Those of you who think I use this blog to blog my own horn way too much, read no further. (If not in my own blog, where else? But still...) But I was particularly pleased to read John Kay's review of my One Economics, Many Recipes in Prospect magazine (is this the same John Kay as the FT columnist John Kay?).
You need a subscription to read the whole thing, but here are some excerpts:
[Rodrik's] thesis leaves little role for the breastbeating of moralists who want to hold colonialism, multinationals or unfair trading arrangements responsible for third world poverty. Countries find and create their own destinies. Nor does he have time for the visiting expert with a chequebook and a sense of mission. Rodrik's heroes are not the framers of the millennium development goals, but the people who establish cut-flower nurseries in Colombia, football production lines in Pakistan and bicycle factories in Taiwan. Development, he argues, is a process of self-discovery.
....
At various points, Rodrik is anxious to say, "I am a mainstream economist." His credo is that "social phenomena can best be understood by considering them to be an aggregation of purposeful behaviour by individuals interacting with each other and acting under the constraints that their environment imposes." There is certainly truth in the claim that this belief is at the core of neo-classical economics. But neoclassical economics, as typically practised, imposes a particular concept of rationality on that description-in terms of the consistent pursuit of individualist goals-and makes a variety of other assumptions about the nature of markets and of property rights. These assumptions preclude a proper examination of the institutional constraints and uncertain environment which are such an important part of Rodrik's schema.
But then so much the worse for the mainstream.... One Economics, Many Recipes is also a model of how applied economics should be done. The book uses models without falling into the trap of believing that any particular model offers a true representation of the world, or that policy conclusions can be derived algebraically. Rodrik uses data, but sceptically: it seems obvious that a data set which rates Canada worst and Rwanda near-best for absence of ethnic fragmentation has something wrong with it, and it is reassuring (though much less common than you might hope) to have an author who notices.
As a result, this book can identify no panaceas and, indeed, offers only a few modest pointers to development. But how to make poor countries rich is the toughest problem in economics, and only a less thoughtful author than Rodrik would offer more confident solutions.
I find it somewhat curious that the book has ben reviewed in a number of British publications by now (besides the one above, check the reviews in the New Statesman or in Times Higher Education). By contrast, no reviews have appeared in similar American publications as far as I can tell. My editors at Princeton University Press should take note...
I just managed to get hold of a copy and am marching through chapter two at the moment.
All I can say is that it's not light reading!
If you have dates for the original essays, it is not obvious as I read. Since they weren't updated a date helps put things in context, even when the topics being discussed are of a historical nature.
Posted by: robertdfeinman | March 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Well, there's this:
http://underbelly-buce.blogspot.com/2008/03/its-worse-than-you-think.html
(and the much better known Crooked Timber symposium from a few months back)
Posted by: Buce | March 22, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Thank you Bruce, I was thinking of print media. And robertdfeinman, you are right it's not light reading. But it is an academic book after all, and at least I think it is more readable than most of its genre.
Posted by: Dani Rodrik | March 22, 2008 at 12:57 PM
I haven't read your book Dani, but I am discomforted when I read the reviewer's claims that colonialism, multinational corporations, and our current trade regimes are not among your culprits.
And when I read that "countries find and create their own destinies" my skepticism level increased again.
These claims seem somewhat at odds with what I've read here on your blog over the past few months.
Now, obviously, to the extent that countries can escape the legacy of suborination left by colonialism, MNCs, and our current trade regimes, and find and create their own destinies- so much the better. But to disavow or downplay the heirarchical power relations of the past and present seems unhelpful to getting to the place of self determination.
But again, those are the reviewer's words- not yours.
Posted by: dale | March 22, 2008 at 01:24 PM
Buce, not Bruce. But I'm a fine one to complain; I gave a bad cite to my own work. Should be:
http://underbelly-buce.blogspot.com/2008/03/notes-on-dani-rodrik.html
[Rodrik's book is surely not "worse than you think." BTW I hope to do a comparison with Baumol et al, Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism, shortly--Buce.]
Posted by: Buce | March 22, 2008 at 04:44 PM
Dani,
Speaking of blogging your own horn, and your observation that Americans aren't necessarily your most receptive audience...
would you consider a promotional speaking tour in Australia?
Posted by: Dominic | March 22, 2008 at 05:58 PM
It seems to be the same John Kay who wrote "The truth about markets:why some nations are rich but most remain poor":
http://www.johnkay.com/
Posted by: gaddeswarup | March 22, 2008 at 06:17 PM
Also, the in the current FT there is a review:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d0665784-f7b2-11dc-ac40-000077b07658.html
Posted by: David | March 22, 2008 at 08:53 PM
EPW has a chapter by chapter review:
http://www.epw.org.in/epw/user/viewAbstract.jsp
Click on 'View Full Article'.
Posted by: gaddeswarup | March 22, 2008 at 09:32 PM
I too am not happy to have seen more reviews of it. The review you cite is excellent and matches my views of it.
I like how the reviewer notes your lack of clear solutions. I wasn't sure what to make of that fact and thought maybe I missed something when reading it.
I really enjoyed it. It now sits on my bookshelf next to Bryan Capan's recent book.
Funny, they look similar from far away. The size and cover style are identical.
Overall, I'm glad to have read it. One of the best books I've read this year...
Posted by: John V | March 23, 2008 at 09:45 PM
And it's still not at the NYPL, and out of stock (if it was ever there) at Strand Books.
Did Princeton just pass on the easy (i.e., library) sales and getting out any review copies?
Posted by: Ken Houghton | March 24, 2008 at 05:45 PM
Dear Dani,
I wrote a review of this book in french !
http://www.nonfiction.fr/article-175-pas_de_recette_unique_pour_le_developpement.htm
Great book !thank you
E.M
Posted by: Eric | March 25, 2008 at 11:26 AM
Eric --
Thank you. My mother will be especially pleased, as her French is a lot better than her English. And since she will no doubt read this and the review, I am glad you think well of both me and my book. Phew!
Posted by: Dani Rodrik | March 25, 2008 at 12:12 PM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
http://www.watchvisa.com
http://www.watchvisa.com/breitling-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/cartier-watches.html
Posted by: rolex watches | February 25, 2010 at 10:00 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM
They should take up building BVLGARI Watches dams for power generation. We should FRANCK MULLER watches learn from china. They have the world's largest dam for power CHANEL Watches production, it alone produces 22,000 MW of LONGINES Watch power. So, unless the government opens up the economy more for iwc watches foreign investors, this power cut problem is a life long disease every hublot-watches india will need to face.
http://www.watchvisa.com/bvlgari-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/chanel-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/franck_muller-watches.html
Posted by: bvlgari watches | February 26, 2010 at 01:26 AM
Thank you Bruce, I was thinking of print media. And robertdfeinman, you are right it's not light reading. But it is an academic book after all, and at least I think it is more readable than most of its genre.
Posted by: Supra Skytop Purple Black | April 08, 2010 at 12:55 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 02:08 AM
So, some tip about this issue are welcome and really sorry if my question is very simple. Thanks in advance
Posted by: replica handbags | May 29, 2010 at 05:56 AM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. My readers have about the same interets
Posted by: xiaoye | October 10, 2010 at 04:16 AM
Very good post. Made me realize I was totally wrong about this issue. I figure that one learns something new everyday. Mrs Right learned her lesson! Nice, informative website by the way.
Posted by: supra shoes | November 11, 2010 at 01:40 AM
raf
Thanks so much for article.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 20, 2011 at 07:00 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 01, 2011 at 03:30 AM
Raf
raf
Good Job ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 08, 2011 at 04:06 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 21, 2011 at 11:51 AM
This is one of my favorite blogs and a place that I visit daily, I find so many interesting articles here, so as a Forex trader, it keeps me in good shape and I am able to perform very well. It is already great platform for me with OctaFX broker and their awesome daily market news and analysis service, it makes me feel highly comfortable and relax and I don’t even have to pay any fees for it, so that is another plus point for me.
Posted by: DjNasir | January 18, 2016 at 02:08 AM