The Irish economy (the "Celtic tiger") has become the envy of many others ever since it took off in the 1990s. Behind the miracle lies sensible fiscal policies, a wage accord with labor, and--surprise, surprise--a range of industrial policies. The New York Times explains how Enterprise Ireland, a government agency, works. The agency takes equity positions in startup firms, leases space in Midtown Manhattan to provide accommodation for young Irish firms looking to expand in the U.S., helps set up operations in China by hooking up Irish firms with Chinese government officials, and finances R&D.
Colm O’Gorman, who teaches entrepreneurship in master of business administration courses at Dublin City University, said the government agency is at the heart of several trends. Enterprise Ireland “supports research and development at Irish companies and universities,” Professor O’Gorman said, “and it is encouraging more women to become entrepreneurs, as the role of women has changed in Irish life.”
And oh, the corporate tax rate is only 12.5 percent, which must help too.
Perhaps you are being a bit tongue-in-cheek, but I would have led with the corporate tax rate :-)
Posted by: Justin Rietz | January 17, 2008 at 08:33 PM
and maybe you should also mention the billions of euros of transfer payments that ireland received (and is now not willing to share with other countries).
Posted by: Carsten | January 17, 2008 at 08:42 PM
I've heard a couple people claim (or imply) that industrial policies can be good for development. I presume that that the claim is that such policies provide some public good or correct some other market failure, but I have not seen an explanation of these public goods (or what the other market failures are) . Could you explain why industrial policies can work or point to someone who already does? I think such an explanation would go a long way towards convincing people with strong libertarian leanings to be more amenable to industrial policy. If no one has a good explanation for what those market failures are (which certainly doesn't automatically mean they don't exist) could you say that?
Posted by: jsalvati | January 17, 2008 at 11:16 PM
On industrial policy, doesn't the effect size matter more than sign?
All countries have some measure of industrial policy. It's not surprising we'd find it countries that have done well economically.
Posted by: Will Ambrosini | January 17, 2008 at 11:28 PM
The "billions of euros of transfer payments" is a complete canard - the serious estimates suggest that transfer payments had at most a quite moderate impact. Much more important were the canny development of industrial policy, a virtuous circle of returning-emigrants-with-skills boosting GDP and making it more attractive for yet more emigrants to return, access to European markets and the industrial peace that prevailed as a result of a proto-corporatist arrangement between unions, employers,government and a plethora of minor social partners.
The piece linked to is considerably better than the average US depiction of Ireland. For some reason, libertarian think tanks keep on depicting Ireland as an example of the success of free markets, which misses out on most of the real story. As an emigrant Irishman I've become an aficionado of this particular brand of globollocks - a piece by Tom Friedman at http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/01/opinion/01friedman.html?ex=1277870400&en=342cb2bd52a44f4e&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss, from a couple of years back is a particularly fine example of the genre.
Posted by: Henry Farrell | January 18, 2008 at 12:12 AM
"The Irish economy (the "Celtic tiger") has become the envy of many others ever since it took off in the 1990s. Behind the miracle lies sensible fiscal policies, a wage accord with labor, and--surprise, surprise--a range of industrial policies."--Dani Rodrik
For an interesting paper on "The Institutional Determinants of Wage Moderation" by Lucio Baccaro and Marco Simoni go here:
http://mitsloan.mit.edu/iwer/pdf/baccarosimoni.pdf
The conclusion is presented on page 40. They argue for how Ireland and Italy found a path to wage controls that didn't break with democracy and therefore produced a solution seen as legitimate. (Don't miss their footnote at the bottom of page 41.)
A non-democratic statement about the way to wage moderation is presented by Belgian's ACV at the bottom of page 30.
Posted by: wjd123 | January 18, 2008 at 03:17 AM
jsalvati - Dani's got a good paper on exactly this:
http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~drodrik/UNIDOSep.pdf
Posted by: Adam Jackson | January 18, 2008 at 05:35 AM
There is a very good book that came out last year titled "Foreign Investment, Development, and Globalization: Can Costa Rica become Ireland?" by economist Eva Paus (http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~epaus/book/newbook.html).
The book shows how Ireland was not only able to attract FDI but coupled attraction policy with industrial policy to build endogenous industrial capacity. Conversely, Costa Rica has attracted a lot of FDI (most notably Intel) but it has failed to translate into spillovers and economic growth because they dismantled industrial policies.
Interesting for Ireland, the source of funds for many of their industrial policies were through the social funds allocated through EU accession. Costa Rica, through the CAFTA agreement will get no such help.
Posted by: Gallagher | January 18, 2008 at 08:44 AM
Ireland's workforce was boosted by the age structure of the population as well as greatly increased participation of women in the labour market. That the workforce was both well-educated and English speaking helped.
Also: German recession + monetary union = low interest rates = credit and property fuelled boom.
Anyone have any thoughts on these points?
Posted by: DC | January 18, 2008 at 01:54 PM
I’ve shepherded many clients into Irish headquarters and plants, and the only attraction anyone mentioned was the low tax rate, cheap labor and access to European markets. Foreign investment, more than a shag pad in Manhattan, turned Ireland into a tiger.
Its the same three reasons that explain why 750,000 cars are made in Slovakia and pharmaceuticals were, until repeal of favorable tax laws, made in Puerto Rico. Its why the OECD wants to eliminate “tax competition”. Low taxes and cheap, unregulated labor markets in free trade zones are generating all of China’s growth. If I were president of Cuba or North Korea, I would (1) eliminate corporate tax, (2) annihilate any social safety net to force people to take jobs, (3) beg foreign investors to set up shop, and (4) shoot officials who demand bribes or promulgate self-aggrandizing regulation. This approach has delivered millions from poverty in the forgoing countries (although Ireland and Slovakia never shot anyone, I think).
Posted by: $9,000,000,000 Write Off | January 18, 2008 at 07:16 PM
I agree with Will's point.
Posted by: Jorge | January 18, 2008 at 07:47 PM
Adam Jackson - Awesome! Thanks.
Posted by: jsalvati | January 18, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Dani Rodrik “and--surprise, surprise--a range of industrial policies. The New York Times explains how Enterprise Ireland, a government agency, works.”
Absolutely anything could work but the question now is will it be able to keep on working. Success carries the seeds of its own disaster and this does seem very true when it comes to government agencies falling into the trap of thinking “now we know how to do developing”.
As I see it you have to be able to continuously mix, in equal proportions, the enthusiasm that comes from the certainty that one way or another you will figure out how to succeed, with the humility that comes with accepting at all times that you really haven’t the foggiest about how to do it.
Posted by: Per Kurowski | January 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM
I also have assisted quite a few firms to set up shop and to transfer valuable amounts of know-how and other intangibles to Ireland. One of the major factors for this migration is the low corporate tax rate and the help that the Irish government provides to those firms to make the transition as profitable as possible.
Posted by: gabriel | January 20, 2008 at 01:03 PM
The tax rate is key. I've worked in finance at two very large US tech firms that have used transfer pricing to shift large profits to Ireland. I've seen internal sales reports that show large sales in the EU (France, UK, Germany, etc.) but other accting reports that show most of the EU area profits in Ireland -- a country with a very small population. Why would a company that does huge business with banks, for example, show more profits in Ireland than in England? Many companies have whole departments that focus on transfer pricing. The tax rate is key and it would be interesting to see more research on how much of the GDP increase in Ireland is a product of paper profits and how much is real economic activity.
Posted by: AK | January 22, 2008 at 12:20 AM
Ak, I think Ireland is fairly often used as an example why GNP is a better measure for wealth than GDP. Irelands GNP is almost a quarter lower than its GDP, while for most countries these are very similar.
So, looking at GNP Ireland is not entirely the miracle economy it appears to be, but it is still showing lots of growth, and most people seem to agree that behind the paper numbers really is a healthy development.
The really tricky question is not how much of the growth is fictitious, since that's relatively easy to figure out from the numbers. What is crucial is how much of the real growth consists of 'spill-over' effects from the paper money flows. If companies put their paper headquarters in ireland for tax reasons, and then also put their real headquarters there, or when they invest profits in Ireland to avoid repatriation taxes, then the effects can well be real growth for the Irish.
But if it turns out this is the main reason for Ireland's growth, than the recipe might less useful for larger, non-English-speaking countries or countries without access to the EU.
It would interesting to see what effect Irish policies would hve in, say, Hungary.
Posted by: GreatZamfir | January 22, 2008 at 06:15 AM
Ak, I think Ireland is fairly often used as an example why GNP is a better measure for wealth than GDP. Irelands GNP is almost a quarter lower than its GDP, while for most countries these are very similar.
So, looking at GNP Ireland is not entirely the miracle economy it appears to be, but it is still showing lots of growth, and most people seem to agree that behind the paper numbers really is a healthy development.
The really tricky question is not how much of the growth is fictitious, since that's relatively easy to figure out from the numbers. What is crucial is how much of the real growth consists of 'spill-over' effects from the paper money flows. If companies put their paper headquarters in ireland for tax reasons, and then also put their real headquarters there, or when they invest profits in Ireland to avoid repatriation taxes, then the effects can well be real growth for the Irish.
But if it turns out this is the main reason for Ireland's growth, than the recipe might less useful for larger, non-English-speaking countries or countries without access to the EU.
It would interesting to see what effect Irish policies would hve in, say, Hungary.
Posted by: GreatZamfir | January 22, 2008 at 06:18 AM
For someone who lived through the Celtic Tiger I cant say I have benefited much from it. Sure Ireland has created more jobs in the last 15 years but so have most countries. Irelands GDP is unrealistic as a comparison with other countries as the figures are distorted by Transfer Payments from multinational corporations with an operation in Ireland funnelling billions of dollars through it. Take Google for example has an small operation in Ireland relative to its overall global operations yet it accounts for a huge amount of Googles income, the purpose of this is to reduce Googles tax bill.
During the Celtic Tiger years (which by the way is well and truly over) the Irish government got in lots of extra taxes. It agreed wage deals with state employees and everyone was happy. Now state employees are about 10% better paid than those in the private sector. The government is no longer collecting enough in taxes to pay all these employees and is now cutting back public expenditure in areas of health, education etc to balance their books.
The effect is that Ireland is drifting back to the mess that it spent the last 15 years dragging itself out of.
Sure Ireland probably wont ever revert to the disaster it was in the 80's however only a handfull of Irish benefited from the boom and most of that was capitalising on the increase in house prices but it has no left the country in a very imbalanced position where young couples cant afford a house and have to move miles away from where they grew up. Consequently people are spending hours in traffic getting to and from work. 3 hours a day in traffic is not unusual. Very poor childcare means many young families drop their kids to a creche at 6:30 or 7am and collect them at 7pm and have them in bed by 8pm so they can get them up the next day by 6am. Average creche costs €1,000 per child per month. Average mortgage costs about €2,000 per month. Thats about €70,000 gross salary before you buy food or clothes. Thats not much of a life and it is typical of thousands of young families.
So while the economic stats look great for Ireland the reality on the ground is very different.
Posted by: Tony | August 13, 2008 at 03:57 AM
With regard to the key reason for Ireland's attractiveness for FDI, I recall reading a paper some years ago about the Irish software industry. ( http://siepr.stanford.edu/conferences/silicon_papers/aagtjuly.pdf). The authors calculated that the "productivity" of indigeneous Irish software firms in 1997 was about one-eighth that of Irish-based MNC's - amounting to over $500,000 per employee per year at that time. Their comment on this divergence is notably restrained: "This last comparison in part may be
due to the fact that fiscal incentives spur MNCs to increase their revenues in Ireland."
Tony's more general comments seem to echo the themes of David McWilliams' entertaining, if hastily written, recent book http://www.amazon.co.uk/Generation-Game-David-McWilliams/dp/0717142248
Posted by: Alan S | August 16, 2008 at 05:09 PM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
http://www.watchvisa.com
http://www.watchvisa.com/breitling-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/cartier-watches.html
Posted by: rolex watches | February 25, 2010 at 10:07 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 12:03 AM
They should take up building BVLGARI Watches dams for power generation. We should FRANCK MULLER watches learn from china. They have the world's largest dam for power CHANEL Watches production, it alone produces 22,000 MW of LONGINES Watch power. So, unless the government opens up the economy more for iwc watches foreign investors, this power cut problem is a life long disease every hublot-watches india will need to face.
http://www.watchvisa.com/bvlgari-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/chanel-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/franck_muller-watches.html
Posted by: bvlgari watches | February 26, 2010 at 01:36 AM
On industrial policy, doesn't the effect size matter more than sign?
All countries have some measure of industrial policy. It's not surprising we'd find it countries that have done well economically.
Posted by: Supra Skytop Blue High | April 08, 2010 at 12:29 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 10:23 PM
The good news, thank you!
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 16, 2010 at 07:30 AM
MBT shoes disposal hip answer cold:
MBT shoes to wear only the rows of cold, rotation step foot in front of moving to do is build a launch interval, the hip flexor is stretched a little shop. Temper and stretch muscles to change arbitrarily effective joint stability, joint extension push to close section of reducing the pressure of reducing pain and sadness. Answer a few hip near buttock muscles because there is no balance due.
http://www.mbtshoes1998.com
Posted by: discount mbt shoes | July 11, 2010 at 03:28 AM
The sea can accommodate all, so we just to see the sea, our heart is infinitely more freedom and broad!
Posted by: Jordans Sneakers | July 16, 2010 at 07:34 PM
I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 02:48 AM
I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 02:48 AM
I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 03:21 AM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. Came across your blog when I was searching bing I have found the bit of info that
I found to be quite useful.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 22, 2010 at 11:20 PM
Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes for sale | August 23, 2010 at 10:37 PM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 07:44 PM
Lubechem International develops and manufactures a comprehensive range of technologically-advanced lubricants for a variety of needs that enhance the performance in engines, machineries and other equipments.
Posted by: industrial lubricants | September 21, 2010 at 04:54 AM
raf
Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 21, 2011 at 04:25 AM
Even if I don't always agree with your posts, I always appreciate reading them. Hotels in Columbus
Posted by: 3Dhomemovies | February 03, 2011 at 10:10 PM
As the Celtic Tiger emerged from the recession of the 1980s, one of it first harbingers was the Riverdance phenomenon. So powerful was the impact of its debut, as a filler while the countries tallied their 1994 Eurovision votes, that most people have forgotten the song that actually won that year.
Software Development Firm
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 16, 2011 at 09:57 AM
celikraf
celikraf
Thanks a lot ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 28, 2011 at 08:25 AM
good blog always comes-up with new and exciting information and while reading I have feel that this blog is really have all those quality that qualify a blog to be a good one.
Bonn Hotels
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 05, 2011 at 05:39 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks for visiting ;)
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 06, 2011 at 12:29 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks for comment ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it
sexyshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:55 PM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier
sexshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:56 PM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:57 PM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:57 PM
The positive comments and do well wishes are very motivational and greatly appreciated.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 11:15 AM
recover powerpoint presentation
Thanks for posting, good an article!
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 01, 2012 at 01:32 AM
that's great post i really like it ....
Restaurant in Karachi
Karachi Hotels
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 18, 2012 at 10:01 AM