You can read the four short essays on this question produced by Daron Acemoglu, Frank Fukuyama, Doug North, and myself here. There is much convergence of views in these essays, but also some disagreements. Daron and I disagree in particular on two issues: whether industrial policy makes sense or not (me: yes, Daron: no) and whether institutional reform should adopt a best-practice approach or not (me: no, Daron: yes). I take Doug North's views on the latter question to be much closer to mine than to Daron's--or at least they appeared to be so in the discussion following the presentations.
"The hallmark of an “advanced” developed society is a government
that exhibits the attributes of good governance—transparency,
effectiveness, rule of law, lack of corruption, voice and participation.
From Adam Smith on down, economists have recognized the importance of these attributes. But they have had much less to say about how to achieve them—and for good reason. These are at their core social, political, and legal arrangements which markets—and economic analysis—typically presuppose. They are deeply embedded in the history,traditions, and politics of a society...."--Dani Rodrik
Are economist being too presumptuous, since changes in economic policy can lead to changes in the political policy? Political policy when faced with economic change isn't just about the creation of institutions but the preservation of institutions.
If free trade with country B ends up weakening the power of unions and strengthening the power of corporations in country A, this can lead to changes in country A's political institutions for the better or worse. So how can the economics of free trade--the permanent removal of tariffs--be separated from the politics of institutions? And if it can't, wouldn't the best way of seeing that a economic gain doesn't end up a political loss be the establishment of international governments like the EU rather than economic organizations like the World Bank?
Harmonizing political rights--the right to vote, the right of labor to associate--before free trade is extended to another country, and seeing that the countries that you do extend free trade to are able to enforce the rules and regulations of the international government they are subject to, helps to insure that progress in the economic sphere isn't made at the expense of progress in the political sphere. It's not just a matter of finding what economic practices work best for country B but seeing that those practices don't end up undermining the political practices of country A.
When it comes to free trade, without international government the means and ends toward economic and political goals become unduly tangled.
Posted by: wjd123 | April 26, 2008 at 01:57 AM
You say: "Playing around with tariff and tax schedules and with the composition of public expenditure is worthwhile only to the extent that it achieves other objectives we really care about: increased growth, reduced poverty, improved equity. By contrast, it would be hard to take issue with the intrinsic importance of improved governance along its various dimensions: rule of law, transparency, voice, accountability, effective government." The problem here is illustrated by your use of the words "by contrast." Remember the old arguments about "no taxation without representation." As a fairly recent book (http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521888158) puts it: "Taxation is the new frontier for those concerned with state-building in developing countries. The political importance of taxation extends beyond the raising of revenue. We argue in this book that taxation may play the central role in building and sustaining the power of states, and shaping their ties to society. The state-building role of taxation can be seen in two principal areas: the rise of a social contract based on bargaining around tax, and the institution-building stimulus provided by the revenue imperative. Progress in the first area may foster representative democracy. Progress in the second area strengthens state capacity. Both have the potential to bolster the legitimacy of the state and enhance accountability between the state and its citizens." It's just that policy-makers, particularly those favourable to "Washington Consensus" arguments, tend to focus on the revenue (and "efficiency" sides as being the only aspects of tax worth discussing. You seem to be following their lead.
Posted by: Nicholas Shaxson | April 28, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Thanks for share this kind of interesting info on your site about the world bank's point of view. I've more interesting info... Tadalafil , it's a great pharmacy product and you can buy it online http://www.xlpharmacy.com
Posted by: Tadalafil | May 07, 2009 at 02:44 PM
The numbers are believable if the driver of population growth during the not-so-bad times is the return of emigrants who left during the bad times.
Posted by: timberland boots | June 13, 2009 at 10:10 PM
I worked for this company and left because they downsized all of Buisness Development, the president of the company suddenly quit, and contracts were not being won and big talk of downsizing was a common occurance.
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | June 13, 2009 at 10:12 PM
I would guess that the before-majority tends to reflect a consensus opinion, the arguments in favor of which are probably more commonly encountered in everyday life. Most of the arguments and ideas that are new to the audience would then be coming from the anti-consensus side, so more weakly-decided people would break for the side bringing previously unconsidered information to the table.
Posted by: nike sb | June 13, 2009 at 10:13 PM
The numbers are believable if the driver of population growth during the not-so-bad times is the return of emigrants who left during the bad times.
Posted by: aion kinah for sale | June 28, 2009 at 10:17 PM
nice information here, many comments.if you are interested to have generic drugs like Kamagra caverta. You can get their at http://www.netpharmaworld.com
Posted by: buy kamagra online | July 30, 2009 at 06:49 AM
Many insurance companies are considering these prescriptions as optional and are saying that you do not really need them.
Posted by: Viagra Online | September 01, 2009 at 05:40 AM
Hi buddies very interesting information about What should the World Bank know and think about governance
Posted by: Cosmetic Plastic Surgery Center | September 14, 2009 at 04:51 PM
who is Frank Fukuyama???
Posted by: breast augmentation surgery | September 14, 2009 at 06:19 PM
I always read your blogs and in this case I like your post about governance
Posted by: Canada Pharmacy | September 16, 2009 at 11:54 AM
this is just a power struggle? Is it better if you have the support each other?
Posted by: Teenagers Parents | September 21, 2009 at 10:17 AM
thanks for this interesting news
Posted by: Anxiety Depression Meds | September 22, 2009 at 04:56 PM
Hey Dani Rodrik's weblog rocks its the best blog in the web
Posted by: Buy Generic Sildenafil Citrate | September 23, 2009 at 06:14 PM
Hello this page have a lot of info
Posted by: Generic Propecia Online | September 23, 2009 at 06:16 PM
Hello
What a fantastic blog!!
cool this blog is great very good my friend keep it going
Posted by: Best Price Generic Viagra | September 24, 2009 at 12:43 PM
hi
I have enjoyed following your blog entries.
Great!!!
Posted by: Generic Viagra | September 24, 2009 at 05:12 PM
Hello
great post thanks for sharing a informative
thanks you for your information.
Posted by: Buy Generic Viagra | September 25, 2009 at 10:36 AM
Hello
wow nice post it gave excellent and useful info!!!!!
Posted by: Natural Cure for Impotence | September 25, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Hello
Great post thanks for sharing a informative article keep it up
Posted by: No Prescription Pharmacy | September 28, 2009 at 09:07 AM
Hello
cool this blog is great very good my friend keep it going
Have a nice day
Posted by: Without Prescriptions | September 28, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Hello thanks for sharing this blog!!
Posted by: Soft Cialis | October 09, 2009 at 03:04 PM
Could I access to the industrial reform online? I would be interested to read it carefully.
Posted by: Generic Cialis Online | October 14, 2009 at 03:48 PM
The world bank is only a great scam,theres no way for deal with them.
Posted by: Dental Care | October 14, 2009 at 05:32 PM