My Photo

What I do

Search the blog

  • Google

    WWW
    rodrik.typepad.com

International economic news

« It's front page news in the WSJ, so it must be a big deal | Main | I don't get Paul Krugman »

May 25, 2007

Majority of Americans favor a guest worker program

This according to a new poll reported in today's NYT.  Sixty-six percent of respondents are in favor of a guest worker program, and only 30 percent are against. (Check question 69 here.)  Frankly, I am surprised this is so popular, given how unpopular many other aspects of globalization are. For example, the Pew Research Center reports that only a minority of Americans (44%) believe free trader agreements are good for the U.S., and the balance is sharply in favor of those who believe such agreements destroy jobs.

Maybe most people instinctively understand the point made here...   

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c891753ef00d8357da12d69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Majority of Americans favor a guest worker program:

Comments

My ignorant take is this is not identified as a free trade issue for most people. My ignorant take, informed only by being a Californian living in Arizona, is that people appreciate the work and efforts of immigrants or would be immigrants, but truly dislike the "illegal" aspects of illegal immigration.

I often hear people of all political stripes railing about the illegals. You can't miss it. The conversation occurs everywhere out here. But I have actually never heard any of those people make any kind of racial or disparaging comments about the people themselves or their origins.

Perhaps that is actually a really good thing to say about America.

It may be that most people really don't understand what the guest worker program is all about (I certainly don't) and are just going off the difference between guest work, and illegal aliens working.

(But I really have no clue.)

Dani Rodrik: "Maybe most people instinctively understand the point made here..."

It's certainly a powerful argument, but it's being very selectively applied to immigration and guest worker programs. Why not apply it to all manner of economic policy analysis. Do you do so in your work, or encourage others to do so in their's?

The question was:

“Would you favor or oppose a program allowing people from other countries to be guest workers in the U.S. ?”

Now, guests go home. Experience has shown that “there is nothing more permanent than a temporary worker”. Borjas has blogged on this very subject. See borjas.typepad.com/the_borjas_blog/2007/05/on_guest_worker.html for his comments.

Imagine the poll response if the question was written:

“Would you favor or oppose a program allowing people from other countries to be guest workers in the U.S. even though the program would have no way of forcing the guest workers to return home and experience shows, they won’t?”

To get an honest answer, you need to ask an honest question.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment