That is the monumental task that Doug North, John Wallis, and Barry Weingast have taken on in their forthcoming book "A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Human History." The book is being discussed today and tomorrow at the Encounters with Authors series of Harvard's Institute for Quantitative Social Science.
The book's focus is on two fundamental modes of social organization, which the authors call the Natural State and the Open-Access Order. The first of these appeared about 10,000 years ago and characterizes not only most of recorded human history, but also most of today's countries. It is a system where a small group of elites--the authors emphasize that the multiplicity of elites is important--reach a modus vivendi whereby they agree to create and distribute rents among themselves.
Only about 25 countries and 15 percent of the world's population live in open-access societies, according to the authors. Open-access orders are based on competition--both in economics and in politics--and use the threat of entry to regulate social, economic, and political relations.
The authors emphasize that much of social science today goes astray because it tries to fit all countries under the same theoretical construct. Instead, they argue, you must understand that the logic of these two systems are fundamentally different.
I am not quite through with the manuscript, but what I am missing in the book so far (and what the first six chapters do not seem to contain--there is a seventh chapter which I have not seen) is a good discussion of what this framework explains that other theories do not--especially as regards current political and economic developments. In other words, why did we really need this book and its conceptual framework?
I am also uncertain about the validity of the sharp distinction that North et al. draw between their two modes of social order insofar as we are meant to apply this distinction to contemporary realities. I know that most developing societies have features that are different from those in the advanced democracies, but I am not sure I see a fundamentally different way of organizing society (instead of gradations). Their historical argument has also come in for a bit of criticism, notably by Niall Ferguson in his discussion of North et al.'s chapter on the evolution of property rights in medieval and early modern England.
What the authors do get right, I think, is that otherwise similar institutional arrangements will induce different behaviors and outcomes in different social orders. Doug North has been making this point for quite a while, and it is an especially important one to keep in mind in light of the current obsession with governance reforms and best-practices.
Sounds like Toynbee with a bit of economism added in.
Posted by: gordon | October 03, 2007 at 09:26 PM
Dani --
What is not clear from your post is whether North et al. think there is a continuum between the Natural State and the Open-Access Order? I would like to express some reservations about this work assuming the authors posit the presence of acontinuum (the very name "natural state" implies there is a continuum).
There is nothing new about this theory. Actually, this theory sounds a bit like the Modernization Theory (MT) of yesteryears. Remember, MT posited that with the increase in communication, rural-urban migration etc. all socities would eventually end up being identical to Western-style liberal democracies -- the MT was teleological. Alas, it wasn't to be!
However, I do agree with North et. al when they argue that the present academic research goes astry when it tries to fit all cases to the available theoretical construct.
One instance of this is the complete inability of Western Social Science in explaining the incidence of Suicide Bombing. If we are to assume -- what most theories now assume, especially with the ascendence of Rational Choice Theory (RCT)in Social Science --the presence of homo economicus then Suicide Bombing is not explained, at all. Why would I want to decrease my overall utility (by killing myself) for a miniscual dent in my enemy's utility?
Similarly, the presence of altrusitic behavior, the practice of donating organs and so forth is not easily explained by RCT.
Similarly, where some things can be explained by the RCT, they are often judged differently. Western theories place way too much importance on the "substantive" importance of democracy for the citizens of a country. They seem to forget that sustinance is the most important concern for the vast majority of individuals.
Why is it, for instance, that Indian Hindus, coming from the biggest democracy in the world, would pay a large sum of money to go to the Arab Gulf countries, especially Saudi Arabia: a country where Indian Hindus have no political or religious freedom?
Posted by: Aqdas Afzal (Pakistan) | October 04, 2007 at 04:40 AM
If institutions are relative to the societies in which they function then rational choice would also be relative to the society in which it functions.
Posted by: wjd123 | October 04, 2007 at 10:26 PM
hello fellas, I just want to emphasize the good work on this blog, has excellent views and a clear vision of what you are looking for.
Posted by: viagra online | November 16, 2009 at 09:27 AM
How can people complain they lose a freedom, when a new law gives others more freedom? Like a law prohibiting?
outdoor smoking would give people who go outdoors the freedom to breath more fresh air and be healthier. Nonsmokers are the majority, so more people gain freedom than lose freedom.
Posted by: generic viagra | April 06, 2010 at 12:25 PM
.Thank you ! You did a good post !
MBTIt turns out to be so popular to everyone not only due to it’s best quality,but also it can provide you more choices before you buy itmbt shoes.MBT hope to help people all over the world have a more healthy, active and happy life.
Posted by: mbt shoes | April 07, 2010 at 01:09 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 20, 2010 at 02:41 AM
How is constitutional regard and personal freedom a Conservative Principle?
One it comes down to it Cons and Libs seem to have similiar goals, but different recipes. How is constitutional regard considered a conservative ideology or that personal freedom is a conservative principle?
Posted by: buy sildenafil citrate | April 20, 2010 at 04:27 PM
I?d like to know what are the histories of the interest rates of the
major currencies such USD, GBP, EUR, AUD, NZD, JPY for at least two
years. For example, the USD was 4.25 then 4.00 then 4.25, then 4.50 ?
etc.
Posted by: stress reduction | April 27, 2010 at 02:58 PM
wonder how foreign competition in sectors where US domestic production is very little would create a ripple effect throughout the economy. What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery industry. Let's get real. Have the academic salaries (especially in
http://www.toplvstore.com/louis-vuitton-zippy-coin-purse-m91535-p-644.html
http://www.louisvuitton4love.com/
http://www.toplvstore.com/louis-vuitton-damier-azur-canvas-speedy-30-n41533-p-404.html
99
Posted by: lv store | August 15, 2010 at 09:30 AM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it. Came across your blog when I was searching bing I have found the bit of info that
I found to be quite useful.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 20, 2010 at 10:22 PM
We have many theories of people history but no one can prove this.
Posted by: cheap meridia | August 30, 2010 at 10:29 AM
I was searching for books that we could donate to our local school
Posted by: who is calling me | September 08, 2010 at 06:07 AM
raf
Thanks a lot.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 21, 2011 at 09:43 AM
These kind of post are always inspiring and I prefer to read quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post
http://www.bestpenisproducts.com
Posted by: Account Deleted | February 21, 2011 at 03:17 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 31, 2011 at 04:12 AM
Raf Sistemleri
raf
Good Work !!! Old man ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 31, 2011 at 10:19 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 20, 2011 at 04:30 PM