Frank Levy chides me for overlooking today's page 1 story in the WSJ on globalization. It's called "Globalization's Gains Come with a Price," and it's all about how the wage distribution has gotten wider in developing countries, contrary to what a lot of people were expecting. When I read it, my first reaction was, "this is news?" Frank assures me that it is to most WSJ readers.
How is this different from "a race to the bottom"?
Posted by: dissent | May 25, 2007 at 02:07 AM
Or, more importantly, how is it worse than the situation without trade?
Posted by: conchis | May 25, 2007 at 05:18 AM
It's a good newspaper story but I would not say the same of the data presented in the charts alongside.
Inequality in Mexico surely did not decline after NAFTA. The peso crisis of 1995, and inequality falls? I don't think so. Currency crises hit the real incomes of the poor (food prices go up) but not the real incomes of exporters (the peso value of exports just rises). The effect on inequality is large, easily measured and incontrovertible. Why it's absent from the World Bank data is a mystery.
As for the interesting figure on Korea, it clearly shows the pitfall of *financial* liberalization, which led to the Asian crisis. The debacle of 1997 had nothing to do with trade.
JG
Posted by: James Galbraith | May 25, 2007 at 09:29 AM
I am almost 100% sure most WSJ readers would be surprised to hear this. A very smart WSJ reporter once told me that their masthead should read "All the news that fits our views".
Everyone I know who has worked with them agrees. They are the business lobby's "Pravda".
Posted by: Anamolous | May 25, 2007 at 01:32 PM
It isn't news, but it certainly does call into question mainstream economic theory about how trade liberalization was supposed to decrease inequality between the skilled and the unskilled in the developing world. Unfortunately, the economists who peddled those arguments have never really been taken to task.
Posted by: Justin | May 27, 2007 at 04:35 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 09:10 PM
What is the mean of
"a race to the bottom"?
Posted by: pizza | August 05, 2010 at 10:37 AM
I am a senior student too, I Love this post as i love study english, This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content.
Posted by: mbt shoes | August 18, 2010 at 10:02 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people
Posted by: Moncler | August 27, 2010 at 05:21 AM
raf
Thanks a lot for sharing.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 23, 2011 at 11:57 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 01, 2011 at 03:22 AM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:16 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it
sexyshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:16 PM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier
sexshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:17 PM
These stories are very common, so I am not looking too much into this. I usually follow what this blogs say, as that helps me most. I don’t have to take much stress or tension because of OctaFX broker, as they also helps a lot especially with the huge cash back facility where I get 15 dollars from just one lot size trade, it helps me so much more to perform at my best without having to take much fear at all.
Posted by: DjNasir | January 07, 2016 at 05:08 PM