The Cato Institute's 2007 annual report on Economic Freedom of the World has just been published. The report measures "economic freedom" based on the following:
- Size of Government: Expenditures, Taxes, and Enterprises
- Legal Structure and Security of Property Rights
- Access to Sound Money
- Freedom to Trade Internationally
- Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business.
The report is full of interesting data, but has to be handled with care. In fact, I look forward to the report every year because it gives me plenty of new evidence to play with (many of which run counter to the conclusions that the report's authors want to draw).
Here is a predictable chart, which shows that richer countries have more "economic freedom."
No surprise here.
And here is one that shows that the relationship between economic growth and Cato's index of economic freedom rates is--well, leaving out the basket cases (the bottom quartile), there is no determinate relationship.
How do we make sense of this?
I don't think we should be surprised. What the second picture reveals is the tremendous variance in economic performance among countries that pass a minimum threshold of market-orientedness. In these countries, the pursuit of ever freer markets is rarely the most appropriate government strategy. The binding constraint often lies elsewhere, and may involve more government rather than less.
A good example is El Salvador, a country that is second only to Chile in Cato's rankings of economic freedom in Latin America. (Please don't get me started on Chile's industrial policies again...) The Salvadoran economy is totally privatized, has free trade and free finance, and is dollarized. Yet it has languished in low-growth hell, and would have been in even worse dire straits if it did not receive a huge amount of remittances from Salvadorans in the U.S.
El Salvador is a prime example of the "build-it-and-they-will-come" fallacy: all you need to do is to get the basics right, and then markets will do the rest. (The analogy is Larry Summers'.) All successful countries have instead required their governments to crowd in private economic activity through inducements of various kinds. Ricardo Hausmann and I make the specific case for El Salvador here.
Some comments on the second graph:
I don't think it is a very good graph. It compares the change in something (GDP) during a certain period with the state of something else (openess, etc.) at the end of the period. It is very risky to interpret the later as the cause of the first.
Let's say, for instance, that a country had high growth rates for most of the period, but then suffered a severe crisis, and decided to open its economy in the last year of the period. In the graph, its past growth, which happened before market-friendly reforms, would be compared to a level of liberalization that only reached its present level at the last years of the period in question.
I am not saying that this is what happened to any particular country, but I believe that, as a rule, we should not compare change in variable x to the value of variable y at the end of the period, if we are interested in testing the effect of y on x.
Posted by: Na Prática a Teoria é Outra | October 01, 2007 at 02:30 PM
CATO is enumerating the freedoms that multinational corporations want. Not real freedoms that individuals want, nor freedoms needed to grow economies.
Nor is CATO at all realistic in its measurements even of its own definitions of freedoms. The 'freest economies in the world' (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Asian_Economy/EG12Dk01.html) does a pretty good job of pointing this out.
Posted by: Mike Huben | October 01, 2007 at 07:52 PM
Ooops. Let's see if this link works.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Asian_Economy/EG12Dk01.html
Posted by: Mike Huben | October 01, 2007 at 07:54 PM
I just read the Ricardo Hausmann, Dani Rodrik paper about those who were left to hold the fort in El Salvador while the rest went elsewhere to produce. The paper is stuck in the old world realities not able to break out from traditional geographical borders since if you to El Salvador’s GNP add what the Salvadorians are earning gross abroad you might discover that El Salvador has been growing faster then China. And why should a Salvadorian working abroad be less Salvadorian than those that work in El Salvador?
What I find really interesting in the paper though is the paragraphs on the need for “Development mechanisms for higher risks finance” and I much commend them for touching on this issue. As a consultant who has walked the streets of a developing country for all my life trying to solve the financial needs and challenges of entrepreneurs I should take the occasion to point out that in my opinion the bank regulations coming out from Basle and that had only the purpose of avoiding bank crisis, effectively castrated the banks as financiers of development and forced them into perceived “low-risk” credits such as consumer financing. Now when bank regulators are being questioned this is a point I will take up during a meeting in the UN on finance for development by the end of October.
Posted by: Per Kurowski | October 01, 2007 at 08:37 PM
By the way one of the most amazing things for me is to see how the “Cato Institute and its libertarian fellow travelers” have been able to ignore how the financial flows in the world have actually been curtailed by Basle, almost as if unemployed Soviet central planners had taken refuge in Basle.
Who can understand how authorities that so much preach the value of the invisible hand of millions of market agents can then go out and delegate so much regulatory power to a limited number of human and very fallible credit-rating agencies, and which of course must be setting us up for the mother of all systemic errors?
Posted by: Per Kurowski | October 01, 2007 at 08:50 PM
Dani
Taking my standard Devil's Advocate position, I disagree with the interpretation of the data from the Cato report. Moreover, I found several aspects of the paper ("Discovering El Salvador's Production Potential") less than convincing.
RE: Blog Post
In the same vein as an earlier post, neither of these graphs are telling in and of themselves for a multitude of reasons.
1. Growth of GDP per capita is misleading. For instance, a 100% gain from $100 to $200 is less significant then going from $15,000 to $30,000. A more accurate picture would require some type of a normalized statistic based upon both the dollar amount and growth rate.
2. Using the EFW as a whole obfuscates the relative importance of each factor. In fact, in the Cato report, the authors state "we make no attempt to weight the components in any special way when deriving either area or summary ratings" (Chapter 1, page 12). I have often argued that property rights and corruption are of key importance. On these elements, El Salvador ranks lower.
3. Timing: I think Na Prática a Teoria é Outra captures the issue (comment above) quite well. It is debatable how a country’s current economic freedom level is related to a growth rate that looks back 15 years.
4. While I haven't seen the GDP data used to calculate the growth percents displayed in the second chart, most likely the lower quartiles are skewed by the fact that some of the poorest countries do not have adequate GDP data. This is only conjecture on my part, but I noted that this is an issue with UN GDP data for the same time period. (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cdb/cdb_series_xrxx.asp?series_code=29922).
Also unclear to me is whether or not the quartile number is an average of each country's annual growth rate or an average of the growth rate of the cumulative GDP per capita for all countries in that quartile.
5. I have plotted the 1970-2005 average 5-year score for "Legal Structure and Security of Property Rights" against 2005 GDP per Capita (PPP). I use this EFW stat as a proxy for corruption and assume a time lag between corruption and GDP per Capita (hence the average). The correlation is evident though admittedly correlation does not equal causation. Nonetheless, I think it is interesting.
No scaling: http://willfulblindness.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/gdp_pc.jpg
Log scaling: http://willfulblindness.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/gdp_pc_log.jpg
I am also in the process of analyzing and graphing several other data cuts and will post the results when I am finished.
(Note that some countries did not have EFW stats going back to 1970. In this case, I used the average of the years available).
RE: "Discovering El Salvador's Production Potential" (DPP) Paper
1. The DPP paper states that one of the larger issues facing El Salvador is a lack of investment/development in new lines of business. However, the paper only pays slight attention to the fact that foreign investment is limited by the El Salvador government in several sectors, including banking. Moreover, foreign investors must receive the government's approval for investments in railroads, piers, canals, public services and other public works. While I can't speak to the rigidity of the restrictions, given the need for increased infrastructure development in El Salvador, this is an unfortunate roadblock. (Source: Heritage Foundation, http://alca-ftaa.iadb.org/eng/invest/SLV~1.HTM).
2. The DPP paper claims that the exemption of maquilas from import duties on capital equipment, income taxes, municipal taxes, etc., is a form of government subsidy or intervention. In fact, this is a more extreme case of government NON-intervention. Only relative to continued government taxation of other businesses could this be considered a subsidy, and even that position is questionable.
It is twisted logic to argue that government "action" to withdraw from a certain business sector, and the beneficial results, supports government action to become _more_ active in other business activities. A more fitting conclusion overlooked by the DPP paper is the possibility that government withdrawal from more business activities may be beneficial to the economy.
3. On the first page of the DPP paper, a chart is shown for years 1960 - 2000 that depicts GDP per capita growth leveling off in 1998. However, GDP per capita adjusted for PPP in 1999 was $3,200 and in 2006 was $4,900, an annual increase of 6.3%.
Furthermore, the chart of GDP per capital (PPP) for 1999-2006 (http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=es&v=67) shows that there was continual growth until 2005 - the year El Salvador was hit by a hurricane that caused damages in excess of $300M or approximately 1% of GDP. However, GDP per capital in 2006 jumped back up to 2004, pre-hurricane levels.
4. Unemployment during this same time period went from 7.0% (1999) to 6.0% (2006) a 14% decrease. (Sources: http://unstats.un.org/ and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/es.html)
5. I find the argument that entrepreneurial activity in El Salvador is hampered by "competitive subsidizing" rather weak. Isn’t this often the case with innovation? For example, the software industry is notorious for the ability of competitors to quickly copy a successful product or service. However, Silicon Valley is arguable one of the most innovative economic regions in the U.S., if not the world (recognizing that there are other factors at play).
As has often been pointed out on this blog, there are cases in which such government incubation (for lack of a better word) has been successful. However, the risk of going down this path is great. It requires that the government avoid corruption and over-regulation through self-restraint in the form of laws and/or the creation of sound institutions. There are many cases in which governments have been unable to do so (Venezuela comes to mind). A crude corollary is that some gamblers win, and a few win big, but the majority lose. The most rational choice is not to gamble at all.
Posted by: Justin Rietz | October 01, 2007 at 09:33 PM
Additional note on the robustness of the Cato data:
Taking the bottom half of countries as ranked by 1990 GDP per Capita PPP (80 countries from the UN database), 15 are not covered by the Cato report. Of the remaining 65 countries, 15 did not have a "Legal Structure and Security of Property Rights" score in 1990, leaving only 50 countries., or less than 2/3 of the total.
Posted by: Justin Rietz | October 01, 2007 at 11:09 PM
Of course, the big problem lies in the phrase "Legal Structure and Security of Property Rights."
"Property rights," when used by libertarians, usually means the freedom to collect economic rents (in exchange, of course, for no contribution to production).
Economic reasoning, as well as historical examples, shows that government-granted titles to land (with no or low accompanying land taxes) _hinder_ economic growth, as well as being unjust.
Posted by: liberal | October 02, 2007 at 11:03 AM
I posted this comment on my blog (http://divisionoflabour.com/archives/004102.php):
Dani Rodrik takes notice of the Economic Freedom of the World report.
He is more favorable to us than I'd expected, but does criticize us for overselling the case,
El Salvador is a prime example of the "build-it-and-they-will-come" fallacy: all you need to do is to get the basics right, and then markets will do the rest.
This criticism may have some merit. I do tend to believe that if a group of people (e.g., a nation state) gets the institutions and policies consistent with some notion of economic freedom, then that group of people will grow and prosper economically. I don't believe this is a "day follows night" kind of thing however, and freely admit that some countries could do well for a time without a lot of economic freedom and some with a lot of economic freedom could do poorly. There are long and variable lags and other things matter.
But having said that I see El Salvador differently. First, I see a nation with a history of low economic freedom and political stability with little credibility in the eyes of domestic and foreign investors. It has only recently begun to stabilize and improve its economic institutions. I would not expect it to grow quickly immediately. These things take time. I would predict things to improve only after some degree of credibility is earned. In El Salvador's case, this could take a long time.
Second, maybe El S will never grow for some reason. Maybe the culture is messed up. Maybe the climate is a killer. Maybe God hates them. I don't know. Maybe El S will defy my world view that economic freedom leads to growth and prosperity. I doubt it (see the first point) but it could happen. Does this invalidate the general model? Sure a lot of examples like El Salvadors would force us to question the general model, but there are very few exceptions to the general rule that economic freedom and growth/prosperity are related.
Part of the problem is the construction of the one graph from our book that he cites. It relates the level of economic freedom with growth. We are careful in the book to qualify these graphs accordingly,
we are not necessarily arguing that there is a direct causal relation between economic freedom and the variables considered below. In other words, these graphics are no substitute for real scholarly investigation that controls for other factors. Nonetheless, we believe that the graphs provide some information about the contrast between the nature and characteristics of market-oriented economies and those of controlled economies. At the very least, these figures suggest potential fruitful areas for future research.
I wouldn't argue that the level of economic freedom alone correlates with growth. I would include the change in economic freedom and other variables too. Statistically, there is a lot of evidence that economic freedom, especially increases in economic freedom, is powerfully related to economic growth.
Outliers like El Salvador may exist but citing them is hardly evidence that an important general pattern doesn't exist.
Posted by: Bob Lawson | October 05, 2007 at 08:12 AM
Interesting data observations. Thanks!
Posted by: Bucket Trucks USA | February 05, 2010 at 09:43 AM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
http://www.watchvisa.com
http://www.watchvisa.com/breitling-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/cartier-watches.html
Posted by: rolex watches | February 25, 2010 at 09:59 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 25, 2010 at 11:50 PM
They should take up building BVLGARI Watches dams for power generation. We should FRANCK MULLER watches learn from china. They have the world's largest dam for power CHANEL Watches production, it alone produces 22,000 MW of LONGINES Watch power. So, unless the government opens up the economy more for iwc watches foreign investors, this power cut problem is a life long disease every hublot-watches india will need to face.
http://www.watchvisa.com/bvlgari-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/chanel-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/franck_muller-watches.html
Posted by: bvlgari watches | February 26, 2010 at 01:27 AM
How can people complain they lose a freedom, when a new law gives others more freedom? Like a law prohibiting?
outdoor smoking would give people who go outdoors the freedom to breath more fresh air and be healthier. Nonsmokers are the majority, so more people gain freedom than lose freedom.
Posted by: generic viagra | April 06, 2010 at 12:31 PM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 02:04 AM
How is constitutional regard and personal freedom a Conservative Principle?
One it comes down to it Cons and Libs seem to have similiar goals, but different recipes. How is constitutional regard considered a conservative ideology or that personal freedom is a conservative principle?
Posted by: buy sildenafil citrate | April 20, 2010 at 04:29 PM
ayer estube buscando acerca de este tema todo el dia. su blog me parece realmente interesante por lo que deseo felicitarle por toda la informacion y el trabajo que realizo en su blog. buen trabajo
Posted by: buy cialis | April 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM
i like this part of the post:"
My Photo
About
What I do
* Books
* MPA/ID program
The best development curriculum in the world
* Research papers
* Review of Economics and Statistics
* Short pieces
Me at work
*
Dani_rodrik
Recent Posts
* The Return of Industrial Policy
* Now for something really, really different
* The End of an Era in Finance
* The Robin Hood tax
* Avinash Dixit on Samuelson
* Explaining my absence
* Capitalism 3.0 -- the reviews are in
* The long view on the global economy
* The Madrassa myth
* How many growth diagnostics are there out there?
Recent Comments
* generic viagra online on No wrath like that of a free trader scorned
* cheap viagra on Sachs has advice for Zoellick
* kamagra on Soccer as a window on globalization
* kamagra on Soccer as a window on globalization
* buy cialis on Is there a growth payoff to economic freedom?
* Costa Rica 4 retirement on Reading between the lines: a stimulus consensus?
* test on Can you resist financial globalization?
* buy viagra on Amazon.com completes the product space
* generic viagra on Food prices and poverty
* tiffany jewelry on Globalization: we love it, we love it not...
This is what the WSJ thinks I look like...
*
Wsj_rodrik_march_28_2007
Search the blog
*
Google
WWW
rodrik.typepad.com
International economic news
*
Vestal! $87/Hr Job - 132 Openings...
Sponsored Link Tue Apr 27 2010 08:40:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
India's ruling party survives vote...
Sydney Morning Herald Tue Apr 27 2010 08:40:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Fed Boss: Trim Deficit or Economy Will Be Hurt...
New York Times Tue Apr 27 2010 08:14:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Indian diplomat held for 'spying'...
BBC Tue Apr 27 2010 06:06:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Sierra Leone launches free care...
BBC Tue Apr 27 2010 04:05:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Chaos marks Ukraine base debate...
Al Jazeera Tue Apr 27 2010 02:54:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Parties clash on family and crime...
BBC Tue Apr 27 2010 01:43:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Labour warn over rivals' 'cuts'...
BBC Mon Apr 26 2010 19:56:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Muslim says mistresses are the French way of life...
SINA Mon Apr 26 2010 19:34:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Election Ruling in Iraq Favors Prime Minister as Crisis Grows...
New York Times Mon Apr 26 2010 19:22:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Manuel Noriega sent to France for fresh trial...
Times Online Mon Apr 26 2010 17:35:00 GMT-0600 (CST)
Free Webfeeds from FeedDirect
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Archives
* April 2010
* March 2010
* February 2010
* December 2009
* September 2009
* June 2009
* May 2009
* April 2009
* March 2009
* February 2009
More...
« Food prices and poverty | Main | Bad books need to be trashed »
October 01, 2007
Is there a growth payoff to economic freedom?
The Cato Institute's 2007 annual report on Economic Freedom of the World has just been published. The report measures "economic freedom" based on the following:
* Size of Government: Expenditures, Taxes, and Enterprises
* Legal Structure and Security of Property Rights
* Access to Sound Money
* Freedom to Trade Internationally
* Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business.
The report is full of interesting data, but has to be handled with care. In fact, I look forward to the report every year because it gives me plenty of new evidence to play with (many of which run counter to the conclusions that the report's authors want to draw).
Here is a predictable chart, which shows that richer countries have more "economic freedom."
image
No surprise here.
And here is one that shows that the relationship between economic growth and Cato's index of economic freedom rates is--well, leaving out the basket cases (the bottom quartile), there is no determinate relationship.
image
How do we make sense of this?
I don't think we should be surprised. What the second picture reveals is the tremendous variance in economic performance among countries that pass a minimum threshold of market-orientedness. In these countries, the pursuit of ever freer markets is rarely the most appropriate government strategy. The binding constraint often lies elsewhere, and may involve more government rather than less.
A good example is El Salvador, a country that is second only to Chile in Cato's rankings of economic freedom in Latin America. (Please don't get me started on Chile's industrial policies again...) The Salvadoran economy is totally privatized, has free trade and free finance, and is dollarized. Yet it has languished in low-growth hell, and would have been in even worse dire straits if it did not receive a huge amount of remittances from Salvadorans in the U.S.
El Salvador is a prime example of the "build-it-and-they-will-come" fallacy: all you need to do is to get the basics right, and then markets will do the rest. (The analogy is Larry Summers'.)" is very good
Posted by: generic propicia | April 27, 2010 at 02:30 PM
this is a splendid post and I would give a five out of five rating to it. Need some more posts like this to be coming out Thank you and looking for more of this kind. http://www.brandnew-shoes.com/ women's sandals to you!
Posted by: nike shox shoes | May 04, 2010 at 02:57 AM
At present this season's jewelry!32143
Posted by: tiffany jewelry sale | May 05, 2010 at 08:57 PM
The good news, thank you!
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 16, 2010 at 06:55 AM
Let's say, for instance, that a country had high growth rates for most of the period, but then suffered a severe crisis, and decided to open its economy in the last year of the period. In the graph, its past growth, which happened before market-friendly reforms, would be compared to a level of liberalization that only reached its present level at the last years of the period in question.
Posted by: who called me | June 09, 2010 at 02:07 AM
How can people complain they lose a freedom, when a new law gives others more freedom? Like a law prohibiting?
Posted by: viagra work | June 20, 2010 at 09:10 AM
Hi, i'm really interested in this post...I want to know more about "Is there a growth payoff to economic freedom?".
Thats exactly what I was searching in this time...
Thanks!!!
Posted by: home for sale costa rica | June 28, 2010 at 09:07 PM
Wow what a great blog this is! Some quality articles I don't see every day!
Posted by: Air Jordan 11 | June 29, 2010 at 03:32 AM
!~@~@~@~@~~~~~Interesting theory - but it would be worthwhile expanding the effects of high oil prices in the neighbouring countries. Venezuela for one has fascinating internal eonomic and social issues with or without high oil prices - though the higher they go, the more extreme they go. Unless they have reached the point of no return where strife caused by lower oil prices equals oil financed strife.
Posted by: 4 week cna classes | July 20, 2010 at 03:55 AM
wonder how foreign competition in sectors where US domestic production is very little would create a ripple effect throughout the economy. What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery industry. Let's get real. Have the academic salaries (especially in
http://www.toplvstore.com/louis-vuitton-zippy-coin-purse-m91535-p-644.html
http://www.louisvuitton4love.com/
http://www.toplvstore.com/louis-vuitton-damier-azur-canvas-speedy-30-n41533-p-404.html
12231
Posted by: lv store | August 15, 2010 at 09:32 AM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. Came across your blog when I was searching bing I have found the bit of info that
I found to be quite useful.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 09:53 PM
I think this is a great post. One thing that I find the most helpful is number five. Sometimes when I write, I just let the flow of the words and information come out so much that I loose the purpose. It’s only after editing when I realize what I’ve done. There’s defiantly a lot of great tips here I’m going to try to be more aware of.
Posted by: air jordans for sale | August 23, 2010 at 03:25 AM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 10:56 PM
Hi, i'm really interested in this post...I want to know more about "Is there a growth payoff to economic freedom?".
Posted by: VRS | September 02, 2010 at 02:58 AM
The complexity that diabetes brings to all relationships is unquestionable. That it brings it to our marriages and partnerships poses deeper challenges. The guilt I feel for example, for burdening my husband with my limitations, my fatigue after a night of lows, my frustration with the world after a week of highs. None of that is his fault yet I'd be lying if I said that it doesn't slop over onto him at times.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | September 13, 2010 at 02:01 PM
The first stage Wedding Dresses of spring wedding will give you so many things to plan and organize. Taking some time first to think and jot down some initial wedding ideas or Evening Gowns themes is really important before referring to any wedding vendors or Evening Dresses
venues. In this way, you will be able to easily conceptualize the perfect touches Quinceanera Dresses for your spring wedding day.As we all know, spring is the mark of time of birth and renewal. Having your wedding in this beautiful season can bestow a marriage life full of excitement and adventure.
Posted by: weddingdresses | September 15, 2010 at 09:30 PM
The first stage Wedding Dresses of spring wedding will give you so many things to plan and organize. Taking some time first to think and jot down some initial wedding ideas or Evening Gowns themes is really important before referring to any wedding vendors or Evening Dresses
venues. In this way, you will be able to easily conceptualize the perfect touches Quinceanera Dresses for your spring wedding day.As we all know, spring is the mark of time of birth and renewal. Having your wedding in this beautiful season can bestow a marriage life full of excitement and adventure.
Posted by: weddingdresses | September 15, 2010 at 09:38 PM
I think it is gread. That is the main motivating factor in what all people do. Criminals just are willing to go farther to get their money than the rest.
Posted by: moncler | September 19, 2010 at 11:04 PM
Hello, thanks for yor give me so good articl ,this article give me many new ideas, make me achieve a breakthrough .I hope you go on writing articl ,thus you can help more people like me. I will give you good evaluation all the time .
Posted by: pandora jewelry | October 23, 2010 at 02:14 AM
Es ist wirklich eine sehr gute Website, um eine lange Zeit zu finden, sollten Sie bei Sammlungen sehen
Posted by: thomas sabo 2010 | October 28, 2010 at 09:25 PM
I want to know more about "Is there a growth payoff to economic freedom?".
http://karaokesongs.tradebit.com/>karaoke songs
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 11, 2010 at 01:49 AM
i think this post is very nice have a look at this...
Research Paper Writing
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 29, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Hi Dani !
this post is very Informative
i like this post
thanks for sharing info,
Custom Writing Essays
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 08, 2011 at 06:13 AM
raf
Thanks a lot for sharing.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 21, 2011 at 09:59 AM
These kind of post are always inspiring and I prefer to read quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post
http://www.bestpenisproducts.com
Posted by: Account Deleted | February 21, 2011 at 03:01 PM
Nice article, great!I like it, thanks for sharing it with us. its worth reading!
Sell House |
Wholesale Real Estate
Posted by: renl | March 25, 2011 at 05:45 PM
Is there a growth payoff to economic freedom article is wounderfull article...
Wholesale active hoodies | Wholesale active pants
information. Keep sharing the good work in future too. :) :)
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 04, 2011 at 05:50 AM
Oooh Yeah !! This is really amazing blog. Your graphical description as well as the content is simply superb. You are my inspiration.
Forex brokers review
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 31, 2011 at 11:48 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks for this ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 07, 2011 at 10:13 AM
Holy shit.
Comprar computadoras
Posted by: Android Tablet | June 16, 2011 at 02:25 PM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 20, 2011 at 04:32 PM
Hey great stuff, thank you for sharing this useful information and i will let know my friends as well.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 10, 2011 at 03:29 PM
recovery powerpoint file
Thanks for the interesting article!
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 28, 2012 at 03:54 AM
I think it is gread. That is the main motivating factor in what all people do.....
Essay Paper Writing
Posted by: Account Deleted | August 03, 2012 at 10:34 AM
when all his neighbours are willing to accept of them, is a manifest violation of that natural liberty which it is the proper business of law not to infringe, but to support. Business Listings
Posted by: Tom Watson | January 24, 2013 at 06:12 AM
Your post gives useful and sensible information for someone who is thinking of venturing into home based business enterprise.thanks for your great work Click here
Posted by: Tom Watson | January 24, 2013 at 06:15 AM