My Photo

Search the blog

  • Google

    WWW
    rodrik.typepad.com

« Beating a not-so-dead horse on food prices | Main | On Larry Summers and being an anti-globalizer »

May 01, 2008

Comments

Great Zamfir

"The third pillar is requiring banks to pay an insurance premium to tax payers against the risk that the tax payer will be required to bail them out. If such a market could be created, it would not only incentivise good banking and push the focus of regulation away from process to outcomes, but it would provide an incentive for banks to be less systemic."

I loved this one, but it is a bit unclear to me how you could set up a market for this, or otherwise determine fair prices.
Any ideas?

claudio

How to (not) regulate the labor market (in Brazil): http://portalexame.abril.com.br/static/aberto/newsletter/news_30042008.html

Per Kurowski

To Great Zamfir. It is actually quite straithforward. Do not use the market bit size. Just follow the tradition of not putting all your eggs in the same basket and therefore create a progressive tax on the size of the banks. The larger the bank, the more it will hurt if it fails, so the more it should pay in insurance premiums.

Per Kurowski

Avinash Persaud also mentions that “the secondary objective, which is to avoid the discouragement of good banking” and in this he is getting much closer to what I have held for over a decade now, being what is the use of a bank regulatory system which only objective is to avoid a bank crisis since avoiding bank crisis per se cannot be the prime objective for our banks?

The following brief comment might better summarize what I mean.

Does prudence in banking really have to mean purposelessness?

What is more prudent for the bank regulators, to work exclusively at avoiding the default of banks and the occurrence of a bank crisis, or to ascertain that the banking system serves a purpose for the society?

These days when it has been demonstrated that the bank regulators are failing in their self imposed limited scope of functions; and indeed through the creation of the current structure of minimum capital requirements for the banks and the appointment of the credit rating agencies as risk commissars have themselves contributed to create new systemic risks, is it not time for us to take a big step back and, before digging us deeper in our regulatory hole, ask ourselves what is the purpose of our banks?

Aren’t you as fed up as me having a purposeless banking sector? If we absolutely have to live with risk avoidance based regulatory system, can’t we at least start measuring units of default risk in terms of decent jobs created, youngsters educated or environmental threats avoided?

Risk is the oxygen of development and so please let us not kill or even define risk taking!

Per Kurowski

But when Avinash Persaud says “there are few crises I have known from the inside that would not have happened if only there was more disclosure. People knew that sub-prime was a poor risk – it is called sub-prime, after all” there I do not agree.

First of all on a general point he seems to ignore that “to err is human” and on a more technical point he is factually wrong as you could indeed structure very prime securities around subprime mortgages but what happened in this case is that the official risk commissars the credit rating agencies, being human, erred, big, not noticing that the new batch of subprime mortgages being sent up had nothing to do with the older batches.

Per Kurowski

And when Avinash Persaud says “Almost every economic model will tell you that if all the players have the same tastes (reduce capital adequacy requirements) and have the same information (public ratings, approved risk-models using market prices) that the system will sooner or later send the herd off the cliff edge (Persaud 2000). And no degree of greater sophistication in the modelling of the price of risk will get around this fact”, the number one question that springs to ones mind is about “the inappropriateness of the financial regulators”. Who is going to tackle that one?

rolex watches


People usually say :"Seeing is believing." http://www.tt88times.com
Each attempt has a corresponding gain, in part or obvious, or vague. At least we have the kind of satisfaction After I bought this watch ,in a sense,it means a great deal to me. http://www.fashionhairfu.com

ghd straighteners

GHD straighteners was kmown as ghd flat iron, which was authorized online seller provides all kinds of hair straighteners,pink ghd,purple ghd,babyliss. By visiting ghd australia , you will find what you want and made yourself more beautiful.If you miss it ,you miss beauty.Buy a piece of ghd for yourself.Come and join us http://www.ghdoutlet-au.com/ to win the ghd iv styler.

birkenstock

Birkenstock was Made in Germany since 1774 . Check out our Birkenstock sandals and Birkenstock shoes including the Birkenstock gizeh,at the lowest regular outlet prices, free shipping and when you put on Birkenstocks. you will feel very comfortable.

lachou

I like these articles , democratic countries formulate policies are both team and the interests of the people of power, but the undemocratic countries rarely for the interests of the people, http://www.jerseysky.com it is the sorrow of many democracy, I like the western and northern state policy.
http://www.cheapsaleing.com

lv bags

I don’t think you can do that, yet.

jordan shoes

I’ve seen progression in every post. Your newer posts are simply wonderful compared to your posts in the past. Keep up the good work!

cheap and high quality handbags


Im not going to say what everyone else has already said, but I do want to comment on your knowledge of the topic. You're truly well-informed.

Account Deleted

raf

Thanks for sharing.

Ohioguide

columbus injury lawyer
I always enjoy reading your posts and I look forward to your next one.

Account Deleted

Raf
raf

Thanks to you ...

Account Deleted

Raf
raf

Good Job ...

Account Deleted

Many places and centers offer business and trade promotions to both buyers and supplier.What about the differences in skill intensities across industries? The job losses in the relatively unskilled-labor intensive battery industry should have little effect on the relatively skilled-labor intensive machinery
sexshop
sexyshop
sexshop online
alongador peniano

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)