My Photo

What I do

Search the blog

  • Google

    WWW
    rodrik.typepad.com

International economic news

« How Ireland does it | Main | Davos thoughts »

January 20, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c891753ef00e54fe89a848833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mr. Lin goes to Washington:

Comments

I found his swimming from Taiwan to China hard to believe until i checked in Wikipedia that he actually swam from Taiwan-administered Kinmen which is just off the mainland. Amazing feat nonetheless.

Dani -

This is great news - finally a Chinese to advise the IBRD!

Dani - are you too optimistic? Consider for instance of his explanation of 'the China miracle' (2003):

“The adoption of the leap-forward strategy before the reform caused China's industrial structure to deviate from the optimum pattern determined by the country's comparative advantage ... This distorted industrial structure ran contrary to the general laws of economic development, and has led to negative economic growth on several occasions. Since the 1978 reform, however, the bias against labour-intensive industries has been gradually alleviated and the distortion in industrial structure has been gradually corrected”

Or take the quote from The Economist's profile.

Is his view not quite different from yours?

To respond to Adrian's concerns from The China Miracle, I think the Economist said it best in the review: "So his intellectual portfolio is perfectly hedged." Given the rest of his background, he seems like a natural consensus builder?

I though honest and trust are those very essential, and necessary elements for any economist. Unfortunately Mr. Lin appointment to World Bank is a clear and very obvious exception.
Can’t be please, can we?

Adrian - I don't think it is. Subsidising industries that run totally against a country's static CA only works with the best of governments and situations.

But his view that "as an economy develops, the state should coax firms into more sophisticated industries. This prodding may be needed for several reasons. To cite one: firms may not know which industries are viable, and which are not. So the government should subsidise pioneers who break a path for others" lies very close to Dani's thinking as far as I can see.

Justin Lin, as a former officer in the same army that lost the Chinese Civil War, was following an illustrious tradition.

Indeed, the Communists would have had a much harder time winning the war if they hadn't been able to persuade so many Nationalist generals to switch over to the winning side.

Blogs are so interactive where we get lots o informative on any topics nice job keep it up !!

http://www.usatermpapers.com

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment