Yes, according to FT's Alan Beattie. He writes in today's FT:
Being a developing country used to be easy. You followed leaders - Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea - up a well-trodden ladder from agriculture through manufacturing to services. Starting with tilling the soil, you moved on to turning out T-shirts, then toys, then tractors, then television sets, and ended up trading Treasuries.
The rise of China has made that less straightforward. Not only is the first rung harder to reach, thanks to the hundreds of millions of rural migrants to Chinese cities still willing to work for low wages stitching garments, but also exports of goods from China's coastal industrial fringe are rapidly becoming more sophisticated, threatening those halfway or more up the ladder. While the shoemakers of Italy and the steelmakers of Pennsylvania may complain loudly about Chinese competition, those with more to worry about are middle-income Asian countries geographically and economically close to the Middle Kingdom.
So what is a poor developing nation to do? There are two schools on thought on this, as Beattie notes. One thinks that government cannot possibly do much and they better get out of the way, after taking care of the usual list of fundamentals of course:
For countries such as the Philippines, without a big arsenal for public investment, policy recommendations from most business people for competing with China involve no magic elixir. Governments should improve logistics, infrastructure, the business climate and education; try, possibly, to spot specialities emerging and support them, but otherwise get out of the way. They warn against governments crashing into the market having decided what the economy is likely to be good at and then promoting it at all costs.
The other school (which includes me) thinks that by following this route you not only remain in a rut, but you also miss out on the most important lesson from China's success: the need for the government to be strategic (and yes also flexible) in supporting industries. Yo do need an industrial policy--but of this kind, not of the traditional type.
Alan Beattie, the author of this FT article, is usually reliable. Not here, though.
(1) My first gripe is with this statement:
"Remittances form more than 10 per cent of gross domestic product, the highest ratio in the world."
This is flat wrong. The Philippines is not even among the top twenty countries in this respect according to the World Bank publication "Remittances: Development Impact and Future Prospects".
(2) More trouble in store:
"Being a developing country used to be easy. You followed leaders - Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea - up a well-trodden ladder from agriculture through manufacturing to services. Starting with tilling the soil, you moved on to turning out T-shirts, then toys, then tractors, then television sets, and ended up trading Treasuries."
One word: India. India is taking advantage of its large, educated workforce fluent in English to offer more services and thus avoid direct competition with China. Given India's less well-developed transportation infrastructure, this makes sense. Like India, the Philippines has a large, educated workforce fluent in English that is suitable for a service economy.
Beattie's mistake is in assuming there is "one best way" to development. I have written more about this article here:
http://ipezone.blogspot.com/2007/06/ft-gets-philippines-wrong-bigtime.html
Dr. Rodrik: Please enable formatting for us commenters so we can italicize text, make links, etc. I think you need to fiddle with your Typepad settings a bit to get this done. Thanks!
Posted by: Emmanuel | June 14, 2007 at 05:35 PM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
http://www.watchvisa.com
http://www.watchvisa.com/breitling-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/cartier-watches.html
Posted by: rolex watches | February 25, 2010 at 10:33 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 12:45 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 09:29 PM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 11:40 PM
I am a senior student too, I Love this post as i love study english, This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content, refueling
Posted by: mbt shoes | August 18, 2010 at 09:32 AM
Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing.
Posted by: authentic jordans | August 23, 2010 at 10:54 PM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 10:29 PM
Thank you for some very useful info. I will be sure to read more here!, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource
Posted by: Moncler | August 27, 2010 at 05:13 AM
raf
Thanks a lot for sharing.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 22, 2011 at 05:05 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 01, 2011 at 03:40 AM
Raf
raf
Good Job ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 08, 2011 at 04:23 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 20, 2011 at 08:48 AM