... is Ricardo Hausmann's advice to monetary and fiscal authorities in the U.S.
I like especially the opening sentence:
The same voices that supported tough macroeconomic policies to deal with the excesses of spending and borrowing in east Asia, Russia and Latin America are today pushing for a significant relaxation in the US to deal with the so-called subprime crisis.
I wonder who Ricardo has in mind by the "same voices." Well, I don't actually. It's pretty clear...
Given Hausmann's rather one-sided views on alternative approaches to development in Latin American I wonder if isn't fair to say that he's often been 'one of those voices' and thus a quite able judge of what it takes to be one.
Posted by: just wondering | January 30, 2008 at 09:33 PM
dani
let us hope
dearest brave and candid
ricardo H
don't meet some
damn iterate job loser
in an ally
"argh
would it be doctor dick
blockin me path .. "
and his man ness
might get challenged
in the insuing cntra temps
by err
an ad hoc administation
of a killkenny
knuckle drill
Posted by: paine | January 30, 2008 at 11:49 PM
that's a great article. Perhaps it was omitted for reasons of space, but I wonder if he'd had room whether Ricardo would have included anything along the lines of strengthening the social safety net, to reduce the pain of 'adjustment'. That omission is likely to bring on a severe bout of 'you economists don't care about real people'.
Posted by: Luis Enrique | January 31, 2008 at 03:33 AM
There have been a lot of critics of this Keynesian remedy to a possible insufficiency of aggregate demand. Each seems to start with the premise that Keynes's view of macroeconomics expreseed in the General Theory is simply junk science. Well yea - if one believes in the new classical model where markets instantly clear, then we don't need "no stinking" aggregate demand stimulus.
Posted by: pgl | January 31, 2008 at 06:08 AM
Summers ...is one of them calling for long term fiscal stimulus NOW!
While he was at IBRD, the medicine we had to receive from him/his advise was a exactly how r.h. is setting up to be.
We live in parallel world. Yet not quite similar...
Posted by: hari | January 31, 2008 at 10:14 AM
“Stop behaving as whiner of first resort” Ricardo Hausmann tells the US. Do not give “the US consumer more rope with which to hang himself”. Hear hear!
But as Hausmann says not only should the US not bet all on finding a dream-adjustment like reducing the over-consumption in the US “in a way that does not hurt longer term growth” by looking at what others (China) could do for it; it needs “to keep on growing”.
The US has to be careful that the reduction of consumption does not diminish its size, since it is not only a matter of getting back into equilibrium; it is also about being able to take care of the outstanding stock of debt.
And so “Stop behaving as a whiner and get yourself some 40 million more working immigrants to help you out!” could also be a valid message.
Why should industrial China be able to use rural China for their growth and North America not Central America?
Posted by: Per Kurowski | January 31, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Can you imagine Summers is now demanding some agreed international regulatory
principles to make sure SWF don't undermine American equity capital by using "capital arbitrage".
The same guy was not at all worrried about American capital intevening either as FDI or even arbitrarily into Latin America in the good old days!
Hausman is out to take revenge for the about face by the same cynics today.
Posted by: hari | January 31, 2008 at 11:32 AM
"And so “Stop behaving as a whiner and get yourself some 40 million more working immigrants to help you out!” could also be a valid message.
Why should industrial China be able to use rural China for their growth and North America not Central America?"
right on per
i couldn't agree more
Posted by: paine | January 31, 2008 at 04:54 PM
" if one believes in the new classical model where markets instantly clear, then we don't need "no stinking" aggregate demand stimulus.'"
at long last i can agree with u
Posted by: paine | January 31, 2008 at 04:56 PM
Hmmm -- Last I checked I thought Dr. Hausmann believed that the US was so skilled at creating dark matter that it had little need to adjust ...
Back in the 1990s, my sense was that Summers often thought the IMF was too focused on fiscal adjustment when, in Summers view, the problem was often a combination of exchange rate misalignments and a shortage of liquidity. Europeans, the IMF staff and for that matter others at the Treasury tended more to toward the view that macro policy needed to be contractionary to restore confidence. Summers didn't set the global policy response in vacuum.
Despite my comment above, I should also note that I am huge fan of Dr. Hausmann's work. No other economist has his skill at coining a memorable phrase, and few are as skilled at finding new and interesting lines of inquiry.
Posted by: brad setser | January 31, 2008 at 10:04 PM
I'm a bit confused, does Hausmann's essay mean that he endorses the IMF's policies as applied in Asia, Russia and Latin America?
Posted by: cvj | January 31, 2008 at 10:28 PM
I think we need to go one further step: decrease government spending to balance out the rebates, thus leaving the budget balance unchanged. This is fiscally prudent, puts money in the hands of the people who need it, and leads to spending and investment that is more productive than that of the government (i.e. less money wasted on non-productive projects and bureaucracy).
Posted by: Justin Rietz | January 31, 2008 at 11:29 PM
There have been a lot of critics of this Keynesian remedy to a possible insufficiency of aggregate demand. Each seems to start with the premise that Keynes's view of macroeconomics expreseed in the General Theory is simply junk science. Well yea - if one believes in the new classical model where markets instantly clear, then we don't need "no stinking" aggregate demand stimulus.
Posted by: Supra Skytop Black White | April 08, 2010 at 12:24 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 03:08 AM
But such a coalition might still not work because the projections showed those two parties combined might still fall short of a majority. The gambit would also risk alienating many in Britain, a country without a constitution where political http://www.52travelworld.com maneuvers are often governed by informal convention.
Posted by: my travel | May 17, 2010 at 02:31 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 09:33 PM
I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 03:20 AM
This is a wonderful site. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 08:31 PM
I can't believe how much of this I just wasn't aware of. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. I'm truly grateful and really impressed.
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | October 15, 2010 at 06:22 AM
raf
Thanks for article.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 20, 2011 at 08:45 AM
This is a very good idea! Just want to say thank you for the information, you have to share. Just continue to write such a position. I will be your faithful reader. Thank you again.Pandora UK
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 06, 2011 at 04:51 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you !!
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 26, 2011 at 01:04 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks for visiting ;)
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 06, 2011 at 12:17 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks for comment ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 11, 2011 at 12:10 PM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier
sexshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:43 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it
sexyshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:44 PM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:44 PM
Thanks a lot for sharing this amazing knowledge with us. This site is fantastic. I always find great knowledge from it.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 10:52 AM
I always feel that we need to respect others view or approach, but never try to follow it. I am doing Forex trading and that is with OctaFX broker who are the rock star. They have awesome benefits from having small spreads at 0.1 pips, smooth trading platform like cTrader and much more, it’s all superb and helps a lot in working. I also feel comfortable with the support available which is 24/5 and makes it so likable for me.
Posted by: Jacky | April 26, 2017 at 01:35 PM