Actually a lot of respondents got this right, but the answer is counterintuitive as some also mentioned. The correct answer is that a poor person in a rich country is three times better off than a rich person in a poor country (given my definition of what "rich" and "poor" mean in this context). It is not even close.
The relevant numbers are below (in 2004 PPP-adjusted dollars). The reason we are tempted to answer "rich in a poor country" is the obvious wealth at the very top of the income distribution. But by the time you average the entire top 10%, the income level goes down quite a bit.
The next question would be to do the same for health indicators, say life expectancy. My preliminary calculations indicate that the answer is the same--but I do not have a definite answer yet.
|
Per-capita GDP
|
Income share of …
|
Representative income of …
|
Poor country
|
$868
|
top decile in poor countries = 0.35
|
Rich individual in poor country = $3,039
|
Rich country
|
$34,767
|
bottom decile in rich countries
= 0.027
|
Poor individual in rich country = $9,387
|
Oh, what a surprise. Seriously, were there really people out there who believed the contrary?
Posted by: Pearl | May 06, 2007 at 09:09 AM
I believe someone mentioned this on the previous post, but I'll just say it again here. Though monetarily, a poor person in a rich country might be better off, this says nothing about the actual welfare. There are numerous studies showing that happiness is directly correlated to relative income. Further, though we would like to think that a poor person in a rich country would have social programs and safety nets, not to mention the possibility of upward mobility, this is often not the case. Case in point: the almost 50 million people in the US without health insurance.
Posted by: Sean | May 06, 2007 at 10:39 AM
Was this controlled by standard of living?
You have to be pretty well off in this country to have live in help, whereas inmuch of the world this is a standard feature of middle-class life. There are reasons why middle class Americans retire to Mexico even not speaking the language, the dollar goes farther there. It is not just a question of relative income, it is a question of actual exchange value. How much goods does that $3k buy compared to the $9k?
And I question trying to define 'rich' and 'poor' by decile and use that to define 'better off'. This builds in the assumption that income distribution has the same shape of curve. Whereas in fact we know that different countries have different degrees of wealth concentration. It seems a better way to capture this would be to turn the calculation around and break up the GDP by decile. For example you could define 'rich' as 'those controlling 90% of GDP' and then dividing that by the numbers in that category.
Arbitrarily defining 'rich' by population decile puts you at risk of the Bill Gates Syndrome. If nine guys are sitting in a bar and Bill walks end then everyone is worth $4.4 billion. In the Congo it might well be that fully 90% of national wealth is in the hands of the top 1%. Certainly it is ridiculous to suggest that you are somehow better off in the United States living on $9000 than Mobuto who was sitting on more than a $billion.
Posted by: Bruce Webb | May 06, 2007 at 11:44 AM
Like a lot of people I pretty much ignored point three of your conditions.
But I'm interested, exactly what countries are in the list
point 3 restricts the question to-- the bottom decile of countries?
Posted by: spencer | May 06, 2007 at 01:56 PM
It is important to bear in mind that assumption 1 is unrealistic: We do not just care about our own consumption possibilities. Instead we constantly compare ourselves with others - If our real income remains constant but that of other members of the society rises, we feel actually worse off.
Even with greater consumption possibilities in a rich country, my welfare in a poor country is likely to be higher.
(Because my "rank" in the society is higher)
A realistic utility function should include this spillover effect.
Posted by: ds | May 06, 2007 at 02:30 PM
Bruce Webb,
By adjusting for purchasing power parity you have controlled for 'standard of living' (if I am understanding your question correctly). However, your point about the live-in help touches on an interesting argument: as I understand it, purchasing power parity figures tend to be calculated across a 'basket of goods' that includes all goods and services purchasable in a country. Yet in developing countries, services tend to be much cheaper (relative to basic goods) than they are in the developed world. Hence the live-in help being easier to come by. When purchasing power parity is used in poverty calculations, this becomes a potential methodological issue because services like live-in help are totally irrelevant to the poor, yet they are still included in PPP calculations (we're talking World Bank here, by the way) which leads to a lower poverty line and lower poverty figures than if your PPP basket was limited to simply items relevant to the poor. This is what is at the heart of Sanjay Reddy's critique of World Bank poverty measurements. You can read more at www.socialanalysis.org
cheers
Terence
Posted by: terence | May 06, 2007 at 03:42 PM
Sean and ds,
My copy of Richard Layard's book is at home, so I'm relying on my memory here - which is a risky thing to do at the best of times, let alone a Monday morning.
But I think you'll find that happiness becomes more of an relative function only after a point. Up until a certain per capita income there are, IIRC, pretty strong returns to absolute income. Only after that point do diminishing returns set in and other factors become more important. And I'd say that bottom decile countries are well below the key per capita income.
Posted by: terence | May 06, 2007 at 03:50 PM
Unfortunately it doesn't quite provide the answers to the questions about health, but Gap Minder's representation of the 2005 HDR makes for a very interesting watch (as opposed to read) with regards to the interaction between health and wealth and inequality:
http://tinyurl.com/yu7esc
Posted by: terence | May 06, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Spencer - I assume this list is accurate:
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html
Posted by: minderbender | May 06, 2007 at 05:21 PM
This answer is technically correct based on the way we've decided to look at it in this case. Sen has a famous article titled "Poor, Relatively Speaking" (Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, Vol. 35, No. 2 (Jul., 1983), pp. 153-169) that looks at the question from a different angle--because the poor man in the US makes RELATIVELY a lot less that the average person in his orbit he feels and thus to an extent is much poorer than the rich man in the poor country.
Posted by: Gallagher | May 06, 2007 at 07:17 PM
Dear Mr Rodrik,
May i pose a similar question for your users.
"Would you rather be an elite in a poor country or a nobody in a rich country?"
I would certainly like to know your answer, atleast.
Regards.
Posted by: sez.bad | May 06, 2007 at 10:25 PM
sez.bad,
Once you mention the word elite the question becomes more interesting still, because elites also gain an additional benefit: power. And, through this, some opportunity to influence the circumstances that they make their lives in. People living in poverty are typically denied this.
Posted by: terence | May 06, 2007 at 10:38 PM
I would agree with Gallagher, rich and poor is a relative concept. In my country, Poland, everybody is better off 15 years after collapse of socialism (life expectancy, number of houshold appl., number of cars, phones, infant mortality rates, you name it). But in opinion polls many people feel they lived better under socialism. It is probably becasue "I have a car, but my neighbor has a better one, so it makes me feel bad, under socialism we both had nothing and this felt better".
I think the title of Dani Rorik blog needs a correction. His line of thought is no longer unconventional, it will be the main stream in XXI century, see recent book by Tornell and Westermann.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Posted by: Rybinski | May 07, 2007 at 05:11 AM
Since the result on rich/poor turns, in part, on the degress of inequality in rich countries, what is the result if we limit the "rich" field to the more unequal United States. Is it better to be poor in America than rich in the composite poor countries?
Posted by: John Maggs | May 07, 2007 at 11:47 AM
Hands down, you are much better off being in the top 10% in a poor country than in the bottom 10% in a rich country. The analysis above is way too simplistic, and even the numbers are disputable (from sampling errors to use of income concept). To caricature this a wee bit:
Being in the top decile of a poor country likely means you have a good job, some level of status, opportunities for advancement and travel, education, better health and on and on. Being poor in a rich country (excepting students in transition, etc) is equivalent to a crappy job, no control over your circumstances, no opportunities for advancement or to live the type of life you find valuable, no education, poor health.
An important element missing is wealth. In most poor countries the richest decile in terms of assets controls upwards of 90% of the total. In rich countries the bottom decile has zero, if not negative, net assets.
Mr Rodrik, as posed above, would you really choose to be in the bottom decile in the US than in the top decile in Nicaragua?
Posted by: Marc Lee | May 07, 2007 at 01:12 PM
Marc, Nicaragua is poor. I think we'd all agree. But it is not near the bottom decile in PPP terms.
And it doesn't matter whether you calculate by listing countries or counting population, the bottom decile pretty much only includes sub-Saharan Africa countries plus maybe Afghanistan/NKorea and minus South Africa.
These are not cushy countries to live in. Only the true elite (Delong's upper .1%) is not actively looking for better opportunities abroad.
Posted by: Dan K | May 07, 2007 at 05:27 PM
That's a sobering clarification. I was pretty sure that Nicaragua was near the bottom. But if my choices are Sub-Saharan Africa, North Korea and Afghanistan, then maybe being anywhere in the distribution is not a pleasant choice. But then neither is being in the bottom 10% in the US. This one might just be a roll of the dice.
Posted by: Marc Lee | May 07, 2007 at 06:50 PM
Please ask Prof. Robert Frank of Cornell to answer your question? He says, if I understand him correctly, that relative rather than absolute income is more important in determining happiness and satisfaction with one's life. Personally, I would rather be in the lower decile in the U.S. than in the top decile in poor African countries, but I would rather be in the top decile in Latin America, in Colombia, Peru, or Chile, than in the lowest decile in the U.S.
Posted by: William R. Rhoads | May 07, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Dani, you know very well that if you depart from false statements, you cannot derive correct conclusions...
Even you have a broader idea of consumption that the one you use for this post...
Posted by: FA | May 09, 2007 at 12:20 AM
The interesting thing, looking at the UNDP Gapminder report, it all depends on how you define "rich" and "poor." Dr. Rodrik uses the top and bottom decile, but if you change it to the top and bottom 1 percent, the standards of living for the extremely rich in poor countries is far superior in many facets to the standard of living of the super poor in wealth societies. The super rich in Latin America, China, India, and the Middle East are much better off than those on welfare in the US, UK, and Italy.
Posted by: Ben | May 09, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Some of the above comments about the importance of relative income don't seem to be supported by what people say about how satisfied they are with life. See my blog: http://www.wintonbates.bigblog.com.au/post.do?id=183306
Posted by: Winton Bates | December 04, 2007 at 12:47 AM
This is clearly replica watches the job for our legal fraternity to engage the establishment to necessary breitling watches steps by filing petitions in various courts. IF one fails another should be cartier watches filed taking every one to task. It is rolex watches useless to suggest ways and means to solve tag heuer watches the day to day problem to well paid employees tissot watches of government controlled establishments. Only active omega watches judiciary will resolve this problem.
http://www.watchvisa.com
http://www.watchvisa.com/breitling-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/cartier-watches.html
Posted by: rolex watches | February 25, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Why is everyone just montblanc watches willing to accept power cuts? Don't you think that patek philippe watches having continious power is your right? If people aren't going to demand rado watches 24X7 power, don't expect anything zenith watches to change. The government needs to look at other sources parmigiani watches of power generation. The only solution is more power panerai watches production. Nothing less.
http://www.watchvisa.com/montblanc-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/patek_philippe-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/rado-watches.html
http://www.watchvisa.com/tudor-watches.html
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 12:45 AM
People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com
Posted by: rolex watches | April 19, 2010 at 09:18 PM
For a market study on a proposed movie project, I am trying to
identify any and all movies (but particularly those that are
well-known or were commercially successful) which have as their main
theme or focus,
Posted by: generic cialis | April 28, 2010 at 01:00 AM
This part of the comment "The correct answer is that a poor person in a rich country is three times better off than a rich person in a poor country (given my definition of what "rich" and "poor" mean in this context). It is not even close." I find very interesting, thanks for the information!
Posted by: dental health center | April 30, 2010 at 02:48 PM
this is a splendid post and I would give a five out of five rating to it. Need some more posts like this to be coming out Thank you and looking for more of this kind. http://www.brandnew-shoes.com/ women's sandals to you!
Posted by: nike shox shoes | May 04, 2010 at 03:06 AM
Thank you for introducing me the wonderful information.And .....Totally boring. Where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.here is my [email protected]
Posted by: mbt shoes sale | May 04, 2010 at 11:04 PM
Thank you for introducing me the wonderful information.And .....Totally boring. Where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.here is website http://www.supermbtshoes.com
Posted by: mbt shoes sale | May 05, 2010 at 01:06 AM
Thank you for introducing me the wonderful information.And .....Totally boring. Where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.here is website http://www.supermbtshoes.com
Posted by: mbt shoes sale | May 05, 2010 at 01:06 AM
nothing is impossible.
Posted by: mbt shoes | May 05, 2010 at 09:10 PM
I don't think so, people are so different with different views.
Posted by: gucci outlet | May 07, 2010 at 02:00 AM
Thank you for introducing me the useful information.And .....Totally boring. can you tell me where is the red and gold colors...? I predict a very low seller....I look forward your answer.thank you!
Posted by: cheap mbt shoes | May 07, 2010 at 03:03 AM
The question is how are we going to change it?
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 08, 2010 at 03:19 AM
The question is how are we going to change it?
Posted by: Nike Air Jordan | May 08, 2010 at 03:19 AM
oh, it is good , i like it very much!!!
http://www.shoeglobal.com
Posted by: max 90 | May 19, 2010 at 06:52 AM
oh, it is good , i like it very much!!!
http://www.shoeglobal.com
Posted by: max 90 | May 19, 2010 at 06:53 AM
oh, it is good ,
http://www.shoeglobal.com fda
Posted by: max 90 | May 19, 2010 at 06:55 AM
oh, it is good ,
http://www.shoeglobal.com afdfa
Posted by: max 90 | May 19, 2010 at 06:56 AM
country than in the bottom 10% in a rich country. The analysis above is way too simplistic, and even the numbers are disputable (from sampling errors to use of income concept). To caricature this a wee bit:
Being in the top decile of a poor country likely means you have a good job, some level of status, opportunities for advancement and travel, education, better health and on and on. Being poor in a rich country (excepting students in transition, etc) is equivalent to a crappy job, no control over your circumstances, no opportunities for advancement or to live the type of life you find valuable, no education, poor health.
http://www.shoeglobal.com
Posted by: max 95 | May 19, 2010 at 06:57 AM
oh, thank u so much
good url:
http://www.jerseylink.com
http://www.hghdoctor.com
Posted by: mlb jerseys | May 29, 2010 at 05:33 AM
So, some tip about this issue are welcome and really sorry if my question is very simple. Thanks in advance
Posted by: replica handbags | May 29, 2010 at 05:56 AM
I am a senior student from china, my english name is Eva, I like e-commerce, e-commerce easy and fast that is the reason i like it, and I learned professional is e-commerce, so after graduation I want to be a B2C e-commerce sites, i like like bar accessories products, and i like this website Posi Pourers, I like this site, which will soon operate a the style of her own station, but I like the bar products, who can provide the oak bar stool please give me help
Posted by: jersey | May 30, 2010 at 07:07 AM
great,good article. do not give up
Posted by: jersey | May 30, 2010 at 07:12 AM
I would certainly like to know your answer, atleast.
Regards.
Posted by: jersey | May 30, 2010 at 07:17 AM
It would be interesting to do a similar graph of Japan vs. US average tariff rates from 1980 up to the present. Such a graph would show that the Japanese are no worse than we are when it comes to protectionism. Revisionism on this issue is badly needed.
Posted by: who called me | June 09, 2010 at 01:52 AM
There were timberland 6 inch sensitivity and a beauty to her that have nothing to do with timberland 6 inch boots looks. She was one to be listened to, whose words were so easy to take to timberland boots sale heart.I used to find notes left in the collection basket, beautiful timberland boots outlet notes about my homilies and about the writer's black timberland boots thoughts on the daily scriptural readings. The person who penned the notes mens timberland boots would add reflections to my thoughts and would always include some timberland pro boots quotes from poets and mystics he or she had white timberland boots read and remembered and loved. The notes fascinated black timberland shoes uk me. Here was someone immersed in a search for truth and beauty. Words had been cheap timberland boots treasured, words that were beautiful. And I felt as if the words timberland waterproof boots somehow delighted in being discovered, for they were obviously very generous to the as yet anonymous timberland work boots writer of the notes. And now this person was in turn learning the secret of sharing them. Beauty so shines when given away. The only truth that exists timberland hiking boots is, in that sense, free. http://www.timberland6inch.com/
Posted by: timberland 6 inch | July 16, 2010 at 06:09 AM
There were timberland 6 inch sensitivity and a beauty to her that have nothing to do with timberland 6 inch boots looks. She was one to be listened to, whose words were so easy to take to timberland boots sale heart.I used to find notes left in the collection basket, beautiful timberland boots outlet notes about my homilies and about the writer's black timberland boots thoughts on the daily scriptural readings. The person who penned the notes mens timberland boots would add reflections to my thoughts and would always include some timberland pro boots quotes from poets and mystics he or she had white timberland boots read and remembered and loved. The notes fascinated black timberland shoes uk me. Here was someone immersed in a search for truth and beauty. Words had been cheap timberland boots treasured, words that were beautiful. And I felt as if the words timberland waterproof boots somehow delighted in being discovered, for they were obviously very generous to the as yet anonymous timberland work boots writer of the notes. And now this person was in turn learning the secret of sharing them. Beauty so shines when given away. The only truth that exists timberland hiking boots is, in that sense, free. http://www.timberland6inch.com/
Posted by: timberland 6 inch | July 16, 2010 at 08:05 AM
DMOZ4U is a quality Free Web Directory, human edited Free Web Directory with quality internet resources. Submit free link, or find websites of your choice.
Posted by: free web directory | July 18, 2010 at 09:35 PM
I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com
http://www.nikeairmaxshoe.ocm
Posted by: lachou | July 26, 2010 at 09:39 PM
I am a senior student too, I Love this post as i love study english, This article is to my feelings, thanks for your sharing, hoping to see more useful content.
Posted by: mbt shoes | August 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM
I think this is a great post. One thing that I find the most helpful is number five. Sometimes when I write, I just let the flow of the words and information come out so much that I loose the purpose. It’s only after editing when I realize what I’ve done. There’s defiantly a lot of great tips here I’m going to try to be more aware of.
Posted by: jordans for sale | August 23, 2010 at 01:11 AM
Extremely great post, really beneficial stuff. Never thought I’d find the facts I would like in this article. I’ve been looking all over the net for some time now and was starting to get irritated. Thankfully, I stumbled onto your website and received exactly what I was looking for.
Posted by: jordan shoes for sale | August 24, 2010 at 01:36 AM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: jordan shoes | August 24, 2010 at 09:43 PM
The correct answer is that a poor person in a rich country is three times better off than a rich person in a poor country (given my definition of what "rich" and "poor" mean in this context).
Posted by: cheap jerseys | September 08, 2010 at 07:34 PM
i agree with you!your sayiing is right!
Posted by: ugg boots | September 13, 2010 at 03:35 AM
The first stage Wedding Dresses of spring wedding will give you so many things to plan and organize. Taking some time first to think and jot down some initial wedding ideas or Evening Gowns themes is really important before referring to any wedding vendors or Evening Dresses
venues. In this way, you will be able to easily conceptualize the perfect touches Quinceanera Dresses for your spring wedding day.As we all know, spring is the mark of time of birth and renewal. Having your wedding in this beautiful season can bestow a marriage life full of excitement and adventure.
Posted by: weddingdresses | September 15, 2010 at 09:34 PM
Local Line LLC is specialised in providing Services and supplies to oil and gas sectors.
Posted by: Belarus Kali | September 21, 2010 at 03:14 AM
The larger population is pourer the country is.
Posted by: gucci messenger | October 05, 2010 at 07:51 PM
good writing style very interesting
Posted by: أيفون | October 24, 2010 at 12:53 PM
The larger population is pourer the country is.
Posted by: thomas sabo schmuck | November 04, 2010 at 01:16 AM
The innovative design with super quality and shinny colors with different styles make clearance Coach Wallets on sale at coachoutletvip.com become one of the most popular brand wallets all over the world, content with coach mens wallet cheap on sale and discount coach purses for women. With help of multilayers inside design from cheap coach wallets outlet for sale, you can collect different kinds of cards and put money inside that you want to. I'm sure you'll find what you want among the great amount of clearance coach purses on sale here. Welcome to coach online store and buy them now. Enjoy the fashion world now.
Posted by: Coach Wallets | November 09, 2010 at 01:54 AM
Thank you for sharing to us.
Please one more post about that..
Posted by: Finpecia | November 16, 2010 at 03:19 AM
It's in the question itself. Of course, people can't afford if the price is too high for the minimum food they eat.
Posted by: pandora-bracelets-australia | November 22, 2010 at 08:44 PM
raf
Thanks.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 23, 2011 at 01:03 PM
Wow, nice post,there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post
Generic Viagra
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 05, 2011 at 08:26 AM
Hola,
Realmente buen trabajo, hay muchas personas en busca de eso ahora van a encontrar suficientes fuentes por tus consejos.
También se espera para más consejos acerca de que,
Regards,
メファキン
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 11, 2011 at 04:02 AM
hey buddy,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the same theme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.
Generic Viagra
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 13, 2011 at 06:33 AM
Hie primum ipsum visitabo hic. Ita multi inveni in vasa interesting maxime Weblog eius discussionem. Tons de tuis commentationes articles, suspicor non sum solus omnem habens fructum praesens est! sustine bonos vsus.
Regards,
Ports Automation
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 26, 2011 at 04:30 AM
Skönt att vara besöka din blogg igen, har det varit månader för mig. Väl här artikeln som jag har väntat så länge. Jag behöver den här artikeln för att slutföra mitt uppdrag i kollegiet, och den har samma tema med din artikel. Tack, bra aktie.
Generic Levitra |
http://www.bellspharmacy.com/maincategory/7/generic-levitra.html
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 16, 2011 at 08:28 AM
Raf
raf
I like it ... Thanks !!
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 29, 2011 at 08:21 AM
Raf
raf
Thanks to you !!!
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 04, 2011 at 04:00 PM
Hey, Really great work,
I would like to join your blog anyway so please continue sharing with us,
http://www.onlinemedicalstore.net/allergy-allegra-fexofenadine-c-1_10
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 22, 2011 at 04:31 AM
I have wanted to learn more about particular topics, but not many websites would help me out in informing me the way I expected. This left me with many question, but after reading your article, I got an answer to all my questions. You are too cool dude!!!
Regards,
Generic Drugs Exporter
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 22, 2011 at 06:29 AM
Hey,
Great idea, I would like to read your post every day,
Caverta
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 23, 2011 at 02:23 AM
hey buddy,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the sametheme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.
http://www.bellspharmacy.com/category/6/zenegra.html
Posted by: Account Deleted | June 30, 2011 at 01:35 AM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
Posted by: Account Deleted | July 20, 2011 at 08:33 AM
Welcome to the do follow community I am hoping for a great work from you in the future. iPhone Application Developer
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 11, 2011 at 09:31 AM
am also interested in this topic. I have spent a lot of time on searching this kind of topic. It is very informative.
organic seo service
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 13, 2011 at 02:04 PM
income may be distributed more unequally in the U.S., but that is largely irrelevant. As the chart below shows, very few Chinese are richer than the poorest Americans. The distributions of income for the two countries barely overlap. iPhone 4S Unlocked
Posted by: Claudio Timbers | January 11, 2013 at 02:33 AM
Way cool valid arguments! Thank you for making this article available the rest of the site is also of high quality. Have fun.haber oyun çizgi film sağlık
Posted by: D | April 09, 2013 at 09:54 AM