Brad picks up the discussion on trade and prices, and says he is confused by it. He writes in relation to an earlier post of mine:
Yes, prices of exportables rise and prices of importables fall [as a result of free trade]. But importables have a higher weight in consumption than in production (that's why we import them). And exportables have a lower weight in consumption than in production (that's why we export them). So if the average price of production stays the same--and incomes stay the same, because everything paid to buy our production winds up as somebody's income--then the average price of consumption falls.
I think we do agree on the economics, which is not rocket science after all. Under the usual conditions, trade does increase aggregate real incomes, and whether that is because the numerator (nominal income) rises or the denominator (price level) falls is immaterial--and in fact something that micro-economic theory cannot shed light on.
But this discussion has never been about the aggregate gains from trade, and that is why Brad is confused I think. I started on this particular thread to make a point about distributional effects. The argument on prices is often presented as if it is an add-on to the income-side effects of trade, and one that can override otherwise important distributional consequences. "Yes, these workers might lose their jobs, but look how much the rest of us benefit on account of lower prices." See for example the post by Dan Drezner that started me off. My point was that the "but..." part of the argument is irrelevant or need not hold. In particular:
(a) In our workhorse model of trade (the HOS model), certain groups will lose out from trade, regardless of price movements.
(b) And in other models (such as those with some sector-specific factors), whether any particular group of workers gains from the price effects of trade depends on how their consumption basket relates to traded goods. If you are a worker who consumes a lot of the export good (my Argentine example), you will be worse off, regardless of the aggregate relationships discussed by Brad (i.e., even though exportables may have a smaller share in consumption than in production in aggregate).
I should add that because of these distributional effects, the median (i.e., typical) consumer can also end up worse off, to the extent that her income sources and budget shares differ from those of the average. So before you take too much comfort about all the cheap prices at Wal-Mart, these are some of the things you have to worry about.
So my earlier summary of these issues is still pretty good, I think.
I have no trouble following the discussions about trade if the country's trade is in rough balance. But how does it impact the arguments and gains or loses when the country run a large and significant trade deficit as the US is doing? Excluding the impact through the interest rate side of the model does the fact that the import side is much larger then the export side change the cost-benefit calculations?
Posted by: spencer | May 17, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Aha. Price effects as an add-on to gains-from-trade is clearly a non-starter...
Somebody else, somewhere, suggested a model in which increased trade decreased local market power, and in a model with menu costs led to decreased inflation. But I'm not sure it was coherent...
Brad
Posted by: Brad DeLong | May 17, 2007 at 10:13 PM
What about the differences between the short run and the medium / long run? Is there any disagreement that in the long run opening up markets to free trade is beneficial to all parties?
In the short run, there is an increase in domestic unemployment and a decrease in wage levels caused by lower priced imports. However, the new markets for exports creates an increase in demand for exported goods, causing the domestic prices of these goods to increase. Businesses in the exporting industries, faced with lower wage levels and higher prices for their goods, hire more workers and increase production - basic MR = MC equilibrium. Moreover, lower wage levels will also entice businesses not directly involved in trade to hire more workers and expand production.
The result: wage levels bounce back, the domestic price of exported goods drops, and general production increases (with the possible result of an across the board increase in consumer purchasing power).
Obviously this takes some time to occur. Therefore, the trade policy that would follow from this would be: continue to open up markets to free trade and provide short-term support (unemployment benefits, retraining stipends) for workers impacted directly by cheaper imports. We can consider the costs of these short term safety net measures as "punishment" for having protectionist policies in the first place. Eventually, all markets (domestic) will be open to free trade and we won't have anything to blog about ;-)
Posted by: Justin Rietz | May 18, 2007 at 12:08 AM
I'm confused.
I don't know if it can "override" dsitributional issues. My guess is for someone who lost their job to overseas competition, cheaper consumer goods don't make up for their loss of welfare, that being said, the change in the relative price of imports as a result of free trade (for the rest of us), IS an "add on" to the separate comparative advantage restructuring benefits of liberalization, is it not?
Posted by: DRR | May 18, 2007 at 10:35 AM
I love air jordan shoes .
Posted by: air jordan shoes | January 05, 2010 at 04:43 AM
Nike Shox|Nike Shox Sale is special for you with a very pretty design
Posted by: nike shox sale | January 09, 2010 at 03:45 AM
thanks so much admin ı love jordan
Posted by: sohbet | January 10, 2010 at 05:51 PM
Don't waste your time on a man/woman, who isn't willing to waste their time on you.
Posted by: Ugg london | January 11, 2010 at 09:11 PM
CHI flat iron by Farouk system. Direct from the manufacturer, this genuine Chi ceramic iron comes with valid, one year warranty!
Posted by: chi flat iron | January 14, 2010 at 03:36 AM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 01:47 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 09:40 PM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 03:54 AM
I am a senior student, I Love your blog as i love study english, I learn much from this post, i ths very much.
Posted by: Moncler | August 15, 2010 at 10:18 AM
I am a senior student too, I Love this post as i love study english, This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content.
Posted by: mbt shoes | August 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people
Posted by: Moncler | August 27, 2010 at 05:22 AM
If our interpretation is correct, no rebalancing of the labor force can restore a more equal distribution of productivity gains without government intervention and changes in private sector behavior.
Posted by: louis vuitton pochette | September 02, 2010 at 02:20 AM
raf
Thanks a lot.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM
celikraf
celikraf
thanks ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 31, 2011 at 01:24 PM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you ...
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 01, 2011 at 03:03 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier
sexshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:29 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it
sexyshop
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:29 PM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 19, 2011 at 05:30 PM