Here is what I do not understand. Why is it that anyone who says that the gains from the next trade agreement are not huge, that there are real social and distributional issues we need to confront before we strike the next trade deal, and that perhaps we need to rethink the basis of the multilateral trade regime in light of the severe legitimacy problems which it has run into--all true propositions--is immediately branded as a protectionist who wants to set the clock back?
That is the treatment that Hillary Clinton is presently getting, thanks to an interview she gave to the FT. Here is Peter Mandelson, the EU trade commissioner, as quoted in today's FT:
Politicians have a huge responsibility not to overstate the risks attached to open investment, because we have nothing to gain from a protectionist turn in global markets.
It seems likely that we are entering a period of relative vulnerability for the global economy and perversely, that is of course the moment when the logic of protectionism is most tempting.
That is why I would argue that Hillary Clinton’s doubts about the value of a Doha trade deal are misplaced.
In other words, you are a protectionist because you have doubts that the current setup for trade agreements is working. Further, you are being irresponsible because the fragile state of the world economy requires more trade agreements rather than a rethink.
What is outlandish about all of this is that no respectable economic model suggests the completion of Doha will add more than 1 percent to world GDP some ten years out--and this under the most favorable circumstances. The mental model that people like Mandelson seem to have is that the moment you take a breather on trade agreements, the whole world trade regime will collapse. There is little to justify this "bicycle theory" at the present time.
Indeed the only serious risk from not completing Doha or additional regional trade agreements is that free traders would take their own rhetoric seriously and react in unproductive ways that prove self-fulfilling.
I think the answer is a reluctance to throw it all away. Millions of man-hours of work, thousands of individuals, thousands of relationships made, and yes, thousands of bureaucratics niches carved out. The WTO and the associated national trade-policy structures are bureaucracies like any other and "bureaucratic patriotism" has to play at least some role.
I think people also recognize that trade-policy advancement has always been a near-run thing. To "start over" is to possibly never get started again.
Posted by: cljo | December 06, 2007 at 10:21 AM
I should make the point that whether or not the "bicycle theory" is justified is immaterial. If Mandelson and the rest believe it is the case, then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Posted by: cljo | December 06, 2007 at 10:56 AM
It is interesting to see how different commentators respond to Senator Clinton's comments. After reading the interview it's hard for me to see how anyone can know for sure what she means. Her trade timeout could come from concerns about fairness, thogh the only examples she offers are environmental and labor protections in trade deals. These could be used to make trade more fair, or they could be protectionism in another guise. People seem to read what they want or expect into her comments
Posted by: jdw | December 06, 2007 at 12:22 PM
This is not apropos the post but I did want to extend my congratulations for making Arnold Kling's list of best economics book of the year
http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/12/the-best-econom.html
Posted by: Holger Siebrecht | December 06, 2007 at 01:30 PM
Dani Rodrik: "Why is it that anyone who says ... is immediately branded as a protectionist who wants to set the clock back?
You said it yourself - there are barbarians on both sides.
Posted by: alex | December 06, 2007 at 04:33 PM
The excessive reaction to any criticism of free trade opens the door to "strategic protectionism". That means adopting a protectionist stance in order to persuade the free traders to make the concessions on social, distributional and legitimacy issues which they would never make if those concessions were all you asked for in the first place. If you have to wave the protectionist flag before they will listen, so be it.
Posted by: gordon | December 06, 2007 at 06:16 PM
Great !!! Excellent site. :)
Thanks so much. Pleasant to me.
Posted by: Justin Whitney | December 07, 2007 at 04:46 AM
Wonderful post. Why is that dogma oviates commen sense in all things political. When does the "the alternatives are worxse" argument finally put to death. It appears the freee traders spendt too much time studying economic and too little time studying finance. Apparently the other side of the coin doesn;t matter: we will see.
Posted by: s | December 07, 2007 at 10:42 AM
There is a huge divide in modern politics between the left and the right. So the rhetoric is more than vigorous. Large doses of vitriol are always close at hand. To first order the right is aligned with large economic interests and the left with the smaller ones. It has taken years to build a consensus within the intelegencia that free trade may well be a good thing across the wealth distribution. That, for example, the creative destruction of wiping out small merchants is compensated by Walmart's prices. To suggest the costs/benefits (distruction/creation) are not evenly distributed; and that possibly small economic actors suffer more costs and capture fewer benefits throws the whole enterprise right into the heart of what polarized the left v.s. the right.
Posted by: Ben Hyde | December 08, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Could it be that -
*HRC is politically positioning her campaign to win the election.
*What she does later, like all politicians, is a different matter...
*Bottom line is to get passed Obama and win!
Posted by: hari | December 08, 2007 at 11:58 AM
Professor Rodrik, what does your 'mental model' predict will happen if we 'take a breather' on trade negotiations?
You can't criticise the 'bicycle theory' without presenting a better alternative.
Posted by: PJ | December 08, 2007 at 03:35 PM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
http://www.watchvisa.com
http://www.watchvisa.com/breitling-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/cartier-watches.html
Posted by: rolex watches | February 25, 2010 at 10:19 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 12:25 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 09:55 PM
i like this part of the post:"What is outlandish about all of this is that no respectable economic model suggests the completion of Doha will add more than 1 percent to world GDP some ten years out--and this under the most favorable circumstances." is very good
Posted by: generic propecia | April 22, 2010 at 12:52 PM
The good news, thank you!
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 16, 2010 at 05:05 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 04:27 AM
his is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches
to change. The taking every one to task. It is rolex watcheto well paid
http://www.toplvstore.com/
http://www.louisvuitton4love.com/louis-vuitton-popincourt-long-m40008-p-913.html
Posted by: Sarah Wallet | August 13, 2010 at 11:14 AM
his is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches
to change. The taking every one to task. It is rolex watcheto well paid
http://www.toplvstore.com/
http://www.louisvuitton4love.com/louis-vuitton-popincourt-long-m40008-p-913.html
http://www.louisvuitton4love.com/
Posted by: Sarah Wallet | August 13, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. Came across your blog when I was searching bing I have found the bit of info that
I found to be quite useful.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 09:14 PM
I think this is a great post. One thing that I find the most helpful is number five. Sometimes when I write, I just let the flow of the words and information come out so much that I loose the purpose. It’s only after editing when I realize what I’ve done. There’s defiantly a lot of great tips here I’m going to try to be more aware of.
Posted by: authentic jordans | August 23, 2010 at 03:00 AM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 09:52 PM
Well now, I was searching for blogs on fitness or health when i ran across this post. although not exactly what I was expecting I will give it ****.
Posted by: Trekker | October 11, 2010 at 01:02 PM
I can't believe how much of this I just wasn't aware of. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. I'm truly grateful and really impressed.
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | October 15, 2010 at 05:54 AM
this is so and we can't avoid it
Posted by: w.a. | November 25, 2010 at 05:54 AM
raf
Thanks for article.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 21, 2011 at 07:03 AM
that perhaps we need to rethink the basis of the multilateral trade regime in light of the severe legitimacy problems which it has run into--all true propositions--is immediately branded as a protectionist who wants to set the clock back? China Wholesale Beads
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 20, 2011 at 04:23 AM
Raf
raf
Thaks for comment.
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 01, 2011 at 01:55 PM
I think you have produced several truly fascinating points. Not too many others would really think about this the way you just did. I am very impressed that there is so much about this subject that has been revealed and you made it so nicely, with so considerably class. Brilliant one, man! Very special things right here.
Hotels In Antwerp
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 05, 2011 at 05:07 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks for this ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 07, 2011 at 10:47 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 20, 2011 at 05:09 PM
I'm still learning from you, but I'm trying to achieve my goals. I certainly enjoy reading all that is posted on your blog.Keep the information coming. I loved it!
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 10, 2011 at 05:38 PM