... here at the Center for Global Development website. The CGD list of candidates is composed of Montek Ahluwahlia, Tony Blair, Kemal Dervis, Stanley Fischer, Robert Kimmitt, Richard Levin, Trevor Manuel, Robert Rubin, Ernesto Zedillo, and Robert Zoellick. Only five of these are American citizens.
My first wish is not to have any of the IMF people into such institute. IMF has never had a good track of record and they did little to change that or their effort didn't materialize evenif they did. Again I have the same nominated the same person, PM Toney Blair for two main reasons:
1. His comittment to reduce global poverty
2. His comittment to reduce climate change
Posted by: Torben | May 22, 2007 at 03:01 PM
Write in candidate: Martin Wolf
Posted by: Justin Rietz | May 22, 2007 at 03:14 PM
No Ernesto Zedillo anywhere to be found... a little slip, there?
Posted by: Santiago Dawson | May 22, 2007 at 03:18 PM
I vote for Angelina Jolie ;-)
Posted by: Zvonimir Vanjak | May 22, 2007 at 04:31 PM
Rather Jolie than Jeffrey Sachs ;-)
Posted by: Justin Rietz | May 22, 2007 at 05:15 PM
The Center for Global Development forgot to give us the "none of the above" option.
Actually, another Bush stooge (like Zoellick) would be fine by me. I want whatever does the most damage to the Bank's image. Wolfowitz was probably a blessing in disguise.
The bottom line is that any international institution in which the rich countries exercise diproportionate voting power is never going to reflect the interests of developing countries.
Posted by: Justin Delacour | May 23, 2007 at 03:05 AM
Actually if you take the survey, you will discover that there is a "none of the above" option in the sense that you can write in your own candidate and skip rating any candidates that you don't want to comment on.
Posted by: larae | May 23, 2007 at 10:52 AM
In my opinion, one can not be quantified, but it is important, trade, free or otherwise. Thanks!
Posted by: dunk shoes | March 28, 2010 at 10:23 PM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 09:14 PM
I am a senior student too, I Love this post as i love study english, This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content.
Posted by: mbt shoes | August 18, 2010 at 10:04 AM
raf
Thanks so much.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 23, 2011 at 12:13 PM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier
sexshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:11 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it
sexyshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:12 PM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:12 PM
Vote is very crucial for us, as we should always raise our voice and make sure we support the right person, if we don’t support the right guy then we are definitely making mistake and that will trouble us in future. Our generation should always be eager to bring change, as that’s the only way future will be better and economy will grow. I am a trader, I love to make harsh decision, it is easier for me to do with support of OctaFX broker, so my life gets easier with them.
Posted by: DjNasir | January 12, 2016 at 07:31 AM