Here is a fascinating graph from a new paper by my colleague Robert Lawrence. It compares trends in average productivity and real hourly wages between 1982 and 2006 in the U.S.
To say that wages have not kept up with productivity is an understatement.
Why this gap? Lawrence shows that some of it is a statistical mirage: actual labor compensation (which includes benefits) has risen more rapidly than wages; and the CPI which deflates the wage series has similarly risen more rapidly than the prices of the goods that workers produce (which is an interesting bit of empirical evidence relevant to an earlier debate in this blog). These two adjustments explain 60 percent of the gap. The rest has to do with rising inequality.
Lawrence also identifies an interesting change in the nature of the inequality over time. In the 1980s and to some extent the 1990s the driving force behind inequality was the inequality in the structure of wages, and the rise in the skill premium in particular. But more recently the skill premium has stopped increasing. The story since 2000 is essentially a shift in income from labor to capital.
Could globalization be behind these trends? Lawrence doubts it. While he is willing to attribute some of the rising wage inequality of the 1980s to trade with developing countries, the timing of the increase in profits since 2000 does not seem to fit very neatly with any globalization-related story. He prefers a cyclical interpretation, suggesting that the rise in profit shares will be reversed.
UPDATE: The link to the paper has been corrected. Thanks to Eric de Souza.
Dani,
I saw an interesting argument (sorry cannot remember the source) that increases in household sector debt inevitably increase profit, since household expenditure is income for the corporate sector, and household income is an expense. Any comment - it could be relevant here, since presumably the credit cycle will reverse at some stage.
Posted by: reason | June 12, 2007 at 04:01 AM
sorry i have one question:what is inequality in the structure of wages?
Posted by: mohammadreza | June 12, 2007 at 07:27 AM
Does the share of profits have to go down? Perhaps now capital is more important to production.
This was also something that struck me about your "Democracies Pay Higher Wages" paper. Could it be that democracies, for whatever reason, encourage industries where labor is more important and so has a higher share of returns to output?
Posted by: a student | June 12, 2007 at 07:48 AM
Domestic policy and regulation can affect wage inequality fairly directly, yes? If only I could think of some major political/idealogical shift in domestic corporate policy that would fit this timeline....
Posted by: Ktwdawg | June 12, 2007 at 08:07 AM
Also, what are the units? I can't read them and I can't find the paper to check. Are we talking about a big increase in productivity here?
Posted by: a student | June 12, 2007 at 08:10 AM
Can you provide the cite to the Lawrence paper that this graph appears in?
Posted by: -Lurker | June 12, 2007 at 08:22 AM
'The story since 2000 is essentially a shift in income from labor to capital.'
And from blue-collar workers to executives.
Posted by: Ivo Staub | June 12, 2007 at 09:16 AM
In yesterday's Independent, Stephen King (the best business commentator in the world!) writes:
"Those who own capital have good reason to be happy. Those in the West who can only offer labour - particularly those with relatively low skills - will sometimes feel only despondency." But he warns that a protectionist response from the West would be a tragedy.
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/comment/article2643120.ece
Posted by: Joe | June 12, 2007 at 09:30 AM
"Average" wages tell us nothing about the distribution.
I have no doubt average wages are up, I have no doubt the distribution is skewing to the top 20%.
Posted by: save_the_rustbelt | June 12, 2007 at 10:08 AM
My colleagues have been documenting this for years (http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/).
Nice to know it's official now.
Posted by: Miracle Max | June 12, 2007 at 11:12 AM
The link to the paper is wrong. The correct link is:
http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~RLawrence/Lawrencefor%20Brandeis.pdf
Posted by: Eric de Souza | June 12, 2007 at 01:22 PM
Sorry, I should have been more precise. The link to the paper on Robert Lawrence's publications page is wrong. Your link sends one to his publications page. Clicking on the link there gives an error message.
Posted by: Eric de Souza | June 12, 2007 at 01:41 PM
Dr. Rodrik -- Any chance you could spell out why Dr. Lawrence thinks the timing of the post 2000 increase in profits doesn't fit well with a globalization-related story. It certainly seems to match the strong acceleration in Chinese export growth which took Chinese exports from $200-250b a year to close to $1 trillion last yuear and likely over $1.2 trillion this year. But that is a very rough correlation -- I would be very interested in hearing a bit more of the thinking behind Dr. Lawrence's argument (about the timing not fitting well)
Posted by: brad setser | June 13, 2007 at 12:02 AM
Brad Setzer is correct. The timing of the increased profit share fits with the emergence of China and it could be that there has been a permanent increase. Indeed one reason corporate profits are so high is that real interest rates are low and this could reflect Chinese savings behavior. But there are also considerations that suggest that the low labor share in income is cyclical. First, the current share of labor is the same as it was in 1997 at a similar stage of the expansion. Second I would have expected the China effects to be evident particularly in manufacturing -- but the change in labor share is the same as in services. Third, why did earlier globalization not have the effect on labor share? Is China really all that different? My position is therefore that we will need to wait till the expansion runs its course before we can sure.
Posted by: Robert Lawrence | June 13, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Could unabated mass immigration combined with an economic slowdown, be related to rising income inequality since 2000? I know this is heresy for the Open Borders crowd. But take a look at the following from Andrew Sum of Northeastern University
The Impact of New Immigrants on Young Native-Born Workers, 2000-2005
http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back806.html
Over the 2000-2005 period, immigration levels remained very high and roughly half of new immigrant workers were illegal. This report finds that the arrival of new immigrants (legal and illegal) in a state results in a decline in employment among young native-born workers in that state. Our findings indicate that young native-born workers are being displaced in the labor market by the arrival of new immigrants.
Between 2000 and 2005, 4.1 million immigrant workers arrived from abroad, accounting for 86 percent of the net increase in the total number of employed persons (16 and older), the highest share ever recorded in the United States.
Of the 4.1 million new immigrant workers, between 1.4 and 2.7 million are estimated to be illegal immigrants. This means that illegal immigrants accounted for up to 56 percent of the net increase in civilian employment in the United States over the past five years.
Between 2000 and 2005, the number of young (16 to 34) native-born men who were employed declined by 1.7 million; at the same time, the number of new male immigrant workers increased by 1.9 million.
Multivariate statistical analyses show that the probability of teens and young adults (20-24) being employed was negatively affected by the number of new immigrant workers (legal and illegal) in their state.
The negative impacts tended to be larger for younger workers, for in-school youth compared to out-of-school youth, and for native-born black and Hispanic males compared to their white counterparts.
It appears that employers are substituting new immigrant workers for young native-born workers. The estimated sizes of these displacement effects were frequently quite large.
The increased hiring of new immigrant workers also has been accompanied by important changes in the structure of labor markets and employer-employee relationships. Fewer new workers, especially private-sector wage and salary workers, are ending up on the formal payrolls of employers, where they would be covered by unemployment insurance, health insurance, and worker protections.
Posted by: Peter Schaeffer | June 16, 2007 at 10:54 AM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
http://www.watchvisa.com
http://www.watchvisa.com/breitling-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/cartier-watches.html
Posted by: rolex watches | February 25, 2010 at 10:29 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 12:44 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 08:46 PM
At present this season's jewelry,but nowadays one of personal adornment first!
Posted by: tiffany jewelry | April 27, 2010 at 03:40 AM
The good news, thank you!
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 16, 2010 at 07:16 AM
Late to class...
Ok, so the economics seem as convincing as economics can be, but when you move your argument into real-world politics, as you must, you soon realize that to simply argue the cost-benefit analysis is not enough. For starters, I would wager that a great deal of Americans are Huge Jerks, at least as far as welfare nationalism is concerned. I would also be willing to bet that if you were to run a similar calculation on the cost/benefit ratio of lives lost to security gained in the Iraq war, you would find out just how much Americans care about foreigners, or foreign affairs whatsoever.
Posted by: vibram five fingers | May 28, 2010 at 12:45 PM
this is something i have been very interested in lately. thanks.
Posted by: replica handbags | May 29, 2010 at 02:27 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 10:32 AM
I am a senior student too, I Love this post as i love study english, This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content, refueling
Posted by: Moncler | August 15, 2010 at 10:15 AM
I am a senior student too, I Love this post as i love study english, This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content, refueling
Posted by: mbt shoes | August 18, 2010 at 09:37 AM
I think this is a great post. One thing that I find the most helpful is number five. Sometimes when I write, I just let the flow of the words and information come out so much that I loose the purpose. It’s only after editing when I realize what I’ve done. There’s defiantly a lot of great tips here I’m going to try to be more aware of.
Posted by: jordan shoes for sale | August 22, 2010 at 11:28 PM
I think this is a great post. One thing that I find the most helpful is number five. Sometimes when I write, I just let the flow of the words and information come out so much that I loose the purpose. It’s only after editing when I realize what I’ve done. There’s defiantly a lot of great tips here I’m going to try to be more aware of.
Posted by: authentic jordans | August 23, 2010 at 01:54 AM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 09:26 PM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 10:05 PM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people
Posted by: Moncler | August 27, 2010 at 05:15 AM
We have been banned and have a considerable amount of money owed to us.
http://www.anfworld.com/abercrombie-and-fitch-jeans.html
http://www.anfworld.com/ruehl-no-925.html
Posted by: nike | September 02, 2010 at 01:47 AM
Are we talking about a big increase in productivity
Posted by: فيس بوك | September 30, 2010 at 01:30 PM
this is very clear and readable for anyone
Posted by: الايفون | October 03, 2010 at 04:55 PM
Thanks for this post. You know, I'd really appreciate a post where you suggested news sources that you consider good ones.
Posted by: gucci outlet | October 04, 2010 at 09:47 AM
The people who get on in this world are the people who get up and look for circumstances they want , and if they cannot find them .they make them.
Posted by: new balance | October 15, 2010 at 02:04 AM
Thank you for sharing to us.
Please one more post about that..
Posted by: Finpecia | November 16, 2010 at 02:45 AM
raf
Thanks for article.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 22, 2011 at 05:12 PM
Wow, nice post,there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post
Generic Viagra
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 05, 2011 at 08:00 AM
Great information, you have a wonderful blog and an excellent article!!
Regards,
Generic Viagra
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 06, 2011 at 04:34 AM
Hola,
Realmente buen trabajo, hay muchas personas en busca de eso ahora van a encontrar suficientes fuentes por tus consejos.
También se espera para más consejos acerca de que,
Regards, メファキン
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 09, 2011 at 05:45 AM
Thanks, great share.I need this article to complete my assignment in the college, and it has same topic with your article.
Generic Viagra
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 11, 2011 at 07:19 AM
I am so excited that I have found this your post because I have been searching for some information about it almost three hours. You helped me a lot indeed and reading this your article I have found many new and useful information about this subject
Buy Famvir
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 14, 2011 at 06:56 AM
Hie primum ipsum visitabo hic. Ita multi inveni in vasa interesting maxime Weblog eius discussionem. Tons de tuis commentationes articles, suspicor non sum solus omnem habens fructum praesens est! sustine bonos vsus.
Regards,
Ports Automation
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 25, 2011 at 05:11 AM
Skönt att vara besöka din blogg igen, har det varit månader för mig. Väl här artikeln som jag har väntat så länge. Jag behöver den här artikeln för att slutföra mitt uppdrag i kollegiet, och den har samma tema med din artikel. Tack, bra aktie.
Generic Soft Tabs |
http://www.bellspharmacy.com/maincategory/9/generic-soft-tabs.html
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 13, 2011 at 08:16 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 31, 2011 at 04:12 AM
Raf Sistemleri
raf
Good Work !!! Old man ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 31, 2011 at 10:18 AM
I have wanted to learn more about particular topics, but not many websites would help me out in informing me the way I expected. This left me with many question, but after reading your article, I got an answer to all my questions. You are too cool dude!!!
Regards,
Generic Drugs Exporter
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 21, 2011 at 07:12 AM
Wow, nice post,
there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post
http://www.onlinemedicalstore.net/allergy-lioresal-baclofen-c-1_26
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 23, 2011 at 03:24 AM
. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.
http://www.bellspharmacy.com/category/36/penegra.html
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 24, 2011 at 02:50 AM
I need this article to complete my assignment in the college, and it has same topic with your article. Thanks, great share.
http://www.bellspharmacy.com/maincategory/9/generic-soft-tabs.html
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 25, 2011 at 02:28 AM
Wow, nice post,there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post
http://www.onlinemedicalstore.net/allergy-allegra-fexofenadine-c-1_10
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 27, 2011 at 03:18 AM
I wonder how you got so good. This is really a fascinating blog, lots of stuff that I can get into. One thing I just want to say is that your Blog is so perfect!
http://www.buymedicinesonline.us/lamictal-11-112.html
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 27, 2011 at 06:17 AM
Thank you for sharing to us Please one more post about that..
http://www.onlinemedicalstore.net/allergy-allegra-fexofenadine-c-1_10
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 29, 2011 at 04:19 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 20, 2011 at 08:50 AM
Nice discussion is going on there I like it so much keep on asking and learning new things…
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 14, 2011 at 10:38 AM
Common sense is the most evenly distributed quantity in the world. Everyone thinks he has enough.
All people have the right to stupidity but some abuse the privilege.
Tera gold Tera online gold
Posted by: girlslovefashion | November 21, 2011 at 02:27 AM
Awesome, Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing. Enjoy to read your write . Thanks a lot
Creating History Together With ArenaBetting Piala Eropa 2012 http://seotoolinfo.com/2012/06/creating-history-creating-history-together-with-arenabetting-piala-eropa-2012/
Agenliga Sebagai Agen Bola Online Untuk Euro 2012 http://seotoolinfo.com/2012/06/agenliga-agenliga-com-sebagai-agen-bola-online-untuk-euro-2012/
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 30, 2012 at 01:26 PM
Bank Mandiri Bank Terbaik di Indonesia
Bank Mandiri Bank Terbaik di Indonesia
Promo Bonus 100% Sbobet, Ibcbet dan Casino Online Dalam Rangka HUT BAVETLINE Yang Kedua
Masterbet88 Grand Opening Promo Bonus 50% Sportsbook dan Casino Online
Posted by: Rastia Rigie | January 15, 2013 at 03:13 AM