I don't know, but I certainly am not. However, this is different from believing that corruption is the most serious problem facing developing countries. Many development newbies suffer from the corruption obsession, the view that anti-corruption policies ("governance reform") is the most direct route to achieving growth and equity. Wolfowitz exhibited severe symptoms of this, and much of the commentary around his departure has been marked by a similar misunderstanding. In today's NYT, for example, Christopher Burnham, a former Bush administration official, writes:
When Mr. Wolfowitz took over the bank in 2005, he preached the anti-corruption gospel with a zeal that alarmed many career bank staff members and more than a few of its 185 member countries. With his departure, it is eminently possible that his laser-like focus on corruption will go with him.
Well, for one thing, the anti-corruption gospel at the Bank predates Wolfowitz. It was Wolfensohn who made anti-corruption a focal point at the Bank (as Burnham acknowledges in his oped). For another, I am not sure that it is good policy for the Bank to prioritize corruption--as a rule--over other problems that developing nations face. As I have stressed in my work with Ricardo Hausmann and Andres Velasco, the binding constraint on growth differs from country to country. In some cases (Zimbabwe?), governance problems are indeed the most serious binding constraint. In many others, the problems lie elsewhere--in low savings, poorly functioning financial markets, low entrepreneurship, poor infrastructure, and myriad other syndromes of underdevelopment.
Let me make a bolder claim. A development strategy that focused on anti-corruption in China would not have produced anything like the growth rate that this country has experienced since 1978, nor would it have resulted in 400 million plus fewer people in extreme poverty.
Can't the corruption be the reason of poor financial markets and low entrepreneurship? I think that one need always to dig from the roots. And corruption might be an impotant factor down below.
Posted by: Jinny | May 21, 2007 at 03:17 PM
Dani,
You nailed it! If you could only get that through the thick skulls at the WSJ, FOX, et al. Corruption is generally bad. However, many experiences in the world that indicate that it is far from the greatest determinate of a country's success. You are absolutely right about corruption and China. They were able to pursue the policies they did because they traded 'purity' for getting almost everyone on board with their larger vision. China is corrupt, but it was never plundering like Zaire under Mobotu. These differences are not trivial.
Posted by: Anamolous | May 21, 2007 at 03:28 PM
Or in India either!
Posted by: P | May 21, 2007 at 04:49 PM
You have very good points, and I think it is always dangerous to focus on only certain failures of developing countries (poor governance, or any one of the million other things that may be wrong).
One thing with China, and this could apply to India as well, is that the sheer volume of money that poured into these countries over the past few decades overwhelmed any possibilities of corrupt governing plundering ALL of it. This allowed some of the money to fall into the hands of those whom it was meant. I know it is probably much more complicated than that, and I hate making generalizations (as it is all-to-often done when it comes to developing countries). It is something to think about, though.
Posted by: Sean | May 21, 2007 at 08:35 PM
Probably the single biggest driving force behind prosperity or poverty for a nation is average national IQ -- See Lynn & Vanhanen's "IQ and the Wealth of Nations," which demonstrates a 0.7 correlation between average IQ and average per capita income.
For three years, the UN has been pushing a program to raise average national IQs in the Third World by fortifying salt with iodine and flour with iron -- programs that were successfully carried out in America in the 1930s, which eliminated "cretinism" due to a lack of micronutrients. This is an extremely cost-effective poverty-fighter.
Unfortunately, because of the taboo on discussing IQ in the politically correct West, the whole topic of how to raise IQ has barely emerged in the American media. See my 2004 articles:
http://www.vdare.com/Sailer/national_iq.htm
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/copenhagen.htm
Posted by: Steve Sailer | May 21, 2007 at 09:07 PM
Whilst I agree that Wolfowitz's focus on corruption was one-sided and perhaps rhetorical, my own experience working on infrastructure delivery improvement in South Africa is that simple things like awarding tenders to friends and family have put the Government's whole commitment to improving infrastructure (the level, the quality and speed of delivery) at risk. This conclusion comes not only from in-depth research I have done for many years on the problem but also my practical interventions to try change the situation. As long as major incidents of corruption (the billion dollar examples) remain unchallenged, these smaller cases (perhaps a million dollars or less) will be accepted as a 'cost of doing business'. Rhetorical statements by our Government do little to address the problem when some of the main perpetrators play prominent roles in the ruling party and in government.
Posted by: andrew merrifield | May 22, 2007 at 01:31 AM
"Probably the single biggest driving force behind prosperity or poverty for a nation is average national IQ -- See Lynn & Vanhanen's 'IQ and the Wealth of Nations,' which demonstrates a 0.7 correlation between average IQ and average per capita income."
Steve:
How do you know that this doesn't represent the old chicken-and-the-egg problem? My guess is that economic development has a greater effect upon IQ level than IQ level has upon economic development.
Posted by: Justin | May 22, 2007 at 01:52 AM
A Turkish columnist Ege Cansen had written stg. like this: (15 November 2006)
Corruption is generally regarded as a constraining factor for economic development. David Osterfeld who is an American political science professor puts forward it is not always the real situation.
Osterfeld, says that bureucrats who have a fear of getting themselves in trouble if they always permit what entrepreneurs want, evolve a reflexively obstructive behaviour. He states this attitude is an obstacle for economic development. Obsterfeld says there are two kind of corruption which can be defined as "restrictive corruption" and "expansionary corruption". The incentive payment (or premium) for encouraging a bureucrat to take the risk is a kind of expansionary corruption.
Last word: Some microbes are harmful.
Translation my include some imperfection. Anyway I think this is a bit philosophical issue. What does wealth serve for? I think we aim happiness by everything we strieve for. And very briefly; injustice is something that cannot be a basis for general happiness and well-being.
Posted by: cuneydyasin | May 22, 2007 at 04:21 AM
correction:
The "Last word" of Ege Cansen was: Some microbes are NOT harmful.
Posted by: cuneydyasin | May 22, 2007 at 04:31 AM
Why are we downplaying corruption. It is not THE most important factor pulling down the developing countries, nonetheless, it is a big stumbling block.
One of the Prime Minister's of India, Rajiv Gandhi once admitted that only 10% of the government fund gets to reach the intended other 90% is lost in the way. This is a hugh magnitude and cant be ignored. And this is not happening because of economic ineffeciencies. This is solely due to corruption and non accountability on the part of officials in charge of the funds.
In my view, corrpution at any place is not breeding because the citizens are inherently corrput. Individuals are rational everywhere. What matters is whether they are given right incentives. I guess not. In the light of right incentives every rational economic agent will take decisions appropriatly deemed fit by the market.
Posted by: Mac | May 22, 2007 at 01:37 PM
I have to disagree. I believe corruption / bureaucracy is one of the most important, if not THE most important, factors, and definitely within the top three.
First, the claim that other factors are more important, such as "low savings, poorly functioning financial markets, low entrepreneurship, poor infrastructure" looks at symptoms, not causes.
Instead, we must ask WHY do these things exist? The underlying answer in many (most?) cases is corruption / bureaucracy
While economic theory and research studies of developing countries may not show it, go talk to the entrepreneurs and small business owners in a developing country. Go store to store, business to business, and ask them what are their greatest difficulties.
Having done this myself in Eastern Europe, the first and almost unanimous answer was "government corruption and bureaucracy."
Posted by: Justin Rietz | May 22, 2007 at 03:13 PM
Justin writes:
"How do you know that this doesn't represent the old chicken-and-the-egg problem? My guess is that economic development has a greater effect upon IQ level than IQ level has upon economic development."
If I didn't think that spending money could raise national average IQ, I wouldn't be bringing up the UNICEF campaign to fortify salt and flour with crucial micronutrients needed for full cognitive development.
Most of the time, however, causality appears to run in the opposite direction. For example, China was long extremely poor, but had very good average IQ scores. Not it's not so poor anymore as its workers have shown tremendous talent at learning new skills.
For a fuller discussion of this chicken-or-egg question, see my reviews of Lynn & Vanhanen's "IQ & the Wealth of Nations" at
http://www.vdare.com/Sailer/wealth_of_nations.htm
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/lynn_and_flynn.htm
Posted by: Steve Sailer | May 23, 2007 at 12:40 AM
China has achieved unprecedented growth for almost 30 years now, and while perhaps "400 million" people have benefited from this growth by migrating to cities from the countryside and entered the more productive manufacturing sector, today 900 million peasants live at a level at or below that of the early 1950s. China's new wealth is horded by the eastern cities, while the countryside is kept desperately poor by a multi-layered bureaucracy rife with corrupt cadres from Beijing at the top to the village level at the bottom. While China's rich place their wealth in off-shore tax shelters, the peasants are regularly taxed at 30-40%, leaving villagers in some areas with less than $1 a day to live on.
And you're saying corruption need not be addressed NOW in China if it is to continue to grow? Maybe not, but if any meaningful development is to occur, corruption should be on the top of Beijing's list; 900 million peasants living under an oppressive elite class? That sounds like what triggered the revolution in the first place!
Posted by: Jason Welker | May 23, 2007 at 09:04 AM
I have not read Dani's paper in detail [I will do once I get near a printer!] but it occurs to me that the problem is the extent to which corruption is a causal driver for all those things especially poor infrastructure and weak governance.
Its very challenging to isolate the causal linkages and do robust econometrics especially given the data on corruption has been questioned of late.
But I "believe" Dani if he says the econometrics supports is assertion :)
Perhaps Dani you can point me to an empirical survey of some sort that examines your point in more detail?
Thanks.
Posted by: Cho | May 24, 2007 at 04:01 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 01:45 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 09:36 PM
Thank you for introducing me the useful information.And .....Totally boring. can you tell me where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.thank you!
Posted by: mbt shoes sale | May 05, 2010 at 08:51 PM
At present this season's jewelry,but nowadays one of personal adornment first!
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 08, 2010 at 07:30 AM
私はアメリカではないので、ブログの記事は、よく書かれて、私はとても好き読み取り、すべての単語の私は非常に理解、ほとんどまだ読んでいないが、私はあなたの資料では、知識を学ぶことを望んでまた、我々は良い友達になることを願って。ありがとうございました! !
Posted by: replica rolex paypal | May 20, 2010 at 03:02 AM
In general the developed states want natural resources from the less developed states at favorable prices. The developing states want trade policies that encourage local business and nobody cares what the undeveloped states want since they have no clout.
Posted by: who called me | June 09, 2010 at 02:46 AM
wholesale men's clothing a little late on the chain tee print but it’s kinda nice either way. Ecko might have even already did it? Scifen wholesale women's clothing is picking up on demand for sure. Stores from GoGenx to Macys Department Stores back to Dr Jays cheap wholesale clothing store on-line is carrying them. Check the update on GoGenx, frehs! http://www.freewholesale.net
Posted by: Cheap wholesale clothing | June 24, 2010 at 01:37 AM
Why we choose [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/mbt-panda-c-12.html]MBT Panda[/url]? Because [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/]MBT Sandals[/url] is totally different with other footwear. MBT is very special, it has a positive on the entire body, not just the feet. MBT shoes actives your muscles instead of
undermining them. It is unstable, not stable.
The sole is curved, not flat.In other words: It is the antithesis of a shoe.
The mission of our [url=http://www.mbtsandal.com/mbt-imara-c-8.html]Discount MBT lmara Shoes[/url]: To make people all over the world aware if the benefiits of MBT and to help them live healthier and better liver.
Wholesale MBT shoes, MBT shoes discount, cheap MBT right now, hope you could grab the chance.
Posted by: http://www.mbtsandal.com | July 13, 2010 at 03:44 AM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
Posted by: Damier Azur Canvas | July 22, 2010 at 12:58 PM
I am a senior student too, I Love this post as i love study english, This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content.
Posted by: mbt shoes | August 18, 2010 at 10:16 AM
I think this is a great post. One thing that I find the most helpful is number five. Sometimes when I write, I just let the flow of the words and information come out so much that I loose the purpose. It’s only after editing when I realize what I’ve done. There’s defiantly a lot of great tips here I’m going to try to be more aware of.
Posted by: authentic jordans | August 23, 2010 at 01:22 AM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 09:50 PM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 10:21 PM
all depends on attitude! ...Attitude makes altitude. ...Attitude is everything. ...
Posted by: speedy 25 | September 02, 2010 at 01:59 AM
a story
Posted by: ugg outlet | September 09, 2010 at 08:40 PM
i agree with you!your sayiing is right!
Posted by: ugg outlet | September 13, 2010 at 04:33 AM
Our lubricant additives have proved superior performance to control oxidation, inhibit corrosion, dissolve deposits and reduce friction and wear, thus giving the customers the competitive edge.
Posted by: engine additive | September 23, 2010 at 09:44 AM
I was extremely pleased to find this website.I wanted to thank you for this good understand I definitely enjoying every single small bit of it and We've you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | October 01, 2010 at 06:46 AM
actually, I don't think so.
Posted by: gucci outlet | October 04, 2010 at 08:49 AM
raf
Thanks a lot for article.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 23, 2011 at 12:16 PM
Thanks for your opinion. I totally agree with it.I like buy cheap designer handbags at http://www.mybestbags.com as well and someone is looking for cheap coach handbags fsdfds
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 05, 2011 at 11:12 PM
Raf
raf
I like it ... Thanks !!
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 29, 2011 at 08:10 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you !!!
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 04, 2011 at 12:24 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks for comment ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 11, 2011 at 01:01 PM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier
sexshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:19 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it
sexyshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:20 PM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:20 PM
No one trusts the Congress for the reason why it lies and grandstands to market by itself. Shed Building
Posted by: Teslapow | September 27, 2011 at 12:28 AM
This is good site to spent time on .I just stumbled upon your informative blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your very well written blog posts. I will be your frequent visitor, that's for sure.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 01:36 PM
wesome, Very interesting issue that after a very successful. Nicely written article good work ! Thanks for the great piece of sharing. Enjoy to read your write . Thanks a lot
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LUSiEkDPBtU/UAwsxZ2NG7I/AAAAAAAAAn4/Nih7ouhx3gY/s320/Bavetline%2BAgen%2BJudi%2BBola%2BTerpercaya.jpg
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 23, 2012 at 08:48 PM
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog, I will keep visiting this blog very often
cheap dresses online
Posted by: cheapdresslily | November 02, 2012 at 04:10 AM
They should take up building BVLGARI Watches dams for power generation. We should FRANCK MULLER watches learn from china. china manufacturing
Posted by: Jerry John | December 31, 2012 at 08:21 AM
Bank Mandiri Bank Terbaik di Indonesia
Bank Mandiri Bank Terbaik di Indonesia
Promo Bonus 100% Sbobet, Ibcbet dan Casino Online Dalam Rangka HUT BAVETLINE Yang Kedua
Masterbet88 Grand Opening Promo Bonus 50% Sportsbook dan Casino Online
Posted by: Rastia Rigie | January 15, 2013 at 02:27 AM
business. Mercantilism, by contrast, offers a corporatist vision in which the state and private business are allies and cooperate in pursuit of common objectives, such as domestic economic growth or national power. 1st Web Directory
Posted by: Tom Watson | January 24, 2013 at 05:57 AM