By Maggie McMillan, guest blogger
When economists talk about structural transformation, they typically have in mind developing countries and the dual economy models à la W. Arthur Lewis that emphasize productivity differentials between broad sectors of the economy, such as agriculture and manufacturing. They don't usually think about countries like the United States where this type of transformation has already taken place. But the figure below indicates that it is something we should be thinking about. The horizontal axis shows that between 1998 and 2007, the share of the labor force in manufacturing fell by around 3%. The share of the labor force in services (cspsgs) increased by a little more than two percent. The problem with this is that labor productivity in services is lower than economywide productivity (vertical axis) so this sectoral shift in employment lowers economywide productivity. Note that these changes took place before the Great Recession (the picture looks much worse for the period 1998 to 2009).
Note: Abbreviations are as follows: (agr) Agriculture; (min) Mining; (mfg) Manufacturing; (pu) Public Utilities; (con) Construction; (wrt) Retail and Wholesale Trade; (tsc) Transport and Communication; (fire) Finance and Business Services; (cspsgs) Community, Social, Personal and Government Services.
The cost of this transformation has not been well understood. For example, one often hears that the loss of jobs in manufacturing is no big deal because productivity in manufacturing is increasing and this will drive growth. But this argument ignores the economywide effects of labor reallocation. Another argument that is often heard is that we don't need to worry about losing jobs in manufacturing because jobs in professional and business services are growing. But average labor productivity in professional and business services (not shown separately) is lower than average labor productivity in manufacturing. Using the March version of the Current Population Survey which follows workers over time, Ebenstein et al ( http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~ebenstein/) show that the majority of workers who leave manufacturing end up in the service sector where their wages are between 3 and 11 percent lower.
The key question is: what is driving this pattern? I don't have an airtight identification strategy but I have a hunch that it has something to do with China. Here's why. Between 1998 and 2007, offshore employment to China by U.S. based manufacturing firms increased from around 100,000 to around 600,000 or roughly 500 percent. In 2008, China held more U.S. affiliate jobs than any other country in the world. This is a first - affiliate activity has typically been concentrated in high income countries. Over this same period, manufacturing employment in the U.S. contracted sharply. But the smoking gun lies in the figure below. It shows a strong negative correlation by sector between manufacturing employment in China and manufacturing employment in the United States. It seems highly unlikely that this pattern is driven by labor-saving technological change in the U.S. I guess it could be driven by underlying changes in demand, but I doubt it.
I was wondering if this argument [1] can be used to make a case that the productivity gap between industry and service will increase in the future...
[1] http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2011/06/is-information-technology-a-general-purpose-technology.html
Posted by: Mcz Fea | June 17, 2011 at 05:47 PM
It's an unexamined assumption that this pattern began in 1998. What if it began in the 70s? Then China's rise is just another link in the chain.
Posted by: Kimmitt | June 17, 2011 at 10:51 PM
In particular, I'm referring to the famous productivity slowdown in the 70s and 80s attributed to, among many other things, the rise of the EPA and OSHA.
Posted by: Kimmitt | June 17, 2011 at 10:53 PM
The next step for the US is not getting manufacturing bases back from the Chinese via tarriffs, etc, but educating its workforce that seems so distraught over the loss of these low-paying jobs.
How much is Harvard? 200,000 for a 4 year stint? That's comtemptable. Thankfully, unlike the US health care system, there are great options for Americans to get educated. So why are so many crying over the loss of manufacturing jobs?
Posted by: 21tigermike | June 18, 2011 at 03:01 AM
Where are you getting the stats about off shoring to China from? I'd like to see what sectors the change is coming from.
I'm not that convinced by your smoking gun graph. What are the dates on the data points? The correlation could just represent offset business cycles. China was in a slump 98-99 because of the Asian financial crisis, while the US was at the peak of a boom. After that the bubble popped and was followed by a jobless recovery, while the Chinese economy expanded non stop.
Not that I don't think Chinese manufacturing policy has nothing to do with employment in the states, I don't think that chart necessarily shows it though.
Posted by: Alf Hickey | June 19, 2011 at 08:45 AM
The graph about China is not convincing at all. You are looking at variation over time, so time trends where the US sector is trending down while the Chinese is trending up would easily generate such a strong correlation. I am actually a bit surprised it is not stronger (it must have to do with business cycles).
Posted by: Youcef Msaid | June 20, 2011 at 09:20 AM
rafsistemleri I am really fan of your site. Thanks.Good work.
rafsistemleri I am really fan of your site. Thanks.Good work.
Posted by: Murat özer | June 22, 2011 at 04:11 AM
Well, I'm glad to see that you PhD econ types are finally figuring out what the rest of us knew a long time ago: 5 bucks an hour flippin burgers aint' a union job at the steel mill.
Maybe another 20 years, you will understand that free trade is not always a good idea (and don't give me that theoretical BS that free trade is always good; like they say, in theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice, they ain't.)
Posted by: jooe | June 24, 2011 at 12:57 PM
it si good
http://www.stfitting.com
http://www.st-pipefittings.com
http://www.topfitting.com
http://www.bwfitting.com
http://www.stting.com
Posted by: Jason Zhang | June 25, 2011 at 10:44 PM
Do not , for one repulse , give up thepurposcheap jordanse that you resolved to effect .
Posted by: Amy Smith | June 27, 2011 at 10:19 PM
A friend in need is a friend indeed
http://www.globalnikeshox.com
Posted by: Amy Smith | June 27, 2011 at 10:21 PM
dreambox dm8000 hddreambox dm800 hddreambox dm500 hd
dreambox dm7020
Posted by: Ko Lin | July 04, 2011 at 01:14 AM
I agree with that, sir.
Posted by: KOHL IRONBUY | July 07, 2011 at 11:05 PM
I don't think so, China developing out of a third world country will only benefit the US in the long run.
Grants for College
Free Money For College
Posted by: jackson | July 10, 2011 at 03:37 PM
show that the majority of workers who leave manufacturing end up in the service sector where their wages are between 3 and 11 percent lower.
I have somewhat of an issue with this statement. There are lots of people in the service sector that are making very good wages. Are we talking about HVAC mechanics, electricians,etc; or customer service agents working for IT companies etc; ???
http://www.cynergysoftware.com
http://www.verticalwavepbxphonesystem.com
Posted by: Steve58.wordpress.com | July 14, 2011 at 03:22 PM
Thanks for sharing.
raf sistemleri
Posted by: Mimarca_raf | July 15, 2011 at 07:14 AM
are anxious that ministry of education for the reform and development of the spirit, as soon as possible to solve the good education
http://www.cheapghdstraightenerssale.co.uk/
Posted by: Mbtmbtshoes | July 18, 2011 at 09:31 PM
What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop online
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002124083688 | July 19, 2011 at 04:16 PM
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. I put a link to my site to here so other people can read it
sexyshop
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002124083688 | July 19, 2011 at 04:18 PM
Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier
sexshop
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002124083688 | July 19, 2011 at 04:18 PM
alongador peniano
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002124083688 | July 22, 2011 at 09:22 AM
to put his collusion high pressure. Advocates "honest", "water birds type" diplomacy of some of the SongZiWen hu shi "movement" also don't quite agree with, and he think Morgan harp anger may be "several months of JiFen rose up out".
http://www.cheapuggsaleuk.co.uk/
Posted by: Mbtmbtshoes | July 22, 2011 at 09:54 PM
Great insight on the growing influence of China in the affairs of the US. Thanks
acanthosis nigricans
Posted by: Bill Stein | August 11, 2011 at 10:00 PM
I think a model like Germany where the workers are on the board at companies steer a much different and better course of development than the top down American approach.The whole dialogue about education becomes much richer and diverse and skills focused. Much de industrialization happened in the 70's according to Bluestone and Harrison, 37million or so jobs were lost according to their study. Flippin' burgers may not be the worst thing in the world in a culture that rebels against education IF you have very affordable health care and housing ,I guess.
Posted by: Craig Williams | August 31, 2011 at 09:23 AM
Seems like an excellent offer additional Obama career assasination. Skin Ringworm
Posted by: Gwormd | September 05, 2011 at 11:23 AM
Thanks for such an informative article and the extensive explanation, it's been very useful. I try and learn something new everyday. I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here. russian women
Posted by: D | September 14, 2011 at 06:16 AM
Does it will likely be included with Nexus 1. Or I have to download it Natural Urticaria Relief
Posted by: Kidneyr | September 14, 2011 at 12:05 PM
But a repudiation is implicit in the arguments that they now make about the central role of governance failures in the current crisis in the U.S. oil screw press
Posted by: Vin Ke | October 19, 2011 at 10:03 PM
Home for no money was evidencing concern and commitment for old people.
screw press
Posted by: Vin Ke | October 27, 2011 at 01:13 AM
On Bluetooth paired to my car it works fine when moving under 30 MPH, but struggles on the highway at speeds over 50MPH. pellet press
Posted by: Vin Ke | November 15, 2011 at 01:29 AM
The term refers to the direct structural and functional connection between living bone and the surface of a load-bearing artificial implant. Moncler
Posted by: Aleclihong | November 19, 2011 at 03:20 AM
http://bit.ly/rzsThp
On May 9, 2011 Stump uploaded "Explode", a track from the upcoming record to YouTube. A song remix of a Soul Punk track titled "This City" featuring Lupe Fiasco was uploaded to YouTube and was later released to iTunes and other online outlets on July 26 as the album's first single. Its music video was premiered on Vevo on September 20.
Posted by: Lifenzhu | November 19, 2011 at 04:47 AM
I have been utilizing android for around three months now. I feel its the most beneficial os I have actually utilized. -- http://bit.ly/sowlZC
Posted by: RenesPaley | November 19, 2011 at 05:00 AM