specific tariffs), so that countries exporting low unit value products are more heavily penalized. Removal of such tariffs disproportionately benefits low income exporters. Finally, rich countries impose many high tariffs on processed agricultural products. Removing tariffs on these products—which are considered in HKIW but not in I-M—permits developing countries to shift into higher value exports. In summary, it is hardly surprising that tariff cuts on all agricultural products in rich countries would have a different impact on poverty than world-wide price rises for staple foods.
At this point, it is useful to reference a follow-on paper to the HKIW piece. This follow-on paper focuses on a set of trade reforms that allow more direct comparison with the results in the I-M paper. In their follow-on paper, HKIW argue that, as proposed, the Doha Development Agenda is less poverty friendly than the trade reforms not undertaken in the DDA. They argue that this is due to the excessive reliance of the DDA on reductions in export subsidies and domestic support (both poverty increasing in poor countries), and its relative neglect of agricultural tariff cuts in developing countries. The latter, they find, are poverty reducing in all but one of their 15 countries. Furthermore, the mechanism for poverty reduction is closely related to the one identified by I-M, namely lower domestic prices for food.
Summary:
In summary, the HKIW work (taking into account both of their recent papers) and the I-M paper are remarkably consistent. Both find that higher prices for staple foods in developing countries will tend to raise poverty. Of course, the specifics depend on the source of these higher prices. Ivanic and Martin are silent on this point, while HKIW consider a variety of sources for price changes, including: elimination of rich country agricultural export subsidies, reductions in rich country farm support, and agricultural tariff cuts in rich and poor countries.
The current commodity crisis is precipitated by other factors, including record-low stocks, adverse weather events and biofuel mandates. Our work does indeed suggest that this “perfect storm” in commodity markets bodes ill for the world’s poorest households.
Sincerely,
Thomas Hertel, Purdue University: [email protected]
Will Martin, The World Bank: [email protected]
Dani,
this passage needs to be revised:
"...a World Bank study by Ivanic and Martin which argued that the poor would benefit from a rise in world prices in a clear majority of developing nations that these authors looked at."
Posted by: Melvin | May 06, 2008 at 01:32 PM
Melvin --
Thanks for the close reading. Correction done.
Posted by: Dani Rodrik | May 06, 2008 at 01:46 PM
Might the differing results in the two studies arise from differences in the commodities examined? Most importantly, the Hertel et al piece includes price increases in cotton in its analysis, while the Ivanic and Martin does not.
There are also differences in methodology. Ivanic and Martin is a partial equilibrium analysis, but also considers unskilled wage effects. Hertel et al use a modified CGE framework.
Posted by: Richard | May 06, 2008 at 05:14 PM
A close look at the Hertel study shows that the "high prices are bad for the poor except under Doha" is still a hollow argument.
Hertel is right to model a "Doha scenario" and a "full liberalization" scenario in this paper and many other based on the same GTAPish model runs. The "Doha Scenario" looks fairly close to the deal on the table (which is far from fully liberalizing all tariffs and subsidies).
The "Doha Scenario" here would only bring 2.5 of the 622 million people living under $1 dollar per day over the poverty line (0.4 percent). You could argue that there are better, cheaper, less costly (the tariff revenue losses for developing countries under the deal on the table are $63 billion) ways to bring these folks above the poverty line.
Also, let us remember that the model runs can simply reveal bringing an individual from $1 per day to $1.01 dollars per day then shazam they are "out" of extreme poverty....
Posted by: Gallagher | May 06, 2008 at 07:38 PM
I would like to ask Prof. Rodrik if farm protectionism will help African countries to face the current world food crisis in the light of the following article:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4306
Thank you!
Posted by: Antonio | May 07, 2008 at 05:15 PM
I don't know what professor Rodrik thinks but I think this is really interesting! Ghana seems to be pursuing a similar strategy. And Mali has been very successful at promoting rice production. One problem in Ghana though is that people have become accustomed to the taste of imported rice and they complain that the domestic rice is of inferior quality. This seems like a problem that could be overcome. And promoting domestic rice production in Ghana would have a large impact on poverty reduction since most of the poorest people in Ghana live in the north where rice is grown.
Posted by: madmax | May 08, 2008 at 06:03 AM
Hertel and Martin your response leaves me more confused. If the estimates in the most recent paper are correct then the current rise in food prices will increase the global poverty headcount by more than 100 million. This is a huge effect, isn't it? How can it be that this effect is small enough so as to be more or less ignored (certainly not emphasized) in your previous work? Is it also because the magnitudes of the price changes are different? What is really going on here? And, BTW, what does the World Bank plan to do about it?
Posted by: befuddled | May 08, 2008 at 06:37 AM
It's important to be very careful here with your measures here. For example, if you just use per capita GDP you may find that higher food prices mean higher per capita GDP because a small minority makes a lot more money even if there are far more people who plunge into dire poverty.
I know statistics are kept on the number of calories per day. If you could find whether when food prices go up, the percentage of the countries population on less than 1,200 calories per day goes up, that would be very valuable and non-misleading information. This is the kind of thing studies should look at so that they aren't misleading.
Richard Serlin
Blog:http://richardhserlin.blogspot.com
Posted by: Richard H. Serlin | May 08, 2008 at 03:14 PM
I forget the source (perhaps it was Rodrik himself), but a good rule of thumb seems to be that countries which are 'price takers' will be hurt by global price increases whilst those which are 'price makers' will tend to benefit, depending on the commodity.
The longer term political questions seem to be how governments will securitise food policy: Will they throw up export barriers and build stockpiles, beggaring thy neighbor? Will they strive for 'self-sufficiency' or autarky through import barriers, opening the door to politically-risky shortages? Will the current crisis help or hinder agricultural liberalisation in the Doha round?
Since food policy impinges much more directly on welfare than, arguably, energy policy, it's probably only a matter of time before the constraints of climate change, population growth and middle-class expectations make food policy more about competition than cooperation.
A recent spate of recent articles about China and the Middle East buying up producing land abroad will probably catalyse the issue...
Posted by: Jonathan | May 12, 2008 at 07:34 AM
Dear Dani, I think one source of confusion in this issue is the difference between the size of the price change and the speed. A price rise spread out over 10 years is very different to one that occurs in the space of 2 0r 3 years in a market where supply responses are slow. The current rise constitues a crisis because the ability of governments and populations to reallocate resources to agriculture in the short run is very limited. I am not sure how this affects the Doha-round estimates, but Ivanic and Martin's methodology seems more appropriate for the current situation.
Posted by: Derek Headey | May 12, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Nike Shox|Nike Shox Sale is special for you with a very pretty design
Posted by: nike shox sale | January 09, 2010 at 04:11 AM
Don't waste your time on a man/woman, who isn't willing to waste their time on you.
Posted by: Ugg london | January 11, 2010 at 09:32 PM
CHI flat iron by Farouk system. Direct from the manufacturer, this genuine Chi ceramic iron comes with valid, one year warranty!
Posted by: chi flat iron | January 14, 2010 at 04:02 AM
I think it's helpful to have on hand the large number of reset so good that we can find in these blogs
as these we can be helpful
Posted by: buy viagra | April 06, 2010 at 04:36 PM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 10:43 PM
GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | April 22, 2010 at 01:49 AM
Thank you for introducing me the useful information.And .....Totally boring. can you tell me where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.thank you!
Posted by: mbt shoes sale | May 05, 2010 at 08:27 PM
Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.
Posted by: birkenstock | May 06, 2010 at 01:09 AM
Nice news,thanks you for this good sharing.
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 08, 2010 at 07:42 AM
私はアメリカではないので、ブログの記事は、よく書かれて、私はとても好き読み取り、すべての単語の私は非常に理解、ほとんどまだ読んでいないが、私はあなたの資料では、知識を学ぶことを望んでまた、我々は良い友達になることを願って。ありがとうございました! !
Posted by: replica rolex paypal | May 20, 2010 at 03:29 AM
Good information about Food prices and poverty.
.......alex
Posted by: viagra online | May 29, 2010 at 01:21 AM
Perhaps the problem is with the misnomer "developing country". Countries that don't have the basics of "peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice" may well indeed be caught in a Malthusian trap where greater national income gets translated into high population but not per capita GDP.
Posted by: who called me | June 09, 2010 at 02:18 AM
This is something that we should try to study so that no one will suffer.
Posted by: square dining tables | June 11, 2010 at 09:59 PM
I haven't really noticed much of this new intellectual climate here amongst development practitioners in Africa. But perhaps that is because there aren't many intellectuals here.
Posted by: Acronym List | June 23, 2010 at 03:32 AM
The problem is that in poor country they are making food that they sell abroad
Posted by: t-shirt star | July 06, 2010 at 08:22 AM
I already have my [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/mbt-changa-c-17.html]MBT Changa[/url] shoes more than 6 months - using mainly taken the 3-4 mile walk. Once you become comfortable walking shoes, main battle tanks, you will find that your leg muscles work the way you will not encounter in normal shoes. For the first few times you wear, about 20 minutes after the pain disappears, it seems effortless and walking.
Shorten your stride, faster, of course, you go straight you pull back and stomach in.
You may have heard on one of the points is to go a mile in the main battle tank shoes, walking shoes are common in the exercise equivalent of two miles. I can not find any research confirms this view.
Personally, I noticed that my muscles get more exercise when I wear [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/mbt-chapa-gtx-c-18.html]Cheap MBT Chapa GTX Shoes[/url]. Since I bought them, I would like to walk more and longer distances, leading to weight loss.
I have chronic back pain my entire adult life, and to walk in these shoes shift away the pressure on my back. I have discussed, who also has a few people [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/mbt-lami-c-24.html]Discount MBT Lami Shoes[/url], they say, they are the only shoes to wear, because they reduce their back pain.
Posted by: http://www.mbtsandal.com | July 08, 2010 at 04:33 AM
Your passion walker fitness or weight in different ways? Is there a better option is to [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/mbt-mwalk-c-25.html]MBT M.WALK[/url] shoes. Your shoes will improve posture, strengthen the main battle tanks for sale many different muscles and help burn more calories. But you may decide to buy a stumbling block, the price is in his shoes. Not everyone can afford sneakers.The way, we main battle tank manufacturers, direct impact on our health. If we go straight to the Health and spinal cord is still the correct position of the knee. On the contrary, if we follow the wrong attitude, we have to have some physical pain.
So I decided to go to Marseilles, [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/mbt-sport-c-29.html]Discount MBT Sport Shoes[/url], barefoot shoes clean technology. The technology for the manufacture of main battle tanks and sports shoes.
Doctors and physical therapists are so fascinated, their ultimate use and recommend these [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/mbt-sport-grey-c-3.html]MBT Sport Grey[/url] shoes, their patients.
Posted by: http://www.mbtsandal.com | July 08, 2010 at 04:37 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 11:38 PM
I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 04:56 AM
I think this is a great post. One thing that I find the most helpful is number five. Sometimes when I write, I just let the flow of the words and information come out so much that I loose the purpose. It’s only after editing when I realize what I’ve done. There’s defiantly a lot of great tips here I’m going to try to be more aware of.
Posted by: jordans for sale | August 23, 2010 at 04:01 AM
I’ve seen progression in every post. Your newer posts are simply wonderful compared to your posts in the past. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 02:46 AM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 08:37 PM
I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.thank you!
Posted by: VRS | September 02, 2010 at 03:32 AM
The poverty is a very complicated topic that includes many aspects that we can mentioned, for example, many people live in poverty because do not have money to buy food because the food prices are so high....
Posted by: Generic Viagra | September 13, 2010 at 12:34 PM
The first stage Wedding Dresses of spring wedding will give you so many things to plan and organize. Taking some time first to think and jot down some initial wedding ideas or Evening Gowns themes is really important before referring to any wedding vendors or Evening Dresses
venues. In this way, you will be able to easily conceptualize the perfect touches Quinceanera Dresses for your spring wedding day.As we all know, spring is the mark of time of birth and renewal. Having your wedding in this beautiful season can bestow a marriage life full of excitement and adventure.
Posted by: weddingdresses | September 15, 2010 at 09:46 PM
I can't believe how much of this I just wasn't aware of. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. I'm truly grateful and really impressed.
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | October 01, 2010 at 06:38 AM
Perhaps the problem is with the misnomer "developing country". Countries that don't have the basics of "peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable
Posted by: R4i | November 11, 2010 at 04:47 AM
The poverty is a very complicated topic that includes many aspects that we can mentioned, for example,
Posted by: favourite Jewellery | November 11, 2010 at 04:48 AM
The poverty is a very complicated topic that includes many aspects that we can mentioned,
Posted by: R4 ds | November 11, 2010 at 04:49 AM
I love my oven because I can bake all I want, My oven is very large, sometimes I can bake several recipes to the same time and it saves me time. Really
helpful.
Posted by: burberry outlet | November 12, 2010 at 09:47 AM
Dubai is a financial hub as well as a focal point to accelerate global imports and exports. Dubai, in actual fact, promotes businesses and trading to a great level. Whether you are a simple shopper, business giant or a small & medium enterprise owner, Dubai is a city for you.
Posted by: Dubai Sale | November 30, 2010 at 07:38 AM
yes,Great site. This could probably have the refactoring tag added t it.
http://www.sedanshoppers.se
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 13, 2010 at 04:54 AM
raf
Thanks for article. It's good.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 20, 2011 at 04:59 AM
columbus injury lawyer
I always enjoy reading your posts and I look forward to your next one.
Posted by: Ohioguide | February 18, 2011 at 11:35 PM
Nice article, great!I like it, thanks for sharing it with us. its worth reading!
Sell House |
Wholesale Real Estate |
Posted by: renl | March 26, 2011 at 02:54 PM
Hey I absolutely love this write-up and it was so nice so I am surely going to tweet it. I Have to say the Indepth research this article has is greatly extraordinary !!! Who goes that extra mile now days? Well Done !
Hotels In Nice
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 05, 2011 at 04:38 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks for this ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 07, 2011 at 09:58 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 01:53 PM
To meet the needs of 98,600 people who have been severely affected by a worsening food crisis, ADRA is partnering with Africare, a U.S.-based non-profit organization, to improve food access among families. Hoping that other entities will help too, to improve the crisis.
Owatrol Additives
Posted by: Account Deleted | September 01, 2011 at 09:16 PM
Nice discussion is going on there I like it so much keep on asking and learning new things…
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 10, 2011 at 01:54 PM
Saying thank you is a virtue. It is plausible learning to utter such. Some don't even dare to say such.Formula 21 Formen Gece Gözlüğü panax My Slimmer
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 01, 2012 at 12:27 PM
I try and learn something new everyday. Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge manzaralar zayıflama oyunlar yemek tarifleri
Posted by: orjin krem | May 02, 2012 at 10:49 AM
I try and learn something new everyday. Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge manzaralar zayıflama oyunlar yemek tarifleri
Posted by: orjin krem | May 02, 2012 at 10:50 AM
I try and learn something new everyday. Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge manzaralar zayıflama oyunlar yemek tarifleri
Posted by: orjin krem | May 02, 2012 at 10:51 AM
powerpoint file corrupted
Thanks for the interesting article!
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 28, 2012 at 02:21 AM
Food prices are steadily going up, even in the States. Inflation rears its ugly head :*
SELL YOUR HOUSE NASHVILLE
Posted by: Brian Ellwood | June 04, 2012 at 10:31 AM
Couldn't agree more
SELL YOUR HOUSE NASHVILLE
Posted by: Brian Ellwood | June 04, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Hi Dani,
Enjoy To reader your write
Creating History Together With ArenaBetting Piala Eropa 2012
Iklan Internet Murah Efektif Berkualitas Indonesia
Motor Matic Injeksi Irit Harga Murah – Yamaha Mio J
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 07, 2012 at 09:51 AM
The evidence against the defendants is such an obvious forgery that even a child would recognize it as such. Imagine, if you can, something that is a cross between the Moscow show trials and the Salem witchcraft hysteria, and you will not be too far off. london flats for rent
Posted by: Calvin Brock | December 21, 2012 at 06:02 AM
My friend mentioned to me your blog, so I thought I’d read it for myself. Very interesting insights, will be back for more!
haber haberler
oyun oyna oyunlar
volvo özel servis
Posted by: HnOyun | March 12, 2013 at 09:34 AM